Dining table
Berlic December 23, 1
U.S. patent number D257,653 [Application Number 05/915,207] was granted by the patent office on 1980-12-23 for dining table. Invention is credited to France Berlic.
| United States Patent | D257,653 |
| Berlic | December 23, 1980 |
Dining table
Claims
The ornamental design for a dining table, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Berlic; France (Jackson Heights, NY) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/915,207 |
| Filed: | June 13, 1978 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/691.5 |
| Current International Class: | D0603 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/27,146-149,156,157,170-175,177,178,179,190,191 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D235292 | June 1975 | Podell |
| D236058 | July 1975 | Kramer |
| D239801 | May 1976 | Szvcs |
| D250312 | November 1978 | Duke et al. |
Other References
|
Design Catalog, 2-1964, p. 28, Table Top left.. |
Primary Examiner: Dunkins; Bruce W.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Ross; Karl F.
Description
FIG. 1 is a side view of a dining table showing my design;
FIG. 2 is an end-elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof; and
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof.
The side and end not shown are like the side and end shown.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 