Tibial prosthesis
Groth, Jr. , et al. August 1, 1
U.S. patent number D248,771 [Application Number 05/719,229] was granted by the patent office on 1978-08-01 for tibial prosthesis. Invention is credited to Philip J. Fagan, Harry E. Groth, Jr..
| United States Patent | D248,771 |
| Groth, Jr. , et al. | August 1, 1978 |
Tibial prosthesis
Claims
The ornamental design for a tibial prosthesis, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Groth, Jr.; Harry E. (Portland, OR), Fagan; Philip J. (Beaverton, OR) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/719,229 |
| Filed: | August 31, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/155; 623/20.32 |
| Current International Class: | D2403 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/33 ;128/92C ;3/1.91,1.911 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D245259 | August 1977 | Shen |
| 3816855 | June 1974 | Saleh |
| 3924277 | September 1975 | Freeman et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Mugford; David J.
Description
FIG. 1 is a bottom plan view of a tibial prosthesis;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a rear plan view thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a perspective view thereof as viewed from the rear.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 