Ducted fan aircraft
Adams March 29, 1
U.S. patent number D243,837 [Application Number 05/670,144] was granted by the patent office on 1977-03-29 for ducted fan aircraft. Invention is credited to James T. Adams.
| United States Patent | D243,837 |
| Adams | March 29, 1977 |
Ducted fan aircraft
Claims
The ornamental design for a ducted fan aircraft, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Adams; James T. (King of Prussia, PA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/670,144 |
| Filed: | March 25, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D12/330; D12/333 |
| Current International Class: | D1207 |
| Field of Search: | ;D12/74,5,79 ;244/17.23,23A |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D188359 | July 1960 | Le Bel |
| D216842 | March 1970 | Bertelsen |
| D220293 | March 1971 | Patrieny |
| 3082977 | March 1963 | Arlin |
| 3481559 | December 1969 | Apostolescu |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Paul, Jr.; Henry N.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a ducted fan aircraft showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a bottom view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a front elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a rear elevational view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 