Modular hybrid drill bit

McCormick , et al. January 22, 2

Patent Grant 8356398

U.S. patent number 8,356,398 [Application Number 13/019,929] was granted by the patent office on 2013-01-22 for modular hybrid drill bit. This patent grant is currently assigned to Baker Hughes Incorporated. The grantee listed for this patent is Karlos B. Cepeda, Michael Steven Damschen, Matthew R. Isbell, Tim King Marvel, Ron D. McCormick, Don Q. Nguyen, Rolf Carl Pessier, Steven M. Winnon, Anton F. Zahradnik. Invention is credited to Karlos B. Cepeda, Michael Steven Damschen, Matthew R. Isbell, Tim King Marvel, Ron D. McCormick, Don Q. Nguyen, Rolf Carl Pessier, Steven M. Winnon, Anton F. Zahradnik.


United States Patent 8,356,398
McCormick ,   et al. January 22, 2013

Modular hybrid drill bit

Abstract

An earth-boring bit comprising a bit body is configured at its upper end for connection into a drillstring. A fixed blade depends axially downwardly from the bit body. An axially extending slot is formed in the bit body adjacent the fixed blade. A bit leg is received and retained in the slot by engagement between the slot and correspondingly shaped bit leg, wherein the bit leg cannot be removed from the slot except by axial movement relative to the bit body. A rolling cutter is secured to the bit leg at its lower extent. A fastener secures the bit leg against movement relative to the bit body and extends through oblong apertures in the bit leg and into the bit body, the bit leg can be moved axially relative to the bit body to adjust the projection of the rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade.


Inventors: McCormick; Ron D. (Magnolia, TX), Pessier; Rolf Carl (Galveston, TX), Nguyen; Don Q. (Houston, TX), Marvel; Tim King (The Woodlands, TX), Isbell; Matthew R. (Houston, TX), Zahradnik; Anton F. (Sugar Land, TX), Cepeda; Karlos B. (Houston, TX), Damschen; Michael Steven (Houston, TX), Winnon; Steven M. (Conroe, TX)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

McCormick; Ron D.
Pessier; Rolf Carl
Nguyen; Don Q.
Marvel; Tim King
Isbell; Matthew R.
Zahradnik; Anton F.
Cepeda; Karlos B.
Damschen; Michael Steven
Winnon; Steven M.

Magnolia
Galveston
Houston
The Woodlands
Houston
Sugar Land
Houston
Houston
Conroe

TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX

US
US
US
US
US
US
US
US
US
Assignee: Baker Hughes Incorporated (Houston, TX)
Family ID: 41255854
Appl. No.: 13/019,929
Filed: February 2, 2011

Prior Publication Data

Document Identifier Publication Date
US 20110120269 A1 May 26, 2011

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
12114537 May 2, 2008

Current U.S. Class: 29/525.02; 175/366; 175/336; 29/525.11; 29/525.01
Current CPC Class: E21B 10/62 (20130101); E21B 10/14 (20130101); E21B 10/24 (20130101); Y10T 29/49963 (20150115); Y10T 29/49948 (20150115); Y10T 29/49947 (20150115)
Current International Class: B23P 11/00 (20060101); E21B 10/00 (20060101)
Field of Search: ;175/336,364,366 ;29/525.01,525.02,525.11,525.13,525.14

