Nutcracker
Murawski December 15, 1
U.S. patent number D262,255 [Application Number 06/087,875] was granted by the patent office on 1981-12-15 for nutcracker. Invention is credited to Eugene R. Murawski.
| United States Patent | D262,255 |
| Murawski | December 15, 1981 |
Nutcracker
Claims
The ornamental design for a nutcracker, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Murawski; Eugene R. (Mexico, MO) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/087,875 |
| Filed: | October 24, 1979 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/680; D14/149 |
| Current International Class: | D0706 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/98 ;D14/53,63,64 ;30/120.1,120.2,120.3,120.4,120.5 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D27093 | May 1897 | Collins |
| D189877 | March 1961 | Mosing |
| D211738 | July 1968 | Dreyfuss |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Gravely, Lieder & Woodruff
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a nutcracker showing my new design in a closed position;
FIG. 2 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof, with the spiral simulated cord being broken away; and
FIG. 5 is a front perspective view thereof in an opened position.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 