Putter
Thiel August 16, 1
U.S. patent number D245,437 [Application Number 05/658,166] was granted by the patent office on 1977-08-16 for putter. Invention is credited to Joseph W. Thiel.
| United States Patent | D245,437 |
| Thiel | August 16, 1977 |
Putter
Claims
The ornamental design for a putter, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Thiel; Joseph W. (Arvada, CO) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/658,166 |
| Filed: | February 17, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/745; 473/252 |
| Current International Class: | D2102 |
| Field of Search: | ;D34/5GH,5GC ;273/167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,163R,164 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 3134596 | May 1964 | Boznos |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Spangler, Jr.; Edwin L.
Description
FIG. 1 is a right side elevation showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevation thereof;
FIG. 3 is a left side elevation thereof; and,
FIG. 4 is a top plan view of the head alone to a greatly enlarged scale.
The bottom is plain and the shaft and handgrip are of conventional design. The novelty lies in the decorative insert of a rattlesnake rattle visible to the user through a transparent window in the top of the head.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 