Scissors
Spigelman November 14, 1
U.S. patent number D250,246 [Application Number 05/781,284] was granted by the patent office on 1978-11-14 for scissors. Invention is credited to Alan Spigelman.
| United States Patent | D250,246 |
| Spigelman | November 14, 1978 |
Scissors
Claims
The ornamental design for scissors, as shown.
| Inventors: | Spigelman; Alan (New York, NY) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/781,284 |
| Filed: | March 25, 1977 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D8/57 |
| Current International Class: | D0803 |
| Field of Search: | ;D8/57,5,3,4,52,53,55,56,58 ;30/253,254,255,256,257,259,260,341 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D53607 | July 1919 | Rauh |
| D237038 | October 1975 | Laurenti |
| 606472 | June 1898 | Ogden |
| 2728140 | December 1955 | Krusius |
| 3979826 | September 1976 | Koch |
| 30,880 OF | 1897 | GB | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Le Fever; K. M.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of scissors, showing my new design.
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view.
FIG. 3 is a left end view of the elevation of FIG. 2.
FIG. 4 is a right end view of the elevation of FIG. 2.
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view.
FIG. 6 is a rear elevational view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 