Doghouse
Higo July 26, 1
U.S. patent number D245,190 [Application Number 05/674,640] was granted by the patent office on 1977-07-26 for doghouse. Invention is credited to Hiromi Higo.
| United States Patent | D245,190 |
| Higo | July 26, 1977 |
Doghouse
Claims
The ornamental design for doghouse, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Higo; Hiromi (Richmond, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/674,640 |
| Filed: | April 7, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D30/108 |
| Current International Class: | D3002 |
| Field of Search: | ;D30/1-18 ;119/19 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D200298 | February 1965 | Daniel |
| D203972 | March 1966 | Daugherty |
| D208089 | July 1967 | Leonard |
| D215306 | September 1969 | Hoff |
| D237283 | October 1975 | Evans |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Carter; Kellard A.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a doghouse showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is an elevational view taken from one side thereof;
FIG. 4 is an elevational view taken from the side opposite that shown in FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 