Hoof pick
Cullen March 1, 1
U.S. patent number D243,541 [Application Number 05/623,898] was granted by the patent office on 1977-03-01 for hoof pick. Invention is credited to Clint C. Cullen.
| United States Patent | D243,541 |
| Cullen | March 1, 1977 |
Hoof pick
Claims
The ornamental design for a hoof pick, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Cullen; Clint C. (Newbury Park, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/623,898 |
| Filed: | October 20, 1975 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D30/158 |
| Current International Class: | D3099 |
| Field of Search: | ;D30/19,31,35,99,44,45,40 ;168/48,44 ;D7/182,181 ;15/236R ;D8/88-89,16,105,275 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 274570 | March 1883 | Davis |
| 490474 | January 1893 | Faestl |
| D22794 | September 1893 | Sullivan |
| D45644 | April 1914 | Michelin |
| D177779 | May 1956 | Turner et al. |
Assistant Examiner: Word; George P.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Pastoriza; Ralph B.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a hoof pick showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view;
FIG. 5 is a left end elevational view; and
FIG. 6 is a right end elevational view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 