Cordless telephone
Greene March 21, 1
U.S. patent number D247,564 [Application Number 05/774,246] was granted by the patent office on 1978-03-21 for cordless telephone. Invention is credited to Robert L. Greene.
| United States Patent | D247,564 |
| Greene | March 21, 1978 |
Cordless telephone
Claims
The ornamental design for a cordless telephone, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Greene; Robert L. (Placentia, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/774,246 |
| Filed: | March 4, 1977 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D14/147 |
| Current International Class: | D1403 |
| Field of Search: | ;D14/53,63,64 ;325/16,15,118,492 ;179/1R,1D,178,179 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D231363 | April 1974 | Schmidt |
| D234605 | March 1975 | Larson |
| D234702 | April 1975 | Kuribayashi et al. |
| D244472 | May 1977 | Hiller |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Nienow; Harvey C.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a cordless telephone, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 