System and method for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and global thermostat using the same

Eisenberger , et al. November 25, 2

Patent Grant 8894747

U.S. patent number 8,894,747 [Application Number 14/019,328] was granted by the patent office on 2014-11-25 for system and method for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and global thermostat using the same. The grantee listed for this patent is Graciela Chichilnisky, Peter Eisenberger. Invention is credited to Graciela Chichilnisky, Peter Eisenberger.


United States Patent 8,894,747
Eisenberger ,   et al. November 25, 2014

System and method for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and global thermostat using the same

Abstract

A system for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere to reduce global warming including an air extraction system that collects carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through a medium and removes carbon dioxide from the medium; a sequestration system that isolates the removed carbon dioxide to a location for at least one of storage and which can increase availability of renewable energy or non-fuel products such as fertilizers and construction materials; and one or more energy sources that supply process heat to the air extraction system to remove the carbon dioxide from the medium and which can regenerate it for continued use.


Inventors: Eisenberger; Peter (Princeton, NJ), Chichilnisky; Graciela (New York, NY)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

Eisenberger; Peter
Chichilnisky; Graciela

Princeton
New York

NJ
NY

US
US
Family ID: 40071181
Appl. No.: 14/019,328
Filed: September 5, 2013

Prior Publication Data

Document Identifier Publication Date
US 20140004016 A1 Jan 2, 2014

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
12868915 Aug 26, 2010
12124864 May 21, 2008
11825468 Jul 6, 2007
11805477 May 22, 2007
11805271 May 21, 2007

Current U.S. Class: 95/139; 423/220
Current CPC Class: B01D 53/1425 (20130101); B01D 53/1475 (20130101); B01D 53/1418 (20130101); B01D 53/62 (20130101); F23J 15/02 (20130101); B01D 53/04 (20130101); B01D 2251/304 (20130101); Y02A 50/2342 (20180101); Y02C 20/40 (20200801); Y02C 10/04 (20130101); B01D 2257/504 (20130101); B01D 2258/0233 (20130101); Y02A 50/20 (20180101); Y02C 10/06 (20130101); Y02E 20/326 (20130101); B01D 2251/604 (20130101); Y02E 20/32 (20130101); Y02C 10/08 (20130101)
Current International Class: B01D 53/02 (20060101)
Field of Search: ;95/139 ;423/220

