Crack sealer
Bopst, III December 15, 1
U.S. patent number D262,291 [Application Number 06/049,200] was granted by the patent office on 1981-12-15 for crack sealer. Invention is credited to John H. Bopst, III.
| United States Patent | D262,291 |
| Bopst, III | December 15, 1981 |
Crack sealer
Claims
The ornamental design for a crack sealer, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Bopst, III; John H. (Baltimore, MD) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/049,200 |
| Filed: | June 18, 1979 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D15/144; 156/577; D8/14; D8/30 |
| Current International Class: | D1599 |
| Field of Search: | ;D15/144 ;D8/30,14 ;156/233,523,527,577,579,583 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D253512 | November 1979 | Davenport |
| 4248659 | February 1981 | Bopst |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: McClellan, Sr.; John F.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view showing my new design for a crack sealer;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof, and
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view.
The electric cords are fragmentarily shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 to illustrate their indeterminate _length. The roller in FIGS. 1 and 2 is shown for illustrative purposes only.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 