Headlight
Catte June 9, 1
U.S. patent number D259,516 [Application Number 06/046,729] was granted by the patent office on 1981-06-09 for headlight. This patent grant is currently assigned to Cibie Projecteurs. Invention is credited to Pierre Catte.
| United States Patent | D259,516 |
| Catte | June 9, 1981 |
Headlight
Claims
The ornamental design for a headlight, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Catte; Pierre (Sevres, FR) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Cibie Projecteurs (Bobigny,
FR) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/046,729 |
| Filed: | June 8, 1979 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D26/28 |
| Current International Class: | D2606 |
| Field of Search: | ;D26/28,29,35,36,120,122,123,124 ;362/61,307,310,311,362,367,375,235,240,241,242,244,245,246,427,326,329,335-340 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D217386 | April 1970 | Muneoka |
| D229774 | January 1974 | Cibie |
| D237648 | November 1975 | Cibie |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Levine; Alan H.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a headlight showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top view thereof; and
FIG. 5 is a bottom view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 