Double ring
Abelson March 25, 1
U.S. patent number D254,537 [Application Number 05/924,899] was granted by the patent office on 1980-03-25 for double ring. Invention is credited to Mildred Abelson.
| United States Patent | D254,537 |
| Abelson | March 25, 1980 |
Double ring
Claims
The ornamental design for a double ring, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Abelson; Mildred (Roslyn Heights, NY) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/924,899 |
| Filed: | July 14, 1978 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D11/34; 63/15.1; D11/27; D11/28; D11/35 |
| Current International Class: | D1101 |
| Field of Search: | ;D11/2,3,26-29,34-36 ;63/1R,1A,2,15-15.8 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D104924 | June 1937 | Heyman |
| 424211 | March 1890 | Kaas et al. |
| 1849388 | March 1932 | Tashoff |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Posnack, Roberts, Cohen & Spiecens
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a double ring showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof, both sides being the same;
FIG. 3 is an edge elevational view thereof, both edges being the same;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof; and
FIG. 5 is an exploded perspective view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 