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
930759 August 1909 Hughes
1388424 September 1921 George
1394769 October 1921 Sorensen
1519641 December 1924 Thompson
1816568 July 1931 Carlson
1821474 September 1931 Mercer
1874066 August 1932 Scott et al.
1879127 September 1932 Schlumpf
1896243 February 1933 Macdonald
1932487 October 1933 Scott
2030722 February 1936 Scott
2117481 May 1938 Howard et al.
2119618 June 1938 Zublin
2198849 April 1940 Waxler
2216894 October 1940 Stancliff
2244537 June 1941 Kammerer
2297157 September 1942 McClinton
2320136 May 1943 Kammerer
2320137 May 1943 Kammerer
2380112 July 1945 Kinnear
RE23416 October 1951 Kinnear
2719026 September 1955 Boice
2815932 December 1957 Wolfram
2994389 August 1961 Bus, Sr.
3010708 November 1961 Hlinsky et al.
3050293 August 1962 Hlinsky
3055443 September 1962 Edwards
3066749 December 1962 Hildebrandt
3126066 March 1964 Williams, Jr.
3126067 March 1964 Schumacher, Jr.
3174564 March 1965 Morlan
3239431 March 1966 Raymond
3250337 May 1966 Demo
3269469 August 1966 Kelly, Jr.
3387673 June 1968 Thompson
3424258 January 1969 Nakayama
3583501 June 1971 Aalund
RE28625 November 1975 Cunningham
4006788 February 1977 Garner
4140189 February 1979 Garner
4190126 February 1980 Kabashima
4270812 June 1981 Thomas
4285409 August 1981 Allen
4293048 October 1981 Kloesel, Jr.
4320808 March 1982 Garrett
4343371 August 1982 Baker, III et al.
4359112 November 1982 Garner et al.
4369849 January 1983 Parrish
4386669 June 1983 Evans
4410284 October 1983 Herrick
4428687 January 1984 Zahradnik
4444281 April 1984 Schumacher, Jr. et al.
4527637 July 1985 Bodine
4572306 February 1986 Dorosz
4657091 April 1987 Higdon
4664705 May 1987 Horton et al.
4690228 September 1987 Voelz et al.
4706765 November 1987 Lee et al.
4726718 February 1988 Meskin et al.
4727942 March 1988 Galle et al.
4738322 April 1988 Hall et al.
4765205 August 1988 Higdon
4874047 October 1989 Hixon
4875532 October 1989 Langford, Jr.
4892159 January 1990 Holster
4915181 April 1990 Labrosse
4932484 June 1990 Warren et al.
4936398 June 1990 Auty et al.
4943488 July 1990 Sung et al.
4953641 September 1990 Pessier
4976324 December 1990 Tibbitts
4984643 January 1991 Isbell et al.
4991671 February 1991 Pearce et al.
5016718 May 1991 Tandberg
5027912 July 1991 Juergens
5028177 July 1991 Meskin et al.
5030276 July 1991 Sung et al.
5049164 September 1991 Horton et al.
5116568 May 1992 Sung et al.
5145017 September 1992 Holster et al.
5176212 January 1993 Tandberg
5224560 July 1993 Fernandez
5238074 August 1993 Tibbitts et al.
5287936 February 1994 Grimes et al.
5289889 March 1994 Gearhart et al.
5337843 August 1994 Torgrimsen et al.
5346026 September 1994 Pessier et al.
5351770 October 1994 Cawthorne et al.
5361859 November 1994 Tibbitts
5429200 July 1995 Blackman et al.
5439068 August 1995 Huffstutler et al.
5452771 September 1995 Blackman et al.
5467836 November 1995 Grimes et al.
5472057 December 1995 Winfree
5472271 December 1995 Bowers et al.
5513715 May 1996 Dysart
5518077 May 1996 Blackman et al.
5547033 August 1996 Campos, Jr.
5553681 September 1996 Huffstutler et al.
5558170 September 1996 Thigpen et al.
5560440 October 1996 Tibbitts
5570750 November 1996 Williams
5593231 January 1997 Ippolito
5606895 March 1997 Huffstutler
5624002 April 1997 Huffstutler
5641029 June 1997 Beaton et al.
5644956 July 1997 Blackman et al.
5655612 August 1997 Grimes et al.
D384084 September 1997 Huffstutler et al.
5695018 December 1997 Pessier et al.
5695019 December 1997 Shamburger, Jr.
5755297 May 1998 Young et al.
5862871 January 1999 Curlett
5868502 February 1999 Cariveau et al.
5873422 February 1999 Hansen et al.
5941322 August 1999 Stephenson et al.
5944125 August 1999 Byrd
5967246 October 1999 Caraway et al.
5979576 November 1999 Hansen et al.
5988303 November 1999 Arfele
5992542 November 1999 Rives
5996713 December 1999 Pessier et al.
6092613 July 2000 Caraway et al.
6095265 August 2000 Alsup
6109375 August 2000 Tso
6116357 September 2000 Wagoner et al.
6173797 January 2001 Dykstra et al.
6220374 April 2001 Crawford
6241034 June 2001 Steinke et al.
6241036 June 2001 Lovato et al.
6250407 June 2001 Karlsson
6260635 July 2001 Crawford
6279671 August 2001 Panigrahi et al.
6283233 September 2001 Lamine et al.
6296069 October 2001 Lamine et al.
RE37450 November 2001 Deken et al.
6345673 February 2002 Siracki
6360831 March 2002 Akesson et al.
6367568 April 2002 Steinke et al.
6386302 May 2002 Beaton
6401844 June 2002 Doster et al.
6405811 June 2002 Borchardt
