Kitchen blender base
Levin June 2, 1
U.S. patent number D259,387 [Application Number 06/050,765] was granted by the patent office on 1981-06-02 for kitchen blender base. This patent grant is currently assigned to Scovill Inc.. Invention is credited to Monte L. Levin.
| United States Patent | D259,387 |
| Levin | June 2, 1981 |
Kitchen blender base
Claims
The ornamental design for a kitchen blender base, as shown.
| Inventors: | Levin; Monte L. (New York, NY) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Scovill Inc. (Waterbury,
CT) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/050,765 |
| Filed: | June 21, 1979 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/386 |
| Current International Class: | D0704 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/153,154,155,160,158 ;D15/92,95,98,99 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D206780 | January 1967 | Dewenter |
| D216237 | December 1969 | Levin |
| D218583 | September 1970 | Gilson |
| D246564 | December 1977 | Haufe |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Hoopes; Dallett
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a kitchen blender base showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view;
FIG. 3 is a side elevational view;
FIG. 4 is a front elevational view;
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view; and
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 