Window component extrusion
Dallaire March 17, 1
U.S. patent number D258,619 [Application Number 05/942,755] was granted by the patent office on 1981-03-17 for window component extrusion. Invention is credited to Raymond Dallaire.
| United States Patent | D258,619 |
| Dallaire | March 17, 1981 |
Window component extrusion
Claims
The ornamental design for a window component extrusion, as shown.
| Inventors: | Dallaire; Raymond (Levis, Quebec, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/942,755 |
| Filed: | September 14, 1978 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Mar 17, 1978 [CA] | 17037810 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D25/119 |
| Current International Class: | D2501 |
| Field of Search: | ;D25/47,48,52,60,61,73,74,75,76 ;49/413,504 ;52/716,720-739 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D162843 | April 1951 | Klein |
| D251134 | February 1979 | Bancroft et al. |
| D251447 | March 1979 | Bancroft et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Malley; John W.
Description
FIG. 1 is a broken perspective of one side of the extrusion, and
FIG. 2 is a corresponding broken perspective from the opposite side of the extrusion compared to FIG. 1.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 