6408958 June 2002 Isbell et al.
6415687 July 2002 Saxman
6439326 August 2002 Huang et al.
6446739 September 2002 Richman et al.
6450270 September 2002 Saxton
6460635 October 2002 Kalsi et al.
6474424 November 2002 Saxman
6510906 January 2003 Richert et al.
6510909 January 2003 Portwood et al.
6527066 March 2003 Rives
6533051 March 2003 Singh et al.
6544308 April 2003 Griffin et al.
6562462 May 2003 Griffin et al.
6568490 May 2003 Tso et al.
6581700 June 2003 Curlett et al.
6585064 July 2003 Griffin et al.
6589640 July 2003 Griffin et al.
6592985 July 2003 Griffin et al.
6601661 August 2003 Baker et al.
6601662 August 2003 Matthias et al.
6684967 February 2004 Mensa-Wilmot et al.
6729418 May 2004 Slaughter, Jr. et al.
6739214 May 2004 Griffin et al.
6742607 June 2004 Beaton
6745858 June 2004 Estes
6749033 June 2004 Griffin et al.
6797326 September 2004 Griffin et al.
6823951 November 2004 Yong et al.
6843333 January 2005 Richert et al.
6861098 March 2005 Griffin et al.
6861137 March 2005 Griffin et al.
6878447 April 2005 Griffin et al.
6883623 April 2005 McCormick et al.
6902014 June 2005 Estes
6986395 January 2006 Chen
6988569 January 2006 Lockstedt et al.
7096978 August 2006 Dykstra et al.
7111694 September 2006 Beaton
7137460 November 2006 Slaughter, Jr. et al.
7152702 December 2006 Bhome et al.
7197806 April 2007 Boudreaux et al.
7198119 April 2007 Hall et al.
7234550 June 2007 Azar et al.
7270196 September 2007 Hall
7281592 October 2007 Runia et al.
7320375 January 2008 Singh
7350568 April 2008 Mandal et al.
7350601 April 2008 Belnap et al.
7360612 April 2008 Chen et al.
7377341 May 2008 Middlemiss et al.
7387177 June 2008 Zahradnik et al.
7392862 July 2008 Zahradnik et al.
7398837 July 2008 Hall et al.
7416036 August 2008 Forstner et al.
7435478 October 2008 Keshavan
7462003 December 2008 Middlemiss
7473287 January 2009 Belnap et al.
7493973 February 2009 Keshavan et al.
7517589 April 2009 Eyre
7533740 May 2009 Zhang et al.
7568534 August 2009 Griffin et al.
7621346 November 2009 Trinh et al.
7621348 November 2009 Hoffmaster et al.
7703556 April 2010 Smith et al.
7703557 April 2010 Durairajan et al.
7819208 October 2010 Pessier et al.
7836975 November 2010 Chen et al.
7845435 December 2010 Zahradnik et al.
7845437 December 2010 Bielawa et al.
7847437 December 2010 Chakrabarti et al.
8201646 June 2012 Vezirian
2002/0092684 July 2002 Singh et al.
2002/0108785 August 2002 Slaughter, Jr. et al.
2004/0099448 May 2004 Fielder et al.
2004/0238224 December 2004 Runia
2005/0087370 April 2005 Ledgerwood, III et al.
2005/0103533 May 2005 Sherwood, Jr. et al.
2005/0178587 August 2005 Witman, IV et al.
2005/0183892 August 2005 Oldham et al.
2005/0263328 December 2005 Middlemiss
2005/0273301 December 2005 Huang
2006/0032674 February 2006 Chen et al.
2006/0032677 February 2006 Azar et al.
2006/0162969 July 2006 Belnap et al.
2006/0196699 September 2006 Estes et al.
2006/0254830 November 2006 Radtke
2006/0266558 November 2006 Middlemiss et al.
2006/0266559 November 2006 Keshavan et al.
2006/0278442 December 2006 Kristensen
2006/0283640 December 2006 Estes et al.
2007/0029114 February 2007 Middlemiss
2007/0062736 March 2007 Cariveau et al.
2007/0079994 April 2007 Middlemiss
2007/0187155 August 2007 Middlemiss
2007/0221417 September 2007 Hall et al.
2008/0066970 March 2008 Zahradnik et al.
2008/0264695 October 2008 Zahradnik et al.
2008/0296068 December 2008 Zahradnik et al.
2009/0114454 May 2009 Belnap et al.
2009/0120693 May 2009 McClain et al.
2009/0126998 May 2009 Zahradnik et al.
2009/0159338 June 2009 Buske
2009/0159341 June 2009 Pessier et al.
2009/0166093 July 2009 Pessier et al.
2009/0178855 July 2009 Zhang et al.
2009/0183925 July 2009 Zhang et al.
2009/0272582 November 2009 McCormick et al.
2010/0155146 June 2010 Nguyen et al.
2010/0224417 September 2010 Zahradnik et al.
2010/0276205 November 2010 Oxford et al.
2010/0288561 November 2010 Zahradnik et al.
2010/0320001 December 2010 Kulkarni
2011/0024197 February 2011 Centala et al.
2011/0079440 April 2011 Buske et al.
2011/0079441 April 2011 Buske et al.
2011/0079442 April 2011 Buske et al.
2011/0079443 April 2011 Buske et al.
2011/0162893 July 2011 Zhang
2012/0111638 May 2012 Nguyen et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
13 01 784 Aug 1969 DE
0225101 Jun 1987 EP
0157278 Nov 1989 EP
0391683 Jan 1996 EP
0874128 Oct 1998 EP
2089187 Aug 2009 EP
2183694 Jun 1987 GB
2001159289 Jun 2001 JP
1 331 988 Aug 1987 SU
8502223 May 1985 WO
2008124572 Oct 2008 WO
WO 2009064969 May 2009 WO

