Dental air motor
Meller January 19, 1
U.S. patent number D262,737 [Application Number 06/117,077] was granted by the patent office on 1982-01-19 for dental air motor. This patent grant is currently assigned to Adimec, Advanced Mechanical Ltd.. Invention is credited to Moshe Meller.
| United States Patent | D262,737 |
| Meller | January 19, 1982 |
Dental air motor
Claims
The ornamental design for the dental air motor, shown and described.
| Inventors: | Meller; Moshe (Nahariya, IL) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Adimec, Advanced Mechanical
Ltd. (Nahariya, IL) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/117,077 |
| Filed: | January 31, 1980 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/146 |
| Current International Class: | D2402 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/5,4,7,12 ;433/84,103,104,114 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D241550 | September 1976 | Morin |
| 2876015 | March 1959 | Steuer et al. |
| 3842504 | October 1974 | Ricks |
| 4007529 | February 1977 | Fleer |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Schwartz, Jeffery, Schwaab, Mack, Blumenthal & Koch
Description
FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of the dental air motor, and
FIG. 2 is a bottom perspective view of the dental air motor
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 