Article carrier blank
Calvert May 5, 1
U.S. patent number D259,104 [Application Number 06/025,370] was granted by the patent office on 1981-05-05 for article carrier blank. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Mead Corporation. Invention is credited to Rodney K. Calvert.
| United States Patent | D259,104 |
| Calvert | May 5, 1981 |
Article carrier blank
Claims
The ornamental design for an article carrier blank, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Calvert; Rodney K. (Dunwoody, GA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | The Mead Corporation (Dayton,
OH) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/025,370 |
| Filed: | March 30, 1979 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/433 |
| Current International Class: | D0903 |
| Field of Search: | ;206/147,175-179 ;229/28BC ;D9/245 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| Re29063 | December 1976 | Graser |
| 3356258 | December 1967 | Vesak |
| 4202446 | May 1980 | Sutherland |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Rodgers & Rodgers
Description
The single FIGURE is a plan view of an article _carrier blank showing my new design with the thickness thereof being that of standard paperboard material. The side not shown is a mirror image of the side shown and the dash lines represent fold lines.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 