Other References

Jung Hye Lee, International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/042514, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Nov. 27, 2009. cited by applicant .
Jung Hye Lee, Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/042514, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Nov. 27, 2009. cited by applicant .
Pessier, R. and Damschen, M., "Hybrid Bits Offer Distinct Advantages in Selected Roller Cone and PDC Bit Applications," IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Feb. 2-4, 2010, New Orleans. cited by applicant .
Sung Joon Lee, International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/050672, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Mar. 3, 2010. cited by applicant .
Sung Joon Lee, Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/050672, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Mar. 3, 2010. cited by applicant .
S.H. Kim, International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/067969, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated May 25, 2010. cited by applicant .
S.H. Kim, Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/067969, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated May 25, 2010. cited by applicant .
Beijer, G., International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/042514, The International Bureau of WIPO, dated Nov. 2, 2010. cited by applicant .
Adri Schouten, International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/083532, European Patent Office, dated Feb. 25, 2009. cited by applicant .
Adri Schouten, Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/083532, European Patent Office, dated Feb. 25, 2009. cited by applicant .
Sheppard, N. and Dolly, B. "Rock Drilling--Hybrid Bit Success for Syndax3 Pins." Industrial Diamond Review, Jun. 1993, pp. 309-311. cited by applicant .
Tomlinson, P. and Clark, I. "Rock Drilling--Syndax3 Pins--New Concepts in PCD Drilling." Industrial Diamond Review, Mar. 1992, pp. 109-114. cited by applicant .
Williams, J. and Thompson, A. "An Analysis of the Performance of PDC Hybrid Drill Bits." SPE/IADC 16117, SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Mar. 1987, pp. 585-594. cited by applicant .
Warren, T. and Sinor L. "PDC Bits: What's Needed to Meet Tomorrow's Challenge." SPE 27978, University of Tulsa Centennial Petroleum Engineering Symposium, Aug. 1994, pp. 207-214. cited by applicant .
Smith Services. "Hole Opener--Model 6980 Hole Opener." [retrieved from the Internet on May 7, 2008 using <URL: http://www.siismithservices.com/b.sub.--products/product.sub.--page.asp?I- D=589>]. cited by applicant .
Mills Machine Company, Inc. "Rotary Hole Openers--Section 8." [retrieved from the Internet on Apr. 27, 2009 using <URL: http://www.millsmachine.com/pages/home.sub.--page/mills.sub.--catalog/cat- .sub.--holeopen/cat.sub.--holeopen.pdf>]. cited by applicant .
Georgescu, M., International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051019, dated Jun. 6, 2011, European Patent Office. cited by applicant .
Georgescu, M., Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051019, dated Jun. 6, 2011, European Patent Office. cited by applicant .
Georgescu, M., International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051020, dated Jun. 1, 2011, European Patent Office. cited by applicant .
Georgescu, M., Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051020, dated Jun. 1, 2011, European Patent Office. cited by applicant .
Georgescu, M., International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051017, dated Jun. 8, 2011, European Patent Office. cited by applicant .
Georgescu, M., Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051017, dated Jun. 8, 2011, European Patent Office. cited by applicant .
Georgescu, M., International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051014, dated Jun. 9, 2011, European Patent Office. cited by applicant .
Georgescu, M., Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051014, dated Jun. 9, 2011, European Patent Office. cited by applicant .
Georgescu, M., International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/050631, dated Jun. 10, 2011, European Patent Office. cited by applicant .
Georgescu, M., Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/050631, dated Jun. 10, 2011, European Patent Office. cited by applicant .
Becamel, P., International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jan. 5, 2012, The International Bureau of WIPO, Switzerland. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Omgba; Essama
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sutton McAughan Deaver PLLC

