Chair or the like
Scholten September 11, 1
U.S. patent number D252,840 [Application Number 05/781,727] was granted by the patent office on 1979-09-11 for chair or the like. Invention is credited to Menno Scholten.
| United States Patent | D252,840 |
| Scholten | September 11, 1979 |
Chair or the like
Claims
The ornamental design for a chair or the like, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Scholten; Menno (Chicago, IL) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/781,727 |
| Filed: | March 28, 1977 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/375 |
| Current International Class: | D0601 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/47-78 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D106898 | November 1937 | Moody |
| D167940 | October 1952 | Hofgesang |
| 2439690 | April 1948 | Lippenberger |
Other References
|
Industrial Design, 12-1969, p. 58, chair lower right.. |
Primary Examiner: Dunkins; Bruce W.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a chair or the like of my invention;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view of a chair or the like of my invention;
FIG. 3 is a side elevational view of a chair or the like of my invention; and
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view of a chair or the like of my invention.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 