Armchair
Lubke July 1, 1
U.S. patent number D255,625 [Application Number 05/831,794] was granted by the patent office on 1980-07-01 for armchair. This patent grant is currently assigned to Lubke KG. Invention is credited to Karl Lubke.
| United States Patent | D255,625 |
| Lubke | July 1, 1980 |
Armchair
Claims
The ornamental design for an armchair, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Lubke; Karl (Rheda, DE) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Lubke KG (Rheda,
DE) |
| Appl. No.: | 05/831,794 |
| Filed: | September 9, 1977 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/379 |
| Current International Class: | D0601 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/67-78,37-39 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D189293 | November 1960 | Petitt |
Other References
|
Harter Corp. Cat., May 14, 1973, sec. 2, Armchair Nos. 610, 533/14. |
Primary Examiner: Dunkins; Bruce W.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Kane; David S.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective front elevational view of an armchair showing the new design;
FIG. 2 is a perspective side elevational view of the armchair as seen from the right-hand side of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a perspective plan view of the armchair; and
FIG. 4 is a perspective rear elevational view of the armchair.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 