Parent Case Text



CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a divisional application of, and claims priority benefit of, U.S. application Ser. No. 12/114,537, filed May 2, 2008 and entitled "MODULAR HYBRID DRILL BIT", now abandoned, which is incorporated herein by specific reference.
Claims



We claim:

1. A method of assembling a hybrid drill bit, the method including the steps of: providing a bit body having at least one fixed blade having a plurality of fixed cutting elements mounted thereon, and at least one slot, the blade and slot extending in the axial direction; assembling a bit leg within the slot using one or more bolts, with each bolt passing through each of one or more oblong holes through the leg, the leg having a rolling cutter rotatably mounted thereon, the collar rolling cutter having a plurality of rolling cutter cutting elements mounted thereon; adjusting the projection of the rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade; and thereafter tightening the bolt.

2. The method as set forth in claim 1, further including the step of assembling the bit leg within the slot using two bolts, with each bolt through each of two axially oblong holes through the leg.

3. The method as set forth in claim 2, wherein the step of adjusting the projection of the rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade comprises sliding the leg in the axial direction relative to the two bolts.

4. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of thereafter tightening the bolt includes tightening the bolt to fix the projection of the rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade.

5. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the projection of the rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade is fixed after the step of thereafter tightening the bolt.

6. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the projection of the rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade is fixed during manufacturing.

7. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the projection of the rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade is fixed before being employed.

8. A method of assembling a hybrid drill bit, the method including the steps of: providing a bit body having a plurality of fixed blades, each blade having a plurality of fixed cutting elements mounted thereon, and plurality of slots, each slot including a plurality of circular threaded holes extending radially into the body, the blade and slot extending in the axial direction; assembling a bit leg within each slot using a plurality of bolts through axially oblong holes in the leg and the circular threaded holes in the body, the leg having a rolling cutter rotatably mounted thereon, the rolling cutter having a plurality of rolling cutter cutting elements mounted thereon; adjusting the projection of the rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade; and thereafter tightening the bolts.

9. The method as set forth in claim 8, wherein the step of adjusting the projection of the rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade comprises sliding the leg in the axial direction relative to the bolts.

10. The method as set forth in claim 8, wherein the step of thereafter tightening the bolt includes tightening the bolt to fix the projection of the rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade.

11. The method as set forth in claim 8, wherein the projection of the rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade is fixed after the step of thereafter tightening the bolt.

12. The method as set forth in claim 8, wherein the projection of the rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade is fixed during manufacturing.

13. The method as set forth in claim 8, wherein the projection of the rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade is fixed before being employed.

14. A method of assembling a hybrid drill bit, the method including the steps of: providing a bit body having at least one fixed blade having a plurality of fixed cutting elements mounted thereon, and at least two slots, the blade and slots extending in the axial direction; assembling a first bit leg within a first one of the slots using at least a first bolt, the first leg having a first rolling cutter rotatably mounted thereon, the first rolling cutter having a plurality of rolling cutter cutting elements mounted thereon; assembling a second bit leg within a second one of the slots using at least a second bolt, the second leg having a second roller cutter rotatably mounted thereon, the second roller cutter having a plurality of rolling cutter cutting elements mounted thereon; adjusting a projection of each rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade; and thereafter tightening the bolt, wherein tightening the bolt fixes the projection of each rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade, with the projection of the first rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade being independent of the projection of the second rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade.
Description



BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Technical Field

The present invention relates in general to earth-boring drill bits and, in particular, to a bit having a combination of rolling and fixed cutters and cutting elements and a method of drilling with same.

2. Description of the Related Art

The success of rotary drilling enabled the discovery of deep oil and gas reservoirs and production of enormous quantities of oil. The rotary rock bit was an important invention that made the success of rotary drilling possible. Only soft earthen formations could be penetrated commercially with the earlier drag bit and cable tool, but the two-cone rock bit, invented by Howard R. Hughes, U.S. Pat. No. 930,759, drilled the caprock at the Spindletop field, near Beaumont, Tex. with relative ease. That venerable invention, within the first decade of the last century, could drill a scant fraction of the depth and speed of the modern rotary rock bit. The original Hughes bit drilled for hours, the modern bit drills for days. Modern bits sometimes drill for thousands of feet instead of merely a few feet. Many advances have contributed to the impressive improvements in rotary rock bits.

