Smoking pipe
Frost December 6, 1
U.S. patent number D246,603 [Application Number 05/637,045] was granted by the patent office on 1977-12-06 for smoking pipe. Invention is credited to Charles W. Frost.
| United States Patent | D246,603 |
| Frost | December 6, 1977 |
Smoking pipe
Claims
The ornamental design for a smoking pipe, as shown.
| Inventors: | Frost; Charles W. (Columbia, SC) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/637,045 |
| Filed: | December 2, 1975 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D27/163 |
| Current International Class: | D2702 |
| Field of Search: | ;D27/2-5,7,51 ;D32/1R ;131/17R,17A,173,171R,171A,178,186,187,191,200 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 648891 | May 1900 | Abbot |
| 2222657 | November 1940 | Gandy |
| 2933091 | April 1960 | Ostergard |
| 503,793 | Jul 1930 | DD | |||
Assistant Examiner: Zarfas; Louis S.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Roberts, Jr.; John S.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a smoking pipe showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a longitudinal sectional view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 