Chiropractic mattress, or similar article
Kroll March 10, 1
U.S. patent number D258,481 [Application Number 06/006,299] was granted by the patent office on 1981-03-10 for chiropractic mattress, or similar article. Invention is credited to Frederick H. Kroll.
| United States Patent | D258,481 |
| Kroll | March 10, 1981 |
Chiropractic mattress, or similar article
Claims
The ornamental design for a chiropractic mattress, or similar article, as shown.
| Inventors: | Kroll; Frederick H. (New Rochelle, NY) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/006,299 |
| Filed: | January 25, 1979 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/604 |
| Current International Class: | D0609 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/201,204,200,209 ;5/420,449,448,455,456,434,432,431 ;128/70,68,33 ;4/185B,185HB |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D167871 | September 1952 | Vega |
| 2541029 | February 1951 | Burton |
| 1141744 | Sep 1957 | FR | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: McAulay, Fields, Fisher & Goldstein
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a chiropractic mattress, or similar article, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view; and
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 