Compressor
Nobata October 31, 1
U.S. patent number D250,113 [Application Number 05/743,355] was granted by the patent office on 1978-10-31 for compressor. Invention is credited to Tetsuo Nobata.
| United States Patent | D250,113 |
| Nobata | October 31, 1978 |
Compressor
Claims
The ornamental design for a compressor, as shown.
| Inventors: | Nobata; Tetsuo (Mizuho-ku, Nagoya City, Aichi Prefecture, JP) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/743,355 |
| Filed: | November 19, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D15/9 |
| Current International Class: | D1502 |
| Field of Search: | ;D23/127-167 ;D15/9 ;62/323 ;417/231,533,539,529 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D116241 | August 1939 | Radtke |
| D245779 | September 1977 | Nobata |
| 3160229 | December 1964 | Terasawa |
| 3666382 | May 1972 | Rasmussen |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Waters; Eric H.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front view of a compressor showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a left side view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a right side view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a rear view thereof; and
FIG. 7 is a perspective view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 