50 Star flag
Carr September 30, 1
U.S. patent number D257,136 [Application Number 05/951,663] was granted by the patent office on 1980-09-30 for 50 star flag. Invention is credited to Charles P. Carr.
| United States Patent | D257,136 |
| Carr | September 30, 1980 |
50 Star flag
Claims
The ornamental design for a 50 star flag, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Carr; Charles P. (Flushing, NY) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/951,663 |
| Filed: | October 16, 1978 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D11/179 |
| Current International Class: | D1105 |
| Field of Search: | ;D11/165-167,172,178-180 ;116/173-175 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 102267 | April 1870 | Holt |
Other References
|
New York Sunday News, 7/4/1954, p. 8-U.S. Jack at bottom left. . The Washington Star Pictorial Magazine, 4/19/1953, pp. 8-9, Article on Proposed New Flag Designs.. |
Primary Examiner: Zarfas; Louis S.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Miller; Richard L.
Description
FIG. 1 is a plan view of a 50 star flag, showing my new design, the opposite side being a mirror image of the side shown herein;
FIG. 2 is a side edge view thereof; and
FIG. 3 is a top edge view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 