Dual eye wash fountain
Gardner December 19, 1
U.S. patent number D250,594 [Application Number 05/750,081] was granted by the patent office on 1978-12-19 for dual eye wash fountain. Invention is credited to David Gardner.
| United States Patent | D250,594 |
| Gardner | December 19, 1978 |
Dual eye wash fountain
Claims
The ornamental design for a dual eye wash fountain, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Gardner; David (San Juan Capistrano, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/750,081 |
| Filed: | December 13, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D23/213; 239/25 |
| Current International Class: | D2301 |
| Field of Search: | ;D23/34,35 ;239/25,446,448,449,543 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2994481 | August 1961 | Blumberg |
| 3062452 | November 1962 | Knight |
| 3325101 | June 1967 | Cuschera |
| 3335957 | August 1967 | Jacobson |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Averill; Edgar W.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view taken from the top, front and right side of a dual eye wash fountain showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 