U.S. patent number 3,927,719 [Application Number 05/572,496] was granted by the patent office on 1975-12-23 for remote sealing of mine passages.
This patent grant is currently assigned to The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the. Invention is credited to Kenneth R. Maser.
United States Patent |
3,927,719 |
Maser |
December 23, 1975 |
Remote sealing of mine passages
Abstract
Mine passages are sealed remotely from the surface by drilling a
borehole from the surface to intersect a mine passage. Fly ash is
then pneumatically injected down the borehole in dilute phase at
high velocity to form a partial seal obstructing more than 90% but
less than 99% of the area of the mine passage. The emplaced fly ash
displays the form of a conical pile with the flanking slopes
curving concavely upward to the lips of a crater formed beneath the
injection borehole. Sealing is then completed by injection of an
expanding foam into the crater area.
Inventors: |
Maser; Kenneth R. (Lexington,
MA) |
Assignee: |
The United States of America as
represented by the Secretary of the (Washington, DC)
|
Family
ID: |
24288076 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/572,496 |
Filed: |
April 25, 1975 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
169/46; 166/292;
299/12; 169/64; 405/267 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E21F
15/08 (20130101); E21F 17/103 (20130101); E21B
33/05 (20130101); E21B 33/138 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
E21F
15/08 (20060101); E21F 17/00 (20060101); E21B
33/138 (20060101); E21B 33/03 (20060101); E21F
15/00 (20060101); E21F 17/103 (20060101); E21B
33/05 (20060101); A62C 001/00 (); A62C 003/02 ();
E21F 015/08 (); E21B 033/13 () |
Field of
Search: |
;169/43-46,48,49,54,64
;299/12,11 ;166/292,295 ;61/35 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Blunk; Evon C.
Assistant Examiner: Kashnikow; Andres
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Shubert; Roland H. Fraser; Donald
R.
Claims
I claim:
1. A method for remotely constructing a seal in a mine passage
which comprises:
drilling a borehole from the surface to intersect the mine
passage,
pneumatically injecting dry fly ash in dilute phase down said
borehole to form a partial plug of fly ash within said mine
passage, said plug obstructing more than 90% but less than 99% of
the area of said passage and having a crater-like depression below
said borehole, and
thereafter injecting an expanding foam into said crater-like
depression to fill the depression and to complete the seal.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the flow rate of gas used to
pneumatically inject said fly ash is selected according to the
following approximate formula
wherein G represents gas flow rate in scfm and W represents the
width of the mine passage in feet.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein said mine passage comprises a coal
mine passage.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein said seal is constructed to
isolate a fire burning within said mine from the remainder of the
mine workings and wherein the gas used to pneumatically inject fly
ash does not support combustion.
5. The method of claim 4 where said expanding foam is a
two-component froth foam which is mixed at the bottom of the
borehole and injected directly into the crater-like depression
within the fly ash plug.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein said expanding foam is a
polyurethane foam.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Dry fly ash has been pneumatically injected through boreholes
drilled from the surface into mine workings to isolate fires in
abandoned coal mine workings and to stabilize the land surface by
preventing subsidence. A typical delivery system utilizes a
conventional bulk pneumatic truck to pump the fly ash down the
borehole through a short length of surface casing set in the
borehole to provide a seal and a connection to the delivery hose of
the pneumatic track. Such a technique is disclosed in the Magnuson
patent, U.S. Pat. No. 3,500,934. Fly ash injection is usually
continued to refusal; that point at which no more fly ash can be
injected down the borehole at the maximum pressure developed by the
truck.
It has been proposed, and attempts have been made, to utilize this
same technique to isolate a fire breaking out in an operating coal
mine. The conventional way to combat a well-developed mine fire in
underground workings is to seal all surface openings and maintain
the seal until the fire dies from lack of oxygen and the fire area
has cooled sufficiently as to preclude re-ignition upon exposure to
air. Depending upon the intensity and extent of the fire, sealing
must be maintained for a minimum period of 6 months to several
years before the mine can be re-opened. During the time the mine is
sealed, methane builds up in the mine atmosphere, often to
explosive levels, and the physical condition of the mine
deteriorates with roof falls being common. Both the buildup of
methane in the mine atmosphere and the physical deterioration of
the mine add to the hazards on re-opening the mine.
