Aerial toy
Godbout March 9, 1
U.S. patent number D263,322 [Application Number 05/884,050] was granted by the patent office on 1982-03-09 for aerial toy. Invention is credited to Normand A. Godbout.
| United States Patent | D263,322 |
| Godbout | March 9, 1982 |
Aerial toy
Claims
The ornamental design for an aerial toy, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Godbout; Normand A. (Laval, Quebec, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/884,050 |
| Filed: | March 6, 1978 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/449 |
| Current International Class: | D2101 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/87,88,89,91 ;46/74A,76R,77,78,79,80,81 ;D12/71 ;244/153R,154,155R |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 3194520 | July 1965 | Kurkjian |
| 3920201 | November 1975 | Battles |
Other References
|
Western Aerospace, 8-1962, p. 12, paraglider at top of page.. |
Primary Examiner: Rademaker; Charles A.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of an aerial toy showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view of the design thereof; and
FIG. 5 is a right side elevational view of the design thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 