Faucet handle
Doman August 29, 1
U.S. patent number D249,155 [Application Number 05/779,923] was granted by the patent office on 1978-08-29 for faucet handle. This patent grant is currently assigned to Kohler Co.. Invention is credited to Donald W. Doman.
| United States Patent | D249,155 |
| Doman | August 29, 1978 |
Faucet handle
Claims
The ornamental design for a faucet handle, as shown.
| Inventors: | Doman; Donald W. (Janesville, WI) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Kohler Co. (N/A) |
| Appl. No.: | 05/779,923 |
| Filed: | March 21, 1977 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D23/250; D8/312 |
| Current International Class: | D2301; D0806 |
| Field of Search: | ;D23/19-39 ;D8/300-312 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D111881 | October 1938 | Hoover |
| D201122 | May 1965 | Escalette |
| D205543 | August 1966 | Russell |
| D227251 | June 1973 | Botefur et al. |
| D231317 | April 1974 | Ludwiek |
| D236894 | September 1975 | Rice |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Seidel; Arthur H.
Description
FIG. 1 is a view in perspective of a faucet handle showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side view of my design; and
FIG. 3 is a top view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 