While good seals have been made in abandoned mine workings by the
conventional pneumatic injection of dry fly ash down boreholes, the
technique encounters a number of disadvantages when applied to
fires within active mines. First, large quantities of fly ash are
required. Fly ash is readily available from coal-fired power plants
but the quantity of fly ash available over a short time span is
limited by the rate of fly ash production and the storage capacity
of the power plants. Second, premature plugging without sealing of
the mine passage often occurs when there is a large amount of
rubble in the passage beneath the injection borehole. Third, the
technique is unsatisfactory in deep workings. When fly ash is
pneumatically injected in conventional fashion down a deep
borehole, friction tends to reduce the velocity at the bottom of
the borehole sufficiently that plugging of the borehole occurs
before sealing is accomplished.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
I have discovered that passages within an operating mine may be
remotely sealed from the surface much more rapidly, using
substantially smaller quantities of fly ash, and at greater depths
than is possible using conventional techniques of pneumatic fly ash
injection. My process is especially useful in isolating a fire area
within a coal mine so that the fire may be brought under control
and the mine re-opened much more quickly than is possible by use of
traditional methods.
In my process, boreholes are drilled from the surface to intersect
mine passages at the periphery of the fire zone. Fly ash is
delivered to the borehole by pneumatic tank trucks and the fly ash
is pneumatically injected down the borehole in dilute phase at high
velocity. Fly ash injection is continued until there is formed a
conical pile of fly ash which seals or blocks more than 90% but
less than 99% of the area of the passage. The conical fly ash pile
exhibits flanking slopes curving concavely upward with a well
developed crater below the injection borehole. Fly ash injection is
then halted and the seal is completed by injecting an expanding
foam, such as urethane foam, into the crater area. Quantity of fly
ash used and time required to construct seals in this manner are
reduced to one half or even less of that required in the
conventional technique of continuing fly ash injection to refusal.
In addition, my technique increases the probabilities of obtaining
a perfect seal especially in those passages having an uneven roof
configuration.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a partial sectional view showing a preferred arrangement
for injection of dry fly ash into a mine passage in dilute phase at
high velocity.
FIG. 2 illustrates a system for introducing an expanding foam into
the crater area of the injected fly ash so as to complete the seal
of the mine passage.
FIG. 3 present graphically the differences in fly ash usage and
time required to achieve a 95% seal as compared to a 100% seal as a
function of passage height and width.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
When fly ash is pneumatically injected through boreholes into mine
workings, it is generally transported to the mine site in a
pneumatic truck and is discharged in the fluidized state using the
air supply integral with the bulk hauler. A typical discharge rate
from these trucks is approximately 1 ton of fly ash per minute at
an air flow rate of 300 to 350 cfm resulting in a solids loading of
about 50 pounds of fly ash per pound of air. The system works well
when injection is into open passages under relatively shallow
overburden. At these air-fly ash ratios, there occurs what may be
considered a dense phase flow of fluidized fly ash which mixture is
sensitive to choking and plugging in long lines. This is especially
true when injection is attempted through boreholes into relatively
deep mine workings; on the order of 500 to 1500 feet in depth.
Friction in this length of borehole is sufficient to so slow the
flow of the suspended fly ash that it is deposited in a cone
beneath the borehole and plugs the borehole before the mine passage
is completely filled.
At low solids loadings with high gas flow rates, the fly ash is
distributed in a different manner. The gas jet, issuing into the
mine passage from the borehole, produces a large crater under the
hole and pushes the fly ash to the sides of the passage so that the
corners are sealed first. Thus the seal progresses from the outer
edges inwardly and finally produces a seal having a broad area from
the lip of the crater to the flanking slope of the deposited fly
ash. Rubble piles beneath the borehole, often caused by the bit
breaking through the roof of the mine passage when the borehole is
drilled, strongly interfere with the formation of a fly ash seal
when fly ash is pneumatically injected in a relatively dense phase.
