Lamp
Baca June 28, 1
U.S. patent number D244,875 [Application Number 05/491,566] was granted by the patent office on 1977-06-28 for lamp. Invention is credited to Joseph B. Baca.
| United States Patent | D244,875 |
| Baca | June 28, 1977 |
Lamp
Claims
The ornamental design for a lamp, as shown.
| Inventors: | Baca; Joseph B. (Denver, CO) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/491,566 |
| Filed: | July 24, 1974 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D26/105 |
| Current International Class: | D2605 |
| Field of Search: | ;D48/2R,2A,2 ;D29/28R ;D27/10,12 ;D7/6,11,22,23 ;D35/3A ;D6/20,55 ;240/81R,1R |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D178073 | June 1956 | Leech |
| 2063504 | December 1936 | Horwitt et al. |
| 2416802 | March 1947 | Roung |
Other References
|
Premium Practice Apr. 1961, p. 114 Lamp.. |
Primary Examiner: Lucas; Susan J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Crandell; Ralph F.
Description
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of a lamp embodying my new design.
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof.
FIG. 3 is a perspective view thereof.
FIG. 4 is a front elevational view thereof, the rear elevational view being the same.
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 