In drilling boreholes in earthen formations using rolling-cone or rolling-cutter bits, rock bits having one, two, or three rolling cutters rotatably mounted thereon are employed. The bit is secured to the lower end of a drillstring that is rotated from the surface or by a downhole motor or turbine. The cutters mounted on the bit roll and slide upon the bottom of the borehole as the drillstring is rotated, thereby engaging and disintegrating the formation material to be removed. The rolling cutters are provided with cutting elements or teeth that are forced to penetrate and gouge the bottom of the borehole by weight from the drillstring. The cuttings from the bottom and sides of the borehole are washed away by drilling fluid that is pumped down from the surface through the hollow, rotating drillstring, and are carried in suspension in the drilling fluid to the surface.

Rolling-cutter bits dominated petroleum drilling for the greater part of the 20.sup.th century. With improvements in synthetic or manmade diamond technology that occurred in the 1970s and 1980s, the fixed-cutter, or "drag" bit, became popular again in the latter part of the 20.sup.th century. Modern fixed-cutter bits are often referred to as "diamond" or "PDC" (polycrystalline diamond compact) bits and are far removed from the original fixed-cutter bits of the 19.sup.th and early 20.sup.th centuries. Diamond or PDC bits carry cutting elements comprising polycrystalline diamond compact layers or "tables" formed on and bonded to a supporting substrate, conventionally of cemented tungsten carbide, the cutting elements being arranged in selected locations on blades or other structures on the bit body with the diamond tables facing generally in the direction of bit rotation. Diamond bits have an advantage over rolling-cutter bits in that they generally have no moving parts. The drilling mechanics and dynamics of diamond bits are different from those of rolling-cutter bits precisely because they have no moving parts. During drilling operation, diamond bits are used in a manner similar to that for rolling cutter bits, the diamond bits also being rotated against a formation being drilled under applied weight on bit to remove formation material. Engagement between the diamond cutting elements and the borehole bottom and sides shears or scrapes material from the formation, instead of using a crushing action as is employed by rolling-cutter bits. Rolling-cutter and diamond bits each have particular applications for which they are more suitable than the other; neither type of bit is likely to completely supplant the other in the foreseeable future.

In the prior art, some earth-boring bits use a combination of one or more rolling cutters and one or more fixed blades. Some of these combination-type drill bits are referred to as hybrid bits. Previous designs of hybrid bits, such as is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,343,371 to Baker, III, have provided for the rolling cutters to do most of the formation cutting, especially in the center of the hole or bit. Other types of combination bits are known as "core bits," such as U.S. Pat. No. 4,006,788 to Garner. Core bits typically have truncated rolling cutters that do not extend to the center of the bit and are designed to remove a core sample of formation by drilling down, but around, a solid cylinder of the formation to be removed from the borehole generally intact.

Rolling-cutter bits tend to fail when the bearing or seal fails and one or more cutters stop rotating or rotating easily. Bearing failure is most often caused by loss of lubricant from the bit or damage to the bearing as a result of severe operating conditions. In some cases, the bearing failure is so catastrophic that a cutter falls off of the bearing, which can lead to costly and time-consuming fishing operations to recover the lost cutter. Typically, rolling-cutter bits cannot successfully be refurbished because of irreparable bearing damage. Diamond bits rarely have such a catastrophic failure. Instead, individual diamond cutters tend to be lost and the bit body is slowly worn away such that it is no longer within drilling specifications. Diamond bits can be refurbished by replacing lost cutters until the bit body is too worn.

Another type of hybrid bit is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,695,019 to Shamburger, Jr., wherein the rolling cutters extend almost entirely to the center. Fixed cutter inserts 50 (FIGS. 2 and 3) are located in the dome area 2 or "crotch" of the bit to complete the removal of the drilled formation. Still another type of hybrid bit is sometimes referred to as a "hole opener," an example of which is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,527,066. A hole opener has a fixed threaded protuberance that extends axially beyond the rolling cutters for the attachment of a pilot bit that can be a rolling cutter or fixed cutter bit. In these latter two cases the center is cut with fixed cutter elements but the fixed cutter elements do not form a continuous, uninterrupted cutting profile from the center to the perimeter of the bit.