This often leads to plugging of the borehole before a passage seal
is achieved. With a high gas flow and dilute phase injection, the
crater tends to spread beyond the extent of the rubble so that
interference on the sealing operation by the rubble is small.
In order to obtain the dilute phase injection of fly ash and high
velocities necessary for effective sealing of mine passages, the
gas flow rate is selected according to the following general
formula:
where G represents gas flow rate in standard cubic feet per minute
and W represents width of the mine passage in feet. This is an
approximate formula which has proven to be satisfactory over a wide
range of passage widths. However, the calculated gas flow rate
obtained by use of this formula should be increased by 10 to 20%
for a passage having an unusually low height to width ratio, less
than about 1:3 and for a four-way intersection.
Bulk pneumatic haulers are usually equipped with an integral air
supply consisting of a blower or compressor having sufficient
capacity to pressurize, fluidize and pneumatically transport the
material carried by the truck. The capacity of such integral
blowers is far less than that required to pneumatically inject fly
ash by my method but the capacity of the truck blower is included
in the gas flow rate needed as derived from the formula previously
set out. Referring now to FIG. 1, there is shown a partial
sectional representation of the fly ash injection stage of my
process. A borehole 1 is drilled from the surface through
overburden 2 to intersect a mine passage 3. Borehole 1 must be
cased if it passes through aquifers in the overburden since any
significant waterflow into and down the borehole tends to cause
plugging when dry fly ash is injected.
Fly ash is delivered to the site in conventional bulk pneumatic
trucks (not shown) which are connected to entry lines 4 of ejector
assembly 5. While a single entry line may be used, it is preferred
to provide dual entry lines arranged in a Y-type connection as
shown in the drawing to allow alternate or simultaneous fly ash
injection from two trucks. The entry lines are equipped with
standard couplings allowing connection to the delivery hose carried
by the pneumatic trucks. Ejector assembly 5 may be an eductor
arrangement into which is introduced a supplementary gas stream 6
supplied by blower or compressor 7. Blower 7 must have sufficient
capacity to deliver gas at the flow rate required to satisfy the
formula set out previously. In practical terms, this requires a
blower capable of supplying about 3000 to 6000 SCF per minute at
pressures ranging up to about 10 psi. Intake 8 of blower 7 is
connected to a source of inert gas when injection is made in
proximity to the fire zone within a mine. Inert gas used may
comprise nitrogen or gas produced by a standard inert gas
generator. Small amounts of oxygen, below that concentration which
will support combustion, are allowable in the injected gas
stream.
Gas supplied by blower 7 mixes with the relatively dense phase fly
ash stream delivered by the pneumatic truck to form a dilute phase
suspension of fly ash. This dilute suspension is then injected by
way of conduit 9 down borehole 1. In those cases where the borehole
penetrates aquifers, resulting in a water flow down the hole, the
borehole must be cased and conduit 9 may be coupled directly to the
casing. Fly ash in dilute suspension flows down the borehole at
high velocity and is distributed first to the sides of the mine
passage. Sealing progress from the outer edges of the deposited fly
ash inwardly toward the borehole with the formation and maintenance
of a large crater 10, under the hole. Flanking slopes 11 of the fly
ash deposited in the mine passage develop in a concave upward
configuration with the maximum slope at the crater rim. Test
observations indicated that slope of the deposited fly ash depended
upon differential settling of fly ash particles and not upon the
natural angle of repose. Natural cohesiveness of the fly ash
permitted angles of up to 70.degree. to form on the inside slopes
12 of the crater but these steep slopes would eventually topple.
Maximum stable slope obtainable was between 16.degree. and
20.degree. compared to the natural angle of repose of fly ash which
is ordinarily in the range of about 8.degree. to 12.degree..
