Key-ring
Brentini April 21, 1
U.S. patent number D258,921 [Application Number 05/809,476] was granted by the patent office on 1981-04-21 for key-ring. Invention is credited to Attilo Brentini.
| United States Patent | D258,921 |
| Brentini | April 21, 1981 |
Key-ring
Claims
The ornamental design for a key-ring, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Brentini; Attilo (Crissier, Vaud, CH) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/809,476 |
| Filed: | June 23, 1977 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| May 18, 1977 [CH] | 65 068 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D3/207 |
| Current International Class: | D0301 |
| Field of Search: | ;D87/8-8.4 ;D8/333,334 ;70/456R,457-459,20 ;24/3K,235 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D23686 | October 1894 | Mix |
| 3635058 | January 1972 | Polk |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Groff, Jr.; Emory L.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a key ring showing any new design with the rotatable ring in an open position; and
FIG. 2 is a modified form of the key ring with the rotatable ring in a closed position.
The sides of the key ring opposite those shown are identical to the sides shown in the drawing.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 