Simulative aerial toy
Schoch February 3, 1
U.S. patent number D258,157 [Application Number 05/919,368] was granted by the patent office on 1981-02-03 for simulative aerial toy. Invention is credited to Robert R. Schoch.
| United States Patent | D258,157 |
| Schoch | February 3, 1981 |
Simulative aerial toy
Claims
The ornamental design for a simulative aerial toy, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Schoch; Robert R. (High Point, NC) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/919,368 |
| Filed: | June 26, 1978 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/450 |
| Current International Class: | D2101 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/87,88,89,90,91,82,83,114,115 ;D30/11 ;46/74,76R,77,78,79,80,81 ;D12/71 ;244/153R,154 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D105111 | June 1937 | Kalep |
| D235671 | July 1975 | Spiegel |
| D244172 | May 1977 | Lee |
| D248054 | May 1978 | Harrod |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Rabin; David
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a simulative aerial toy showing my design;
FIG. 2 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof; and
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 