Fly ash injection is continued until more than 90%, and preferably
more than 95% of the area of the mine passage is blocked. It is not
possible to determine this point by surface monitoring of injection
conditions such as back pressure. However, the required amount of
fly ash necessary to produce a fly ash plug blocking some 95% or
more of the mine passage may be calculated provided that the
dimensions of the mine passage is known. This may be accomplished
by application of the following formula: ##EQU1## where: h =
passage height
w = passage width
.theta. = slope angle of fly ash pile
Values for .theta. depend to some extent upon the fly ash employed
but a value of 15.degree. can normally be used. In this formula, a
truck load is that of a standard bulk pneumatic tanker which can
carry some 20-22 tons of fly ash. Alternatively, the degree of
blockage of the mine passage may be continuously monitored by an
acoustic method and device disclosed and claimed in copending,
commonly assigned patent application, Ser. No. 504,468.
After fly ash injection has proceeded to a point where more than
90% of the passage area has been blocked, injection is stopped.
Thereafter, the seal is completed by injection of an expanding
foam, such as polyurethane, into the crater below the borehole.
Foam injection may be accomplished in accordance with the procedure
and apparatus depicted in FIG. 2. Referring now to that Figure,
there is shown a system whereby a two component foam is mixed
downhole directly above the crater area. The two components of the
foam system, 20 and 21, are held in containers under pressure on
the surface. These components, when mixed, form what is commonly
referred to as a froth foam as opposed to a pourable foam. Each
component contains a gas, such as a fluorocarbon, dissolved in it
under pressure. Each foam component is maintained under an
additional applied pressure of an inert gas such as nitrogen
supplied from source 22, through pressure regulating valve 23 and
branch lines 24 and 25. The two foam components are delivered
downhole through conduits 26 and 27 which preferably comprise
flexible hoses of about 3/4 inch diameter. Flow of each component
is monitored by meters 28 and 29 and controlled by regulating
valves 30 and 31.
The downhole component mixing system consists of a mixing head or
chamber 32 into which component lines 26 and 27 discharge through
variable pressure relief valves 33 and 34. Valves 33 and 34
maintain a back pressure on the component lines sufficient to
prevent foaming of the components within the lines. Back pressure
applied by valves 33 and 34 is controlled by air line 35 which is
connected to a relatively high pressure air supply 36 through
pressure regulating valve 37. Mounted below mixing head 32 is
mixing means 38 which preferably comprises a static mixer, such as
those manufactured by Kenics or Koch, wherein mixing of the two
components occurs along with considerable foaming. A 3-foot long,
1-inch diameter mixer is a size generally appropriate. Connected to
the bottom of mixer 38 is a short length of pipe 39 to which is
attached a quick disconnect coupling 40 which may be activated by
air pressure supplied by line 41. Below coupling 40 is attached a
second short length of pipe 42 having mounted thereon packers 43
and 44 which prevent foam from flowing back up the borehole. The
end of the second pipe 42 extends into the crater area in the
injected fly ash plug and may be provided with a flat plate
disperser 45 which provides a final mixing and directs foam flow
horizontally.
Since the foam sets up quickly, it is highly desirable and usually
necessary, to provide the system with a stop-restart capability. To
achieve this, relief valves 33 and 34 are pressurized sufficiently
to stop flow of the foam components. Thereafter, a solvent such as
methylene chloride from storage means 46 is used to flush the
mixing assembly. Solvent is pumped, via means 47 and conduit 48, to
mixing head 32 whereby foam is flushed from the mixing assembly
before it has time to set. Foam injection can thereafter be
restarted be decreasing the air pressure on relief valves 33 and
34. After foam injection has been completed, quick disconnect
coupling 40 is activated by means of air pressure applied through
line 41. The mixer assembly is then retrieved from the hole leaving
tail pipe 42 and packers 43 and 44 in place at the bottom of the
hole.
