Barbecue grill
Vida February 22, 1
U.S. patent number D243,436 [Application Number 05/679,987] was granted by the patent office on 1977-02-22 for barbecue grill. Invention is credited to Kenneth J. Vida.
| United States Patent | D243,436 |
| Vida | February 22, 1977 |
Barbecue grill
Claims
The ornamental design for a barbecue grill, as shown.
| Inventors: | Vida; Kenneth J. (Culver City, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/679,987 |
| Filed: | April 26, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/332 |
| Current International Class: | D0704 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/107-110,129,130 ;D6/85 ;126/25,9,29,30 ;99/416,418,444,446,448-450 ;211/195 ;248/165,188.1,188.6 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 3149623 | September 1964 | Orr, Jr. |
| 3570469 | March 1971 | Jones |
| 3905286 | September 1975 | Le Grady |
| 879,057 | 1943 | FR | |||
Assistant Examiner: Kemper; Catherine
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Fulwider; Robert W.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a barbecue grill showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 