Shoe
Stevenson June 20, 1
U.S. patent number D248,192 [Application Number 05/712,273] was granted by the patent office on 1978-06-20 for shoe. Invention is credited to Richard L. Stevenson.
| United States Patent | D248,192 |
| Stevenson | June 20, 1978 |
Shoe
Claims
The ornamental design for a shoe, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Stevenson; Richard L. (Los Angeles, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/712,273 |
| Filed: | August 6, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/908 |
| Current International Class: | D0204 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/309-313,320 ;36/32R,59C,114,126-129 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D223329 | April 1972 | Oshima |
| D238832 | February 1976 | Famolare |
| D240371 | July 1976 | Shelly |
| D241988 | October 1976 | Famolare |
| 1313118 | August 1919 | Santacroce |
| 1494946 | May 1924 | Bernstein |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Beecher; Keith D.
Description
FIG. 1 is a bottom plan view of a shoe showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a left side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a front elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 