Table
Levell October 10, 1
U.S. patent number D249,855 [Application Number 05/706,682] was granted by the patent office on 1978-10-10 for table. Invention is credited to Kevin Charles Levell.
| United States Patent | D249,855 |
| Levell | October 10, 1978 |
Table
Claims
The ornamental design for a table, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Levell; Kevin Charles (Los Angeles, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/706,682 |
| Filed: | July 19, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/692 |
| Current International Class: | D0603 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/146,147,148,149,175,176,177,178,179 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D237567 | November 1975 | Korn |
| D238028 | December 1975 | Gold |
Other References
|
Interiors, 10-1967, p. 161, table upper left. . "Berkline," section 6, p. 6-47-3, coffee table upper left.. |
Primary Examiner: Dunkins; Bruce W.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Silber; Howard A.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a table incorporating my new design, and wherein the appearance of the leg surfaces not shown is similar to the surfaces shown.
FIG. 2 is a bottom plan view of the table of FIG. 1.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 