Sandal
Young February 20, 1
U.S. patent number D251,096 [Application Number 05/815,903] was granted by the patent office on 1979-02-20 for sandal. Invention is credited to Michele S. Young.
| United States Patent | D251,096 |
| Young | February 20, 1979 |
Sandal
Claims
The ornamental design for a sandal, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Young; Michele S. (Coconut Grove, FL) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/815,903 |
| Filed: | July 15, 1977 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/917 |
| Current International Class: | D0204 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/270,291,292,293,289 ;36/8.1,7.7,11.5,7.5,34A,32R,3R |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D167624 | September 1952 | Feeks |
| D189839 | March 1961 | Nakashima |
| D207163 | March 1967 | Fukuoka |
| 2759284 | August 1956 | Santisi |
| 2947095 | August 1960 | Miyachi |
| 1225792 | Jul 1960 | FR | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Haley; Barry L.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a sandal showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a right side elevational view thereof, the left side being substantially a mirror image thereto;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 