Water sweeper
Poston May 31, 1
U.S. patent number D244,532 [Application Number 05/660,107] was granted by the patent office on 1977-05-31 for water sweeper. Invention is credited to George L. Poston.
| United States Patent | D244,532 |
| Poston | May 31, 1977 |
Water sweeper
Claims
The ornamental design for a water sweeper, as shown.
| Inventors: | Poston; George L. (Dallas, TX) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/660,107 |
| Filed: | February 23, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D32/15 |
| Current International Class: | D2301 |
| Field of Search: | ;D23/17,18,32-39 ;239/287 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D201240 | June 1965 | Beinert |
| D229932 | January 1974 | Goodrich |
| 2692163 | October 1954 | Geel |
| 2889994 | June 1959 | French |
Other References
|
Home Furnishings Daily, Sept. 24, 1962, p. 43, "Cal-Dak"item.. |
Primary Examiner: Largen; James R.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Garland; H. Mathews
Description
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of a water sweeper showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof; and
FIG. 4 is an enlarged bottom perspective view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 