Moped
Hahn October 9, 1
U.S. patent number D253,102 [Application Number 05/935,211] was granted by the patent office on 1979-10-09 for moped. This patent grant is currently assigned to AMF Incorporated. Invention is credited to Daniel G. Hahn.
| United States Patent | D253,102 |
| Hahn | October 9, 1979 |
Moped
Claims
The ornamental design for a moped, as shown.
| Inventors: | Hahn; Daniel G. (Olney, IL) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | AMF Incorporated (White Plains,
NY) |
| Appl. No.: | 05/935,211 |
| Filed: | August 21, 1978 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/110; D12/111 |
| Current International Class: | D1211 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/110,111 ;180/31,32,33R,33A,33C,33D,34 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D240910 | August 1976 | Davidson |
| 664585 | Nov 1949 | GB | |||
| 689733 | Nov 1949 | GB | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Price; George W.
Description
FIG. 1 is a right side elevational view of a moped showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 