Jug
Burrington , et al. September 2, 1
U.S. patent number D256,664 [Application Number 05/954,439] was granted by the patent office on 1980-09-02 for jug. This patent grant is currently assigned to Hoover Universal, Inc.. Invention is credited to Robert P. Burrington, Richard L. Platte.
| United States Patent | D256,664 |
| Burrington , et al. | September 2, 1980 |
Jug
Claims
The ornamental design for a jug, as shown.
| Inventors: | Burrington; Robert P. (Saline, MI), Platte; Richard L. (Ann Arbor, MI) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Hoover Universal, Inc. (Saline,
MI) |
| Appl. No.: | 05/954,439 |
| Filed: | October 25, 1978 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/520; D9/531 |
| Current International Class: | D0901 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/40-43 ;215/1R,1C |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D213821 | April 1969 | Platte |
| D221516 | August 1971 | Crisci |
| D229670 | December 1973 | Platte |
| D238654 | February 1976 | Platte |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Olsen; Finn G.
Description
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of a jug showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear elevational view;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view; and
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 