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
3466138 September 1969 Kostas et al.
3491031 January 1970 Stoneburner
3725387 April 1973 McClendon et al.
3865924 February 1975 Gidaspow et al.
3880981 April 1975 Garingarao
3948627 April 1976 Schwarz et al.
4047894 September 1977 Kuhl et al.
4152217 May 1979 Eisenberg et al.
4197421 April 1980 Steinberg
4239515 December 1980 Yanagioka et al.
4243613 January 1981 Brockhaus et al.
4285918 August 1981 Gustafson
4455153 June 1984 Jakahi
4472178 September 1984 Kumar
4497641 February 1985 Brown et al.
4528248 July 1985 Galbraith
4579723 April 1986 Weltmer et al.
4711645 December 1987 Kumar
4762528 August 1988 Reichl
4810266 March 1989 Zinnen et al.
4822383 April 1989 Brose et al.
5061455 October 1991 Brose et al.
5087597 February 1992 Leal et al.
5364887 November 1994 Konig et al.
5376614 December 1994 Birbara et al.
5424051 June 1995 Nagji et al.
5443804 August 1995 Parker et al.
5492683 February 1996 Birbara et al.
5520894 May 1996 Heesink et al.
5593475 January 1997 Minh
5595238 January 1997 Mark et al.
5635142 June 1997 Ichiki et al.
5642630 July 1997 Abdelmalek et al.
5653785 August 1997 Horio et al.
5876488 March 1999 Birbara et al.
5879432 March 1999 Morlec et al.
5906806 May 1999 Clark
5928806 July 1999 Olah et al.
5958353 September 1999 Eyal
6004381 December 1999 Rohrbach et al.
6048509 April 2000 Kawai et al.
6090186 July 2000 Spencer
6106595 August 2000 Spencer
6117404 September 2000 Mimura et al.
6174506 January 2001 Chakravarti et al.
6364938 April 2002 Birbara et al.
6387337 May 2002 Pennline et al.
6540936 April 2003 Takagi et al.
6547854 April 2003 Gray et al.
6612485 September 2003 Lackner et al.
6790430 September 2004 Lackner et al.
6797039 September 2004 Spencer
6800331 October 2004 Bilyk et al.
6873267 March 2005 Tubel et al.
6890497 May 2005 Rau et al.
6908497 June 2005 Sirwardane
6929680 August 2005 Krushnevych et al.
7128777 October 2006 Spencer
7132090 November 2006 Dziedzic et al.
7141859 November 2006 DeBoer et al.
7288136 October 2007 Gray et al.
7385012 June 2008 Chang et al.
7452406 November 2008 Little et al.
7988766 May 2009 White et al.
7655069 February 2010 Wright et al.
7658994 February 2010 Lakshmi
7666250 February 2010 Blencoe et al.
7699909 April 2010 Lackner et al.
7708806 May 2010 Wright et al.
7795175 September 2010 Olah et al.
7799310 September 2010 Lackner et al.
7833328 November 2010 Lackner et al.
7909911 March 2011 Lackner et al.
7947239 May 2011 Lackner et al.
7976897 July 2011 Bhat et al.
7993432 August 2011 Wright et al.
8043594 October 2011 Lackner et al.
8083836 December 2011 Wright et al.
8088197 January 2012 Wright et al.
8118914 February 2012 Liu et al.
8123842 February 2012 Pan et al.
8133305 March 2012 Lackner et al.
8163066 April 2012 Eisenberger
8491705 July 2013 Choi et al.
8529664 September 2013 Deckman et al.
2001/0004895 June 2001 Preiss
2001/0047995 December 2001 Pozgainer et al.
2002/0000260 January 2002 Palvoelgyi et al.
2002/0083833 July 2002 Nalette et al.
2002/0187372 December 2002 Hall et al.
2003/0061906 April 2003 Knunz et al.
2003/0075012 April 2003 Knunz et al.
2004/0142888 July 2004 Manne et al.
2004/0213705 October 2004 Blencoe
2004/0229045 November 2004 Hesselmans et al.
2004/0253159 December 2004 Hakka et al.
2005/0180910 August 2005 Park et al.
2006/0051274 March 2006 Wright et al.
2006/0084063 April 2006 Costa et al.
2006/0101945 May 2006 Lackner et al.
2006/0105419 May 2006 Blankenberg et al.
2006/0165574 July 2006 Sayari
2006/0168940 August 2006 Offenhuber et al.
2006/0178989 August 2006 Lackner et al.
2006/0186562 August 2006 Wright et al.
2006/0188423 August 2006 Cadours et al.
2006/0289003 December 2006 Lackner et al.
2007/0004023 January 2007 Trachtenberg
2007/0033767 February 2007 Dodson et al.
2007/0065490 March 2007 Schaberg et al.
2007/0068525 March 2007 Offenhuber et al.
2007/0086909 April 2007 Abenthung et al.
2007/0187247 August 2007 Lackner et al.
2007/0209349 September 2007 Ripper et al.
2008/0031801 February 2008 Lackner et al.
2008/0064184 March 2008 Lackner et al.
2008/0087165 April 2008 Wright et al.
2008/0112868 May 2008 Blencoe
2008/0124666 May 2008 Stocker et al.
2008/0138265 June 2008 Lackner et al.
2008/0187755 August 2008 Herfert et al.
2008/0190567 August 2008 Winsness et al.
2008/0227169 September 2008 Benson et al.
2008/0250715 October 2008 Cooper et al.
2008/0289319 November 2008 Eisenberger et al.
2008/0289495 November 2008 Eisenberger et al.
2008/0289499 November 2008 Eisenberger et al.
2008/0289500 November 2008 Eisenberger et al.
2009/0101050 April 2009 Lackner et al.
2009/0232861 September 2009 Wright et al.
2009/0320368 December 2009 Castaldi et al.
2010/0095842 April 2010 Lackner et al.
2010/0105126 April 2010 Wright et al.
2010/0116137 May 2010 Wright et al.
2010/0202937 August 2010 Lackner et al.
2010/0263534 October 2010 Chuang
2011/0027143 February 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0027157 February 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0033357 February 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0033358 February 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0041688 February 2011 Eisenberger
2011/0041699 February 2011 Eisenberger
2011/0056382 March 2011 Lackner et al.
2011/0079144 April 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0079146 April 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0079147 April 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0079149 April 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0079150 April 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0081709 April 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0081710 April 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0081712 April 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0083554 April 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0088550 April 2011 Tirio
2011/0108421 May 2011 Lackner et al.
2011/0146281 June 2011 Lackner et al.
2011/0185897 August 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0189075 August 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0203174 August 2011 Lackner
2011/0203311 August 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0206588 August 2011 Lackner
2011/0226006 September 2011 Lackner et al.
2011/0268636 November 2011 Lackner et al.
2011/0293503 December 2011 Wright et al.
2011/0296872 December 2011 Eisenberger
2012/0058032 March 2012 Lackner et al.
2012/0076711 March 2012 Gebald
Foreign Patent Documents
1709553 Dec 2005 CN
200 01 385 Sep 2000 DE
20021180511 Feb 2002 EP
20021234947 Aug 2002 EP
19842543946 Oct 1984 FR
58 122022 Jul 1983 JP
198459216839 Dec 1984 JP
03-245811 Jan 1991 JP
06-062677 Mar 1994 JP
07-051537 Feb 1995 JP
11-244652 Sep 1999 JP
2001-300250 Oct 2001 JP
2003-326155 Nov 2003 JP
2006-061758 Mar 2006 JP
2006-075717 Mar 2006 JP
WO9608678 Mar 1996 WO
WO9829187 Jul 1998 WO
WO2005026694 Mar 2005 WO
WO2005037746 Apr 2005 WO
WO2005108297 Nov 2005 WO
WO2006009600 Jan 2006 WO
WO2006036396 Apr 2006 WO
WO2008042919 Apr 2008 WO
WO2008063082 May 2008 WO

Other References

Stolaroff, Joshuah et al. "A Pilot-scale prototype contractor for CO2 capture from ambient air; cost and energy requirements." (2006) www.ucalgary.ca/.about.keith/papers/84.Stolaroff.Air . . . . cited by applicant .
English abstract, CN 1 303 910 A (Jul. 18, 2001) as cited in U.S. Patent No. 7,795,175. cited by applicant .
English abstract, JP 2006-021989 A (Jan. 26, 2006) as cited in U.S. Patent No. 7,795,175. cited by applicant .
Xu et al., "Preparations and characterization of novel CO2 `molecular basket` absorbents based on polymer-modified mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-41." Microporus and Mesoporus Materials 62: 29-45 (2003) as cited in U.S. Patent No. 7,795,175. cited by applicant .
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, dated Dec. 18, 2007, from corresponding International application No. PCT/US2007/074615 as cited in U.S. Patent No. 7,795,175. cited by applicant .
Hicks, Jason C. et al.; "Designing Adsorbents for CO2 Capture from Flue GAs-Hyperbranched Aminosilicas Capable of Capturing CO2 Reversibly"; Feb. 2008; J. Amer. Chem. Soc., vol. 130, pp. 2902-2903. cited by applicant .
Gold, Blanchard; "Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle IGCC"; www.globalgreenhousewarming.com. cited by applicant .
Leal, Orlando; "Reversible adsorption of carbon dioxide on amine surface-bonded silica gel"; 1995; Elsevier Science S.A., Inorganica Chimica Acta 240, pp. 183-189. cited by applicant .
Dubey, "Science for sustainability: From capturing carbon dioxide from air to environmental impact of a hydrogen economy," Apr. 2, 2003. cited by applicant .
Vaartstra, Brian A., et al., "Advances in Precursor Development for CVD of Barium-Containing Materials." Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 335, pp. 203-208, 1994 Materials Research Society. cited by applicant .
Park, Jung Woo, et al., "Strontium B-diketonate complexes with polyamine donor ligands: the synthesis and structural characterization of [Sr(thd)2(L)]n (n=2; L=diethylenetriamine, n+1; L=triethylenetetramine, tetraethylenepentamine and tris(2-aminoethyl)amine) complex." Polyhedron 19 (2000) 2547-2555. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Jones; Christopher P
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sutton; Paul J. Magidoff; Barry G.

Parent Case Text



RELATED APPLICATIONS/CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application is a continuation of, and claims priority from application Ser. No. 12/868,915 filed Aug. 26, 2010, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 12/124,864 filed May 21, 2008, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of, and claims priority from, each of the following US Patent Applications: (a) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/825,468, filed on Jul. 6, 2007, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/805,477, filed on May 22, 2007, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/805,271, filed on May 21, 2007, (b) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/805,477, filed on May 22, 2007, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/805,271, filed on May 21, 2007, and (c) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/805,271, filed on May 21, 2007, all of which are entitled "System and Method For Removing Carbon Dioxide From An Atmosphere and Global Thermostat Using The Same". The contents of each of the foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Claims



What is claimed is:

1. A plurality of systems strategically placed across the globe, and coordinated so as to collectively function for extracting CO.sub.2 from the atmosphere to reduce the ambient concentration of CO.sub.2 in the planet's atmosphere, the plurality of systems being in locations geographically dispersed around the planet each capable of producing a negative carbon dioxide effect on a planet's atmosphere by extracting and collecting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere under ambient conditions, each system comprises an air contactor, wherein the air contactor comprises a porous solid pancake shaped substrate, on the surface of which is attached an amine, the substrate-supported amine being capable of absorbing carbon dioxide from the ambient atmosphere, a collector chamber, capable of receiving the substrate with the attached amine from the air contactor, and a source of steam, operatively connected to the collector chamber and heated from a source of process heat remaining from a primary process using a primary energy source, to provide steam at a temperature of less than about 120.degree. C. to the collector chamber, for extracting and collecting carbon dioxide from the sorbent medium and regenerating the sorbent medium, so that the plurality of systems together can effectively extract carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in an economically efficient manner.

2. The plurality of systems of claim 1 wherein each of the plurality of systems further comprises: a sequestration system that removes the carbon dioxide from the collector chamber and isolates the removed carbon dioxide to a location for at least one of sequestration, storage and generation of a renewable carbon fuel or non-fuel products such as fertilizers and construction materials.

3. The plurality of systems of claim 2 wherein the process heat is obtained from an adjacent source of carbon dioxide emissions.

4. The plurality of systems of claim 2 wherein the steam provided to the collector chamber is at a temperature of not greater than 100.degree. C.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein the primary energy sources are selected from the group of primary energy sources consisting of: fossil fuel, geothermal, nuclear, solar, biomass and other renewable energy sources and exothermic chemical processes whose use for a primary process can result in a supply of process heat.

6. The system of claim 4, wherein the location of at least some of the systems is underground.
Description



FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to systems and methods for removing greenhouse gases from an atmosphere, and in particular to systems and methods for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

There is much attention currently focused on trying to achieve three energy related and somewhat conflicting energy related objectives: 1) provide affordable energy for economic development; 2) achieve energy security; and 3) avoid the destructive climate change caused by global warming. Many different approaches are being considered to address climate change, including increasing the use of clean, non polluting renewable energy sources such as biofuels, solar, wind and nuclear, attempting to capture and sequester the carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel plants, as well as increased conservation efforts. Some of these approaches, such as solar power, have had their large scale implementation blocked due to their current high costs as compared to the cost of fossil based electricity, and other approaches, such as nuclear, are restrained by their environmental and security risks. In fact, the infrastructure and supply for renewable energy is so underdeveloped (e.g., only about 0.01% of our energy is provided by solar) that there is no feasible way to avoid using fossil fuels during the rest of this century if we are to have the energy needed for economic prosperity and avoid energy shortfalls that could lead to conflict.

The climate change threat caused by global warming and the more general recognition of our need to use renewable resources that do not harm our planet has grown steadily since the first Earth Day in 1972. It is mostly undisputed that an increase in the amount of so-called greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide (methane and water vapor are the other major greenhouse gases) will increase the temperature of the planet. These greenhouse gases help reduce the amount of heat that escapes from our planet into the atmosphere. The higher the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere the warmer the planet will be. There are complicated feedbacks that cause the amount of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases to change naturally even in the absence of human impact. Climate change throughout geological history has caused many extinctions. The concern about the threat of human induced climate change (i.e., global warming) resulted in the Kyoto Protocol that has been approved by over 165 countries and is an international agreement that commits the developed countries to reduce their carbon emissions.

One reason global warming is thought by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to be a threat is because of the sea level rise resulting from the melting of glaciers and the expansion of the ocean as our planet becomes hotter. Hundreds of millions of people who live just above sea level on islands or on the coasts are threatened by destructive flooding requiring relocation or the building of sea walls if the sea level rises even a meter. There is also a threat to other species from climate change which will destroy ecosystems that cannot adjust to the fast rate of human caused climate change. Additional threats include increased infectious diseases and more extreme weather as well as direct threats from extreme heat.

We can demonstrate the challenge of dealing with global warming using a simple model. Let C.sub.CA(Y.sub.N) represent the carbon dioxide added to the atmosphere in year Y.sub.N in gigatonnes per year. Similarly, let C.sub.EX(Y.sub.N) equal the amount extracted, C.sub.EM(Y.sub.N) the amount emitted by humans and C.sub.N(Y.sub.N) be the amount either added or removed due to natural variations in the carbon cycle. Today, the land stores each year approximately 1.8 gigatonnes (10.sup.9 tonnes) of carbon dioxide and the ocean approximately 10.5 gigatonnes (note carbon dioxide is 3.66 times heavier than carbon), while the amount humans add by emissions is about 24 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide. More generally, we have: C.sub.CA(Y.sub.N)=-C.sub.EX(Y.sub.N)+C.sub.EM(Y.sub.N)+C.sub.N(Y.su- b.N) (1) C.sub.A(Y.sub.N+1)=C.sub.A(Y.sub.N)+C.sub.CA(Y.sub.N) (2)

where C.sub.A(Y.sub.N) is the amount of carbon in the atmosphere in year Y.sub.N, 2780 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide today. Other forms of carbon contribute to global warming, most notably methane, although by weight they represent a small component

If C.sub.EX(Y.sub.N) is set to zero than the only way one could possibly stop adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere would be to reduce our emissions to be equal to the natural uptake. However, C.sub.N(Y.sub.N) itself varies greatly and can be a net addition to the atmosphere from the much larger natural carbon cycle which adds and subtracts carbon at about 750 gigatonnes of carbon per year. It is the shifts in this natural balance that has caused climate change before our species existed and will also continue to do so in the future. Thus, it is clear that there is no solution that only reduces human contributions to carbon dioxide emissions that can remove the risk of climate change. With air extraction and the capability to increase or decrease the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere one can in principle compensate for other greenhouse gases like methane that can change their concentrations and cause climate change.

Accordingly, there is a broadly recognized need for a system and method for reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere created by burning of fossil fuels and for providing a low cost, non-polluting renewable energy source as a substitute for fossil fuels.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A system for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere to reduce global warming and which can increase availability of renewable energy or non-fuel products such as fertilizers and construction materials according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention comprises an air extraction system that collects carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through a medium and removes carbon dioxide from the medium by using process heat to heat the medium, a collection system that isolates the removed carbon dioxide to a location for at least one of sequestration, storage and generation of a renewable carbon fuel, and one or more energy sources that provides a supply of process heat to the air extraction system to remove the carbon dioxide from the medium.

In at least one embodiment, the one or more energy sources are selected from the group of energy sources consisting of: fossil fuel, geothermal, nuclear, solar, biomass and other renewable energy sources.

In at least one embodiment, the air extraction system comprises an air contactor that includes the medium to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

In at least one embodiment, the air contactor is selected from the group of air contactors consisting of: convection towers, absorption pools, packed scrubbing towers, and gaseous separation systems, some having pancake shaped area substrates with a medium that extracts carbon dioxide from the air. In its broadest context, the present invention contemplates structures in which the air is passed into contact with the medium that extracts the CO2. Currently, in the most likely embodiment the structure would have a large area perpendicular to the air flow and be very thin in the direction of air flow with the medium being a porous substrate on to the surface of which the amine or alternative that binds the CO2 is attached--that medium would also have a large cross-section and be very thin like the contactor structure that houses it).

In at least one embodiment, the medium is selected from the group of mediums consisting of: a liquid, a porous solid, a gas and mixtures thereof.

In at least one embodiment, the medium is an NaOH solution.

In at least one embodiment, the medium comprises an amine.

In at least one embodiment, the air extraction system collects carbon dioxide and the sequestration system isolates the removed carbon dioxide.

In at least one embodiment, the location is underground.

In at least one embodiment, the location is at a remote site upwind from one or more other components of the system.

A method for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere to reduce global warming and increase availability of renewable energy according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention comprises the steps of: collecting air from the atmosphere; removing carbon dioxide from the collected air by using process heat to heat the medium that removes the carbon dioxide from the collected air; and isolating the removed carbon dioxide to a location for at least one of sequestration, storage and generation of a renewable carbon fuel, wherein at least one of the collecting, removing and isolating steps is performed using one or more renewable energy sources.

In at least one embodiment, the step of removing comprises absorbing the carbon dioxide using an absorber, preferably an absorber in the form of a medium carried by a large surface area substrate.

In at least one embodiment, the absorber is an NaOH solution.

In at least one embodiment, the absorber comprises an amine, preferably an amine bound to the surface of (carried by) a large surface area porous substrate.

In at least one embodiment, the step of isolating comprises at least one of mineral sequestration or injection as a pressurized gas into geologic formations.

The principles of the present invention can be used to provide a global thermostat for controlling average temperature of a planet's atmosphere, through the use of a plurality of systems according to the principles of the present invention, each of which is capable of producing a negative carbon dioxide effect on a planet's atmosphere by extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and using process heat for extracting carbon dioxide from the medium and to regenerate the sorbent (medium) for another cycle of adsorption. Thus, the plurality of systems together can effectively extract carbon dioxide from the atmosphere at a rate that is faster than the rate at which the carbon dioxide is increasing in the atmosphere (and can generate a renewable carbon fuel using the extracted gases).

Applicants' preferred concept of extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and using process heat to separate carbon dioxide from the collection medium is a significant way of addressing the global warming problem, and goes against the conventional wisdom in the art (and is counterintuitive to those in the art). Specifically, the use of process heat to solve the global warming problem by extracting carbon dioxide (CO2) from the low concentration ambient air is very attractive compared to both the conventional approach of extracting CO2 from high concentration flue gas sources and other schemes known in the art for extracting CO2 from the ambient atmosphere. In the former case it goes directly against conventional wisdom that 300 times lower concentration of the CO2 in ambient atmosphere would expect it to be 300 times more expensive since separation costs are thought to generally scale inversely with the concentration. Thus federally funded efforts have been directed at extracting CO2 from the flue gas emissions of power plants (e.g. clean coal) and experts have publicly claimed that the use of ambient air as opposed to flue gas makes no sense. However, the large infinite size of the ambient air source compared to the finite flue gas source and sources generally is one feature that enables applicants' approach to be effective in spite of conventional wisdom and practice. In the flue gas case the emissions containing the CO2 are at a higher temperature (65-70 degrees centigrade) and therefore regeneration uses higher temperature heat which is more costly than is needed for the cool ambient air (approximately 25-30 degrees centigrade). There are other benefits of applicants' approach including the ability to use very thin separation devices that also provide further process improvements. Thus, it could be less costly to remove CO2 by piping the process heat to a global thermostat facility that operates on the principles of applicants' invention, rather than cleaning up directly its flue emissions. In addition, the applicants' approach would produce negative carbon, actually reducing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, while cleaning up the flue gas would only prevent the CO2 content in the air from increasing.

Further analysis shows that one cannot solve the global warming problem in a timely manner to reduce the great risk it poses by simply cleaning up large stationary fossil fuel sources like coal plants or for that matter by conservation or use of renewables. One needs to actually be able, as is the case in this invention, to extract CO2 from the atmosphere ("negative carbon") thus reducing the ambient concentration and reducing the thereat of global warming. Other published schemes for extracting CO2 from the ambient atmosphere have used higher temperature heat generally and not process heat specifically and therefore have not been seriously considered because of their high energy costs.

Additionally, it should be noted that applicants' preferred concept for extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere comprises using a large area substrate perpendicular to the air flow, which could be porous with a high surface area, with a medium (e.g. an amine) that removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and using process heat to remove carbon dioxide from the medium. Using a relatively large area substrate perpendicular to the direction of air flow is particularly useful, because of the relatively low concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (as opposed to the relatively high concentration that would normally be found in flue gases, for example).

These and other features of this invention are described in, or are apparent from, the following detailed description (and accompanying drawings) of various exemplary embodiments of this invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various exemplary embodiments of this invention will be described in detail, with reference to the following figures, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a generalized block diagram of a system for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an air extraction system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a map illustrating a global thermostat according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a system for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of one version of a medium for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and for removing carbon dioxide from the medium, according to the principles of the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of another version of a medium for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and for removing carbon dioxide from the medium, according to the principles of the present invention;

FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of still another version of a medium for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and for removing carbon dioxide from the medium, according to the principles of the present invention; and

FIG. 9 is a schematic illustration of yet another version of a medium for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and for removing carbon dioxide from the medium, according to the principles of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

FIG. 1 is a generalized block diagram of a system, generally designated by reference number 1, for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The system 1 includes an air extraction system 40 and a collection system 50, that isolates the removed carbon dioxide to a location for at least one of sequestration, storage and generation of a renewable carbon fuel or the generation of a non-fuel product such as fertilizer and construction materials. The air extraction system 40 preferably incorporates any known or later-discovered CO.sub.2 extraction method, including methods which use a medium to absorb and/or bind CO.sub.2 from the atmospheric air by exposing the medium to chemical, electrical and/or physical interaction with the CO.sub.2 in the captured air. The medium may be liquid, gaseous or solid, or a combination of liquid, gaseous and solid substances, where in the case of solids, the substance is preferably porous. The medium is preferably recyclable so that after the CO.sub.2 is captured by the medium and separated from the medium for sequestration, the medium can be reused for absorption/binding of additional CO.sub.2. However, in other embodiments the medium may be sequestered along with the captured CO.sub.2. As shown in FIG. 1, the separation of the CO.sub.2 from the medium, as well as other processes such as the absorption/binding of CO.sub.2 and the sequestration of the CO.sub.2 performed by the sequestration system 50, may be made more efficient by the addition of heat to the air extraction system 40. In the present invention, the heat is process heat generated e.g. by a solar energy generator, such as a solar collector, to be described in further detail below. In other embodiments, process heat may be provided by other types of energy sources, such as, for example, fossil fuel, geothermal, nuclear, biomass, and other renewable energy sources. The term "process heat" as used herein refers to the lower temperature heat remaining after the higher temperature heat has been used to generate electricity. More generally, the term "process heat" refers to any low temperature heat remaining after a primary process or that is added by the process itself, such as, for example, exothermic carbonation reactions in which carbon dioxide is stored as a mineral or in fact when it binds to the medium and is captured. Moreover, "process heat" may be provided from the use of sources of energy to produce products other than power or electrical generation. For example, primary processing such as chemical processing, production of cement, steel or aluminum, production of energy products like coal to liquid energy products, refining, may use heat to drive the primary processing, and the unused heat remaining after the primary processing or created during the primary processing would be the process heat of such processing, and can be used in a system or method according to the principles of the present invention.

Applicants' preferred concept of extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and using process heat to separate carbon dioxide from the collection medium is a significant way of addressing the global warming problem, and goes against the conventional wisdom in the art (and is counterintuitive to those in the art). Specifically, the use of process heat to solve the global warming problem by extracting carbon dioxide (CO2) from the low concentration ambient air is very attractive compared to both the conventional approach of extracting CO2 from high concentration flue gas sources and other schemes known in the art for extracting CO2 from the ambient atmosphere. In the former case it goes directly against conventional wisdom that 300 times lower concentration of the CO2 in ambient atmosphere would expect it to be 300 times more expensive since separation costs are thought to generally scale inversely with the concentration. Thus federally funded efforts have been directed at extracting CO2 from the flue gas emissions of power plants (e.g. clean coal) and experts have publicly claimed that the use of ambient air as opposed to flue gas makes no sense. However, the large infinite size of the ambient air source compared to the finite flue gas source and sources generally is one feature that enables applicants' approach to be effective in spite of conventional wisdom and practice. In the flue gas case the emissions containing the CO2 are at a higher temperature (65-70 degrees centigrade) and therefore regeneration uses higher temperature heat which is more costly than is needed for the cool ambient air (approximately 25-30 degrees centigrade). There are other benefits of applicants' approach including the ability to use very thin separation devices that also provide further process improvements. Thus, it could be less costly to remove CO2 by piping the process heat to a global thermostat facility that operates on the principles of applicants' invention, rather than cleaning up directly its flue emissions. In addition, the applicants' approach would produce negative carbon, actually reducing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, while cleaning up the flue gas would only prevent the CO2 content in the air from increasing.

Further analysis shows that one cannot solve the global warming problem in a timely manner to reduce the great risk it poses by simply cleaning up large stationary fossil fuel sources like coal plants or for that matter by conservation or use of renewables. One needs to actually be able, as is the case in this invention, to extract CO2 from the atmosphere ("negative carbon") thus reducing the ambient concentration and reducing the threat of global warming. Other published schemes for extracting CO2 from the ambient atmosphere have used higher temperature heat generally and not process heat specifically and therefore have not been seriously considered because of their high energy costs.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system, generally designated by reference number 2, for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The system 2 includes a solar collector 10, an optional supplemental energy source 20, a power generator 30, an air extraction system 42 and a collection system 50. Each of these components of the system 1 are explained in detail below.

The solar collector 10 may be any known or future-discovered solar energy collection system, which may include solar energy collection units, such as, for example, concentrated solar power parabolic mirrors, and concentrated solar power towers. As is known in the art, the solar collector 10 converts solar energy to thermal energy, which may be used to drive the power generator 30. Residual thermal energy (i.e., process heat) may be used to drive the air extraction system 42 and/or the collection system 50. For example, the process heat may be used to improve the efficiency of chemical and/or physical reactions used in the air extraction system 42 to absorb CO.sub.2 from the air and/or to drive off the CO.sub.2 from the medium. In addition, in other exemplary embodiments, as shown by the dashed arrows in FIG. 2, direct heat from the solar collector 10 may be used to drive the air extraction system 42 and/or the collection system 50.

The power generator 30 may be, for example, a thermal power generator that converts the thermal energy provided by the solar collector to electricity. As is known in the art, the suns heat may be focused on a medium, such as molten salts, that is then used to generate high temperature, high pressure steam that drives a turbine to generate electricity. The generated electricity may then be used to power the other components of the system 2, in addition to providing power to the general population as part of a power grid. In this regard, the thermal energy provided by the solar collector 10 may be supplemented by energy generated by the supplemental energy source 20. For example, the supplemental energy source 20 may be a waste incineration plant, which provides additional thermal energy to drive the power generator 30. Also, it should be appreciated that any other type of renewable energy source may be used in addition to solar energy, and preferably a renewable energy source that produces heat as a precursor to the generation of electricity. Other potential renewable energy sources to be used in addition to solar energy include, for example, nuclear, biomass, and geothermal energy sources.

Alternatively, the power generator 30 may be any known or later discovered fossil fuel facility (plant) that relies on the burning of fossil fuels, such as, for example, coal, fuel oil, natural gas and oil shale, for the generation of electricity. The power generator may also be for a purpose other than generating electricity (for example the power generator could be for chemical processing, or various other purposes like producing aluminum). The thermal energy produced by the fossil fuel power plant 30 is used to produce electricity and the residual thermal energy (i.e., process heat) may be used to drive the air extraction system 42 and/or the sequestration system 50. For example, the process heat from the fossil fuel power plant 30 may be used to improve the efficiency of chemical and/or physical reactions used in the air extraction system 42 to absorb CO.sub.2 from the air and/or to drive off the CO.sub.2 from the medium. The residual heat provided by the fossil fuel power plant 30 may be supplemented by energy generated by a supplemental energy source. For example, the supplemental energy source may be a waste incineration plant or a renewable energy source, such as, for example, solar, nuclear, biomass, and geothermal energy sources, which provides additional thermal energy to drive the air extraction system 42 and/or the collection system 50. Process heat from the supplemental energy source may also be used to drive the air extraction system 42 and/or the collection system 50.

Moreover, as described above, "process heat" may be provided from the use of sources of energy to produce products other than power or electrical generation. For example, primary processing such as chemical processing, production of cement, steel or aluminum, refining, production of energy products like coal and liquid energy products, may use heat to drive the primary processing, and the unused heat remaining after the primary processing or created during the primary processing would be the process heat of such processing, and can be used in a system or method according to the principles of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the air extractor system 42 useable with the system 2 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The air extractor system 42 includes an air contactor 41, a causticizer 43, a slaker 45, a calciner 47 and a capture unit 49. The air contactor 41 may use a sorbent material to selectively capture CO.sub.2 from the air, and may be composed of any known or later-discovered contactor structures, such as, for example, large convection towers, open, stagnant pools, and packed scrubbing towers. In the present embodiment, the sorbent material may be sodium hydroxide (NaOH), which readily absorbs CO.sub.2 from the air. It should be appreciated that other known or future-discovered capture methods may be used, such as, for example, chemical absorption, physical and chemical adsorption, low-temperature distillation, gas-separation membranes, mineralization/biomineralization and vegetation. As a further example, as known in the art, aqueous amine solutions or amine enriched solid sorbents may be used to absorb CO.sub.2. Preferably, the sorbent material is regenerated and the capture method requires less than about 100-120.degree. C. heat to regenerate the sorbent material.

In this embodiment, at the air contactor 41, CO.sub.2 may be absorbed into an NaOH solution forming sodium carbonate (Na.sub.2CO.sub.3), e.g. in the manner described by Stolaroff et all in an article entitled "A pilot-scale prototype contactor for CO2 capture from ambient air: cost and energy requirements", which article can be found at www.ucalgary.ca/.about.keith/papers/84.Stolaroff.AirCaptureGHGT-8.p.pdf, and is incorporated herein by reference. Of course, other known or future-developed absorbers may also be used as an alternative or in addition to an NaOH solution. The generated Na.sub.2CO.sub.3 is then sent to the causticizer 43, where the NaOH is regenerated by addition of lime (CaO) in a batch process. The resulting CaCO.sub.3 solid is sent to the calciner 47 where it is heated in a kiln to regenerate the CaO, driving off the CO.sub.2 in a process known as calcination. The regenerated CaO is then sent through the slaker 45, which produces slaked lime Ca(OH).sub.2 for use in the causticizer 43.

The capture unit 49 captures the CO.sub.2 driven off at the calciner 47 using any know or later-discovered CO.sub.2 capturing method that is effective in the low concentrations in which CO.sub.2 is present in the atmosphere and that needs only low temperature heat for regeneration. For example, the capture unit 49 may use an amine based capture system, such as the system described in Gray et al U.S. Pat. No. 6,547,854, dated Apr. 15, 2003, and also Sirwardane U.S. Pat. No. 6,908,497, dated Jun. 21, 2005, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. The capture unit 49 may also compress the captured CO.sub.2 to liquid form so that the CO.sub.2 may be more easily sequestered.

The collection system 50 isolates the removed carbon dioxide to a location for at least one of sequestration, storage and generation of a renewable carbon fuel or the generation of a non-fuel product such as fertilizer and construction materials. The collection system 50 may use any known or future-discovered carbon, sequestration and/or storing techniques, such as, for example, injection into geologic formations or mineral sequestration. In the case of injection, the captured CO.sub.2 may be sequestered in geologic formations such as, for example, oil and gas reservoirs, unmineable coal seams and deep saline reservoirs. In this regard, in many cases, injection of CO.sub.2 into a geologic formation may enhance the recovery of hydrocarbons, providing the value-added byproducts that can offset the cost of CO.sub.2 capture and collection. For example, injection of CO.sub.2 into an oil or natural gas reservoir pushes out the product in a process known as enhanced oil recovery. The captured CO.sub.2 may be sequestered underground, and according to at least one embodiment of the invention at a remote site upwind from the other components of the system 2 so that any leakage from the site is re-captured by the system 2.

In regards to mineral sequestration, CO.sub.2 may be sequestered by a carbonation reaction with calcium and magnesium silicates, which occur naturally as mineral deposits. For example, as shown in reactions (1) and (2) below, CO.sub.2 may be reacted with forsterite and serpentine, which produces solid calcium and magnesium carbonates in an exothermic reaction. 1/2Mg.sub.2SiO.sub.4+CO.sub.2.dbd.MgCO.sub.3+1/2SiO.sub.2+95 kJ/mole (1) 1/3Mg.sub.3Si.sub.2O.sub.5(OH).sub.4+CO.sub.2.dbd.MgCO.sub.3+2/3SiO.sub.2- +2/3H.sub.2O+64 kJ/mole (2)

Both of these reactions are favored at low temperatures. In this regard, both the air capture and air sequestration processes described herein may use electricity and/or thermal energy generated by the solar collector 10 (or other renewable energy source) to drive the necessary reactions and power the appropriate system components. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a high temperature carrier may be heated up to a temperature in a range of about 400.degree. C. to about 500.degree. C. to generate steam to run a generator for electricity, and the lower temperature steam that exits from the electrical generating turbines can be used to drive off the CO.sub.2 and regenerate the sorbent (e.g., NaOH). The temperature of the high temperature heat, the generated electricity and the temperature of the lower temperature process heat remaining after electricity production can be adjusted to produce the mix of electricity production and CO.sub.2 removal that is considered optimal for a given application. In addition, in exemplary embodiments, still lower temperature process heat that emerges out of the capture and sequestration steps may be used to cool equipment used in these steps.

One or more systems for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere may be used as part of a global thermostat according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. By regulating the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and hence the greenhouse effect caused by carbon dioxide and other gas emissions, the system described herein may be used to alter the global average temperature. According to at least one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, several carbon dioxide capture and sequestration systems may be located at different locations across the globe so that operation of the multiple systems may be used to alter the CO.sub.2 concentration in the atmosphere and thus change the greenhouse gas heating of the planet. Locations may be chosen so as to have the most effect on areas such as large industrial centers and highly populated cities, or natural point sources of CO.sub.2 each of which could create locally higher concentrations of CO.sub.2 that would enable more cost efficient capture. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, multiple systems 1 may be scattered across the globe, and international cooperation, including, for example, international funding and agreements, may be used to regulate the construction and control of the systems 1. In this regard, greenhouse gases concentration can be changed to alter the average global temperature of the planet to avoid cooling and warming periods, which can be destructive to human and ecological systems. During the past history of our planet, for example, there have been many periods of glaciation and rapid temperature swings that have caused destruction and even mass extinctions. Such temperature swings in the future could be a direct cause of massive damage and destabilization of human society from conflicts resulting from potential diminished resources. The global thermostat described herein may be the key to preventing such disasters in the decades to come.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a system, generally designated by reference number 100, for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere according to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The system 100 includes a renewable energy source 110, an optional supplemental energy source 120, a power generator 130, an air extraction system 142 and a collection system 150. The present embodiment differs from the embodiment of FIG. 2 in that the renewable energy source 110 may be any known or future-discovered energy source besides solar, such as, for example, nuclear, geothermal, and biomass energy sources. Preferably, the renewal energy source produces thermal energy, which can be used to produce electricity and to improve the efficiency of the various chemical and/or physical reactions that take place within the air extraction system 142 and the collection system 150. In this regard, the air extraction system 142 and the collection system 150 may be the same as described with reference to the previous embodiment, or may include components according to any other known or future-discovered air extraction and collection systems. In addition, as shown in FIG. 4 with reference to the previous embodiment, a plurality of systems 100 may be strategically placed across the globe, and control of the systems 100 may be coordinated so as to collectively function as a global thermostat.

FIGS. 6-9 are schematic illustrations of several ways that carbon dioxide can be removed from an atmosphere, according to the principles of the present invention.

Specifically, in FIG. 6, a pair of substrate 600, 602 are illustrated, each of which has a medium (e.g. NAOH, an amine) that can be brought into contact with an atmosphere to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The substrates 600, 602 are pancake shaped (in the sense that they are relatively large area compared to their thickness) oriented vertically, and can each be relatively large (in surface area) and relatively thin (e.g. on the order of a few millimeters, and preferably not thicker than a meter). Each substrate can move (e.g. by a pulley system (not shown) between an upper position in which carbon dioxide laden air is brought into contact with the medium carried by the substrate to remove carbon dioxide from the air, and a lower position in which process heat is directed at the substrate to remove carbon dioxide from the medium. The substrates 600, 602 are porous with large surface areas, so that air directed at a substrate can flow through the substrate. When a substrate is in an upper position (e.g. the position of substrate 600), carbon dioxide laden air is directed at the substrate (e.g. by a fan 604 shown in dashed lines), so that as the air flows through the substrate, the carbon dioxide contacts the medium and is substantially removed from the air. Thus, carbon dioxide laden air is directed at and through the substrate so that carbon dioxide comes into contact with the medium, carbon dioxide is substantially removed from the air by the medium, and air from which the carbon dioxide has been substantially removed is directed away from the substrate. When a substrate is moved to the lower position (e.g. the position of substrate 602), process heat is directed at the substrate (e.g. via a fluid conduit 606), and carbon dioxide is removed (drawn off) by a source of fluid that is directed at the substrate (in the direction shown by arrow 608) and a source of suction 610 by which carbon dioxide that has been removed from the medium is drawn away from the substrate. The substrates 600, 602 can alternatively move between the upper and lower positions, so that the substrate in the upper position is removing carbon dioxide from the air and carbon dioxide is being removed from the substrate in the lower position. It should be noted that rather than the fan, if there are strong winds available natural wind flows can be used to drive the air through the substrate. In addition, as described below, the fan can be replaced with a solar driven source (or by either wind or thermally-driven air currents), in which case the efficiency and cost reduction of extraction of carbon dioxide from atmospheric air can be further improved. Moreover, rather than switching the positions of the substrates, the means for generating the air flows, the flow of process heat, and the flow of carbon dioxide away from the substrate can be switched as carbon dioxide is captured from the air and then extracted from the medium, as will be readily apparent to those in the art.

FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of another version of a medium for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and for removing carbon dioxide from the medium, according to the principles of the present invention. Specifically, in FIG. 7, a pair of substrates 700, 702 are illustrated, each of which has a medium (e.g. NAOH, an amine) that can be brought into contact with an atmosphere to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The substrates 700, 702 are oriented horizontally, and can each be relatively large (in surface area) and relatively thin (e.g. on the order of millimeters or centimeters). Each substrate can move horizontally (e.g. by a pulley system (not shown) between an air extraction position in which carbon dioxide laden air is brought into contact with the medium carried by the substrate to remove carbon dioxide from the air, and a carbon extraction position in which process heat is directed at the substrate to remove carbon dioxide from the medium. The substrates 700, 702 are porous, so that air directed at a substrate can flow through the substrate. When a substrate is in an air extraction position (e.g. the position of substrate 700), carbon dioxide laden air is directed at the substrate (e.g. by a fan 704 shown in dashed lines), so that as the air flows through the substrate, the carbon dioxide contacts the medium and is substantially removed from the air. Thus, carbon dioxide laden air is directed at and through the substrate so that carbon dioxide comes into contact with the medium, carbon dioxide is substantially removed from the air by the medium, and air from which the carbon dioxide has been substantially removed is directed away from the substrate. When a substrate is moved to the carbon extraction position (e.g. the position of substrate 702), process heat is directed at the substrate (e.g. via a fluid conduit 706), and carbon dioxide is removed (drawn off) by a source of fluid that is directed at the substrate (in the direction shown by arrow 708) and a source of suction 710 by which carbon dioxide that has been removed from the medium is drawn away from the substrate. The substrates 700, 702 can alternatively move between the air extraction and carbon extraction positions, so that the substrate in the air extraction position is removing carbon dioxide from the air and carbon dioxide is being removed from the substrate in the carbon extraction position It should be noted that rather than the fan, if there are strong winds available natural wind flows can be used to drive the air through the substrate. In addition, as described below, the fan can be replaced with a solar driven source (or by either wind or thermally-driven air currents), in which case the efficiency and cost reduction of extraction of carbon dioxide from atmospheric air can be further improved. Moreover, rather than switching the positions of the substrates, the means for generating the air flows, the flow of process heat, and the flow of carbon dioxide away from the substrate can be switched as carbon dioxide is captured from the air and then extracted from the medium, as will be readily apparent to those in the art.

The version of the invention shown in FIG. 9 is generally similar to the horizontally oriented version of FIG. 7, but in the version of FIG. 9, rather than a fan being the source that moves the carbon laden air through the substrate in the air extraction position (e.g. substrate 900), there is a source of gas flow that is generated from a solar heating tower or chimney (shown schematically at 912 in FIG. 9). A solar chimney can be generated by heating an air mass with the sun. The solar chimney would have a "skirt" (shown in dashed lines 913 in FIG. 9) that enables the solar heated air to be concentrated in the chimney. Thus, a solar field with a solar chimney can be associated with a system and structure that removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and removes carbon dioxide from a medium in the manner shown and described in connection with FIG. 7. However, rather than a fan 704 as the primary driver of carbon dioxide laden air at the substrate, the carbon dioxide laden air is heated by solar energy and that air is allowed to rise in the solar funnel or tower 912. Because of the tendency for the hot air to rise, an upward draft is generated, that would carry with it carbon dioxide laden air, and the substrate 900 would be positioned in the way of that upward draft. Thus, the carbon dioxide laden air would be directed through the substrate 900 in the air extraction position, and carbon dioxide would be removed from the substrate 902 in the carbon extraction position in the same way as shown and described in connection with FIG. 7. By driving the extraction of carbon dioxide from air by solar energy, the costs of extraction are further reduced, and the overall operation is highly renewable. Of course, provision would need to be made for those periods when the sun didn't shine, and some form of driver similar to the fan 704 (FIG. 7) would be needed. But in any case, having periods in which, instead of the fan, replacing the fan with a solar driven source (or by either wind or thermally-driven air currents), the efficiency and cost reduction of extraction of carbon dioxide from atmospheric air can be further improved.

FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of yet another version of a medium for removing carbon dioxide from an atmosphere and for removing carbon dioxide from the medium, according to the principles of the present invention. In FIG. 8, the medium from which carbon dioxide is removed from atmospheric air and from which carbon dioxide is removed from the medium is disposed on a continuously moving substrate 800. The substrate moves through an air extraction zone 814, where carbon dioxide laden air is directed at and through the substrate (which is also porous as with the prior embodiments) so that carbon dioxide is removed from the air. The substrate 800 then moves to a carbon extraction zone 816, where process heat is directed at the substrate and carbon is drawn away from the substrate in the manner described above in connection with FIGS. 6, 7. Then, the substrate 800 moves to and through a heat exchange zone 818 where the temperature of the substrate is lowered (e.g. by the air that flowed through the substrate in the air extraction zone, and by any additional cooling device that may be useful in reducing the temperature of the substrate to a level that enables it to efficiently remove carbon dioxide from the air when the substrate moves back through the extraction zone 814. In addition, the system of FIG. 8 may have another carbon extraction zone 816, where process heat is directed at the substrate and carbon is drawn away from the substrate in the manner described above in connection with FIGS. 6, 7.

It should also be noted that in all of the versions of the invention described above, the removal of carbon dioxide from the air can be at least partially performed under non equilibrium conditions. Additionally, it should be noted that applicants' preferred concept for extracting carbon dioxide from the atmosphere comprises using a relatively thin, large surface area substrate with a medium (e.g. an amine) that removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and using process heat to remove carbon dioxide from the medium. Using a relatively large area substrate perpendicular to the direction of air flow is particularly useful, because of the relatively low concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (as opposed to the relatively high concentration that would normally be found, e.g. in flue gases).

While this invention has been described in conjunction with the exemplary embodiments outlined above, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments of the invention, as set forth above, are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

* * * * *

References


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed