Chair
Wilson January 5, 1
U.S. patent number D262,502 [Application Number 06/114,806] was granted by the patent office on 1982-01-05 for chair. This patent grant is currently assigned to Chromcraft Corporation. Invention is credited to Robert L. Wilson.
| United States Patent | D262,502 |
| Wilson | January 5, 1982 |
Chair
Claims
The ornamental design for a chair, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Wilson; Robert L. (Memphis, TN) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Chromcraft Corporation
(Amsterdam, NY) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/114,806 |
| Filed: | January 24, 1980 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/372 |
| Current International Class: | D0601 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/26,30,31,47-78 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D234478 | March 1975 | Koepke |
| D239992 | May 1976 | Gabourie |
| D240484 | July 1976 | Sklaroff |
| D253678 | December 1979 | Gibilterra |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Flanagan; Joseph P.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a chair showing my design.
FIG. 2 is a side view of the design of the instant invention.
FIG. 3 is a rear view of the design of the instant invention.
FIG. 4 is a top view of the design of the instant invention.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 