Bike shoe
Edmonds February 27, 1
U.S. patent number D251,158 [Application Number 05/755,045] was granted by the patent office on 1979-02-27 for bike shoe. This patent grant is currently assigned to Bata Shoe Company, Inc.. Invention is credited to Thomas A. Edmonds.
| United States Patent | D251,158 |
| Edmonds | February 27, 1979 |
Bike shoe
Claims
The ornamental design for a bike shoe, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Edmonds; Thomas A. (Abingdon, MD) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Bata Shoe Company, Inc.
(Belcamp, MD) |
| Appl. No.: | 05/755,045 |
| Filed: | December 28, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/907 |
| Current International Class: | D0204 |
| Field of Search: | ;D10/309,310,311,313,319 ;36/32R,131,114,115 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D247136 | February 1978 | Mizoguchi |
| 343777 | June 1886 | Strickland |
| 3952428 | April 1976 | Polsky |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Holman; John Clarke
Description
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of a bike shoe showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a front elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 