Although each of these bits is workable for certain limited applications, an improved hybrid earth-boring bit with enhanced drilling performance would be desirable.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is a general object of the present invention to provide an improved earth-boring bit of the hybrid variety. This and other objects are achieved by providing an earth-boring bit comprising a bit body configured at its upper end for connection into a drillstring. At least one fixed blade depends axially downwardly from the bit body. An axially extending slot is formed in the bit body adjacent the fixed blade. A bit leg is received and retained in the slot by engagement between the slot and correspondingly shaped bit leg. At least one rolling cutter is secured to the bit leg at its lower extent.

According to an illustrative embodiment of the invention, at least one fastener secures the bit leg against movement relative to the bit body and the fastener extends through oblong apertures in the bit leg and into the bit body, wherein the bit leg can be moved axially relative to the bit body to adjust the projection of the rolling cutter relative to the fixed blade.

According to an illustrative embodiment of the invention, the slot is formed by at least three sides, and at least one acute angle is formed by two adjacent sides. The slot defines a pair of generally opposed sides connected by a third side, the generally opposed sides being inclined toward one another to define a dovetail that corresponds with the shape of the bit leg.

According to an illustrative embodiment of the invention, the bit body further comprises a shank that is configured for connection into the drillstring at its upper extent and has a generally cylindrical receptacle formed in its lower extent; and a bit body portion having a generally cylindrical upper extent, the receptacle being and dimensioned to receive the upper extent of the bit body, wherein the shank and bit body portions are secured together by welding.

According to an illustrative embodiment of the invention, the earth-boring bit further comprises a nozzle removably secured in the bit body, the nozzle receptacle configured to receive a nozzle; a bearing formed integrally with the bit leg, the rolling cutter mounted for rotation on the bearing; and a lubricant compensator removably secured in the bit leg, the lubricant compensator in fluid communication with the bearing.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

So that the manner in which the features and advantages of the present invention, which will become apparent, are attained and can be understood in more detail, more particular description of embodiments of the invention as briefly summarized above may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof that are illustrated in the appended drawings which form a part of this specification. It is to be noted, however, that the drawings illustrate only some embodiments of the invention and therefore are not to be considered limiting of its scope as the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.

FIG. 1 is a bottom plan view of the embodiment of the hybrid earth-boring bit constructed in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a side elevation view of an embodiment of the hybrid earth-boring bit of FIG. 1 constructed in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 3 is an exploded view of another embodiment of the hybrid earth-boring bit of FIG. 2 constructed in accordance with the present invention; and

FIG. 4 is a sectional view of a portion of the earth-boring bit of FIG. 3, illustrating the configuration of the axial slot in accordance with the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to FIGS. 1-2, an illustrative embodiment of a modular hybrid earth-boring drill bit is disclosed. The bit 11 comprises a bit body 13 having an axis 15 that defines an axial center of the bit body 13. A plurality (e.g., two shown) of bit legs or heads 17 extend from the bit body 13 in the axial direction. The bit body 13 also has a plurality (e.g., also two shown) of fixed blades 19 that extend in the axial direction. The number of each of legs 17 and fixed blades 19 is at least one but may be more than two (as in the case of the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3). In one embodiment, the centers of the legs 17 and fixed blades 19 are symmetrically spaced apart from each other about the axis 15 in an alternating configuration.

Rolling cutters 21 are mounted to respective ones of the bit legs 17. Each of the rolling cutters 21 is shaped and located such that every surface of the rolling cutters 21 is radially spaced apart from the axial center 15 (FIG. 2) by a minimal radial distance 23. A plurality of rolling-cutter cutting inserts or elements 25 are mounted to the rolling cutters 21 and radially spaced apart from the axial center 15 by a minimal radial distance 27. The minimal radial distances 23, 27 may vary according to the application, and may vary from cutter to cutter, and/or cutting element to cutting element.

In addition, a plurality of fixed cutting elements 31 are mounted to the fixed blades 19. At least one of the fixed cutting elements 31 is located at the axial center 15 of the bit body 13 and adapted to cut a formation at the axial center. In one embodiment, the at least one of the fixed cutting elements 31 is within approximately 0.040 inches of the axial center. Examples of rolling-cutter cutting elements 25 and fixed cutting elements 31 include tungsten carbide inserts, cutters made of super-hard material such as polycrystalline diamond, and others known to those skilled in the art.

FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate the modular aspect of the bit constructed according to the present invention. FIG. 3 is an exploded view of the various parts of the bit 111 disassembled. The illustrative embodiment of FIG. 3 is a three-cutter, three-blade bit. The modular construction principles of the present invention are equally applicable to the two-cutter, two-blade bit 11 of FIGS. 1 and 2, and hybrid bits with any combination of fixed blades and rolling cutters.

