Cross
Newman July 11, 1
U.S. patent number D248,459 [Application Number 05/690,680] was granted by the patent office on 1978-07-11 for cross. Invention is credited to Lawrence D. Newman.
| United States Patent | D248,459 |
| Newman | July 11, 1978 |
Cross
Claims
The ornamental design for cross, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Newman; Lawrence D. (La Plume, PA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/690,680 |
| Filed: | May 27, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D11/96; D99/27 |
| Current International Class: | D3100 |
| Field of Search: | ;D11/1,14,44,7,48,53,81,83,96,99,101,105,142 ;D31/21.1-21.3 ;428/3,16 ;63/1 R-2/ ;63/23,18-21 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D213785 | April 1969 | Mock |
| D237723 | November 1975 | Sweet et al. |
| 3115434 | December 1963 | Hahn |
Other References
|
Evan's Christmas Supplementary Catalog, No. 7411, p. 10, Cross (Y) at bottom right.. |
Primary Examiner: Stearman; Joel
Assistant Examiner: Zarfas; Louis S.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of cross showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 