Table
Ungaro October 10, 1
U.S. patent number D249,860 [Application Number 05/740,578] was granted by the patent office on 1978-10-10 for table. This patent grant is currently assigned to Peters-Revington Corporation. Invention is credited to Nicholas Ungaro.
| United States Patent | D249,860 |
| Ungaro | October 10, 1978 |
Table
Claims
The ornamental design for a table, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Ungaro; Nicholas (Louisville, KY) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Peters-Revington Corporation
(Delphi, IN) |
| Appl. No.: | 05/740,578 |
| Filed: | November 10, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/657 |
| Current International Class: | D0603 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/161,164,181,186,177,178,179 |
Other References
|
house Beautiful, Oct. 1974, credenza top center, credenza on p. 120. . "Brandywine" by Thomasville, table No. 6405-1. . "Sprague & Carleton" by Patriot Pine, 1973 edition, p. 3, table No. 21-D210.. |
Primary Examiner: Dunkins; Bruce W.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Flanagan; Joseph P.
Description
The FIGURE is a perspective view of a table illustrating my new design.
The end of the table not shown is a mirror image of the end shown while the back thereof may be conventional in appearance.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 