As illustrated, bit 111 comprises a shank portion or section 113, which is threaded or otherwise configured at its upper extent for connection into a drillstring. At the lower extent of shank portion 113, a generally cylindrical receptacle 115 is formed. Receptacle 115 receives a correspondingly shaped and dimensioned cylindrical portion 117 at the upper extent of a bit body portion 119. Shank 113 and body 119 portions are joined together by inserting the cylindrical portion 117 at the upper extent of body portion 119 into the cylindrical receptacle 115 in the lower extent of shank 113. For the 121/4 inch bit shown, the receptacle is a Class 2 female thread that engages with a mating male thread at the upper extent of the body. The circular seam or joint is then continuously bead welded to secure the two portions or sections together. Receptacle 115 and upper extent 117 need not be cylindrical, but could be other shapes that mate together, or could be a sliding or running fit relying on the weld for strength. Alternatively, the joint could be strengthened by a close interference fit between upper extent 119 and receptacle 115. Tack welding around the seam could also be used.

A bit leg or head 121 (three are shown for the three-cutter embodiment of FIG. 3) is received in an axially extending slot 123 (again, there is a slot 123 for each leg or head 121). As shown in greater detail in FIG. 4, slot 123 is dovetailed (and leg 121 correspondingly shaped) so that only axial sliding of leg 121 is permitted and leg 121 resists radial removal from slot 123. A plurality (four) of bolts 127 and washers secure each leg 121 in slot 123 so that leg 121 is secured against axial motion in and removal from slot 123. A rolling cutter 125 is secured on a bearing associated with each leg 121 by a ball lock and seal assembly 129. The apertures in leg 121 through which bolts 127 extend are oblong, which permits the axial positioning of leg 121 within slot 123, which in turn permits selection of the relative projection of the cutting elements on each rolling cutter. A lubricant compensator assembly 131 is also carried in each leg 121 and supplies lubricant to the bearing assembly and compensates for pressure variations in the lubricant during drilling operations. A preferred compensator is disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 4,727,942 to Galle and Zahradnik. At least one nozzle 133 is received and retained in the bit body portion 119 to direct a stream of drilling fluid from the interior of bit 111 to selected locations proximate the cutters and blades of the bit.

FIG. 4 is a sectional section view of bit body 119 illustrating the configuration of slot 123. As previously noted, slot 123 has a pair of adjacent opposing sides 135 that are inclined toward one another at an acute included angle (from vertical) to define a dovetail. A third side, which may be curved or flat, connects the two opposing sides 135. A rectilinear 137 recess is formed within the third side for additional engagement between the bit leg and bit body. As stated, bit leg 121 is provided with a corresponding shape so that once assembled together, bit leg 121 resists removal from slot 123 except by axial force. Preferably, for the 121/4 inch bit illustrated, slot 123 is approximately 3.880 inches wide at its widest point, opposing sides 135 are inclined at an angle of approximately 15 degrees and converge to define an included angle of approximately 30 degrees. Recess 137 is approximately 1.880 inches wide and approximately 0.385 inches deep. The corresponding surfaces of bit leg 121 are similarly dimensioned, but between 0.005 and 0.010 inch smaller to provide a sliding or running fit within the slot. A close interference fit could also be used to enhance strength, at the cost of ease of assembly. A blind threaded hole or aperture 139 is formed in bit body 119 to receive each of the fasteners or bolts 127 (FIG. 3). Alternatively, the opposed sides 135 of slot 123 could be "straight," but such a construction will not be as strong as the "dovetailed" construction and may unduly strain bolts 127.

Thus, in accordance with the present invention, the threaded shank is separable from the bit body and each bit leg and associated rolling cutter is also separable from the bit body (along with the associated lubricant compensator, bearing and seal assembly). Thus, as the bit wears, various parts may be replaced as appropriate. If the bearing associated with a cutter loses lubricant and fails, the entire bit leg assembly can be replaced as needed. If the bit body wears to the degree that it will no longer support fixed cutters (or other parts of the bit assembly), it can be replaced. If the shank is damaged, it can be replaced. Although the welded joint is not typically considered a replaceable joint, in this instance, the weld can be removed, a new shank or body portion fitted, and there will be ample material remaining to permit re-welding of the two together.

While the invention has been shown or described in only some of its forms, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that it is not so limited, but is susceptible to various changes without departing from the scope of the invention as hereinafter claimed, and legal equivalents thereof.

* * * * *

References


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed