Sterilizer unit
Thomas July 22, 1
U.S. patent number D256,049 [Application Number 05/883,344] was granted by the patent office on 1980-07-22 for sterilizer unit. This patent grant is currently assigned to Ryder International Corporation. Invention is credited to Michael D. Thomas.
| United States Patent | D256,049 |
| Thomas | July 22, 1980 |
Sterilizer unit
Claims
The ornamental design for a sterilizer unit, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Thomas; Michael D. (Arab, AL) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Ryder International Corporation
(Hanover Park, IL) |
| Appl. No.: | 05/883,344 |
| Filed: | March 3, 1978 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/218; 422/243 |
| Current International Class: | D2401 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/9 ;422/243,297,300,302 ;D16/48,82,83 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D243556 | March 1977 | Thomas et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Trexler; Richard R.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of my new sterilizer unit with the cover for the heating well in the closed condition;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 