This preferred system of foam injection requires a total of five
hoses to be deployed down the hole; two hoses for the separate foam
components, one small airline for the pressure regulating relief
valves, one small airline to activate the quick disconnect coupling
and one small line for the solvent. The hoses carrying the foam
components are preferably about 3/4 inch in diameter which 1/4 inch
lines are satisfactory for the other three. In operation, it is
preferred to attach the mixing system assembly to a cable and winch
assembly (not shown) and attach the five hoses to the cable as the
assembly is lowered into the hole. Attachment of the hoses to the
cable may be simply accomplished by wrapping the hose-cable bundle
with tape, such as duct tape, at intervals of several feet. On
retrieval of the system, the hoses may be cut free of the winch
cable and wound as a bundle onto a reel.
FIG. 3 depicts graphically the relationship between the amount of
fly ash needed, and time required to inject it, as a function of
passage height and width for a 95% and 100% seal. As can readily be
appreciated from the Figure, nearly twice as much fly ash is needed
and nearly double the time is required to create a 100% seal in a
mine passage as is required to create a 95% seal.
The time required to complete a seal by foam injection after a 95%
seal has been created by pneumatic implacement of fly ash naturally
is somewhat dependent upon borehole depth as this affects the
deployment time of the mixing assembly down the hole. However,
deployment of the mixing assembly can ordinarily be accomplished in
less than an hour in boreholes ranging in depth to 1000 feet or
more. Amount of foam required and the corresponding time necessary
to generate it is relatively insensitive to passage size over that
range of sizes normally found in coal mines. There are two primary
reasons for this. First, fly ash fills more than 90%, and
preferably about 95% of the passage so that the final open volume
requiring foam topping is relatively small. The second factor which
makes the required quantity of foam virtually independent of
passageway geometry is the random flow pattern of the material in
which the foam flows into open areas of the partial fly ash seal
following generally paths of least resistence. Regardless of
borehole location relative to the passageway, the general geometry
of the fly ash pile or the initial flow direction of the foam, the
first three or four flow channels or foam formed produce a 100%
seal. Foaming time required for total sealing in no case exceeded
one-half hour for a seal of at least 10 feet thick. Longer foaming
times merely increases the thickness of the seal. In all cases,
foam implacement was accomplished using the method described in
FIG. 2 at a foam rate of 40 to 45 pounds per minute to produce a
foam having a density on the order of 2-21/2 pounds per cubic
foot.
Organic foams used in the process are of course flammable. Charring
of the foam seal on the hot, or fire side, of the seal can be
expected to occur. However, actual combustion of the foam will not
occur because of the oxygen-depleted atmosphere within the fire
zone. The bulk of the emplaced foam is thermally protected by fly
ash thus adding to the heat resistence of the emplaced foam. In
addition, the foam seal is typically a minimum of 10 feet thick and
is a very effective insulating material thus inhibiting the
propogation of charring through the seal.
The following examples serve to more fully illustrate specific
embodiments of my invention.
EXAMPLE 1
A full scale test of the process was carried out in a straight mine
passage which was accessable from both sides. The passage had a
width of approximately 20 feet and the roof height varied from 9 to
11 feet with a dome about 13 feet high near the injection borehole.
Three boreholes on nominal 30 foot centers were drilled through
about 450 feet of overburden to intersect the mine passage. These
boreholes were cased and the center hole was used as the injection
borehole while the flanking holes accommodated the acoustic seal
checker described in patent application Ser. No. 504,468.
Apparatus similar to that described in relation to FIG. 1 was used
to inject fly ash down the center borehole. In addition to the air
provided by the compressor of the bulk pneumatic truck there was
supplied additional air by a blower (element 7 of FIG. 1) at the
rate of 3000 scfm. An elliptical crater, whose long axis spanned
the width of the passage, was formed during the early stages of
sealing. The crater continued to exist throughout the sealing
process and resulted in filling of the passage from the outward
corners in toward the center. This kept the borehole clear of fly
ash and insured filling the corners of the passage.
After injection of 14 truck loads, or approximately 280 tons of fly
ash, 96% of the area of the passage was blocked as indicated by the
acoustic seal checker and confirmed by physical examination. Time
for actual injection of fly ash to create a 95% seal was 7 hours
with a total elapsed time of about 14 hours. To increase the seal
to 98% required 80 more tons of fly ash and 4 additional hours. To
further increase the seal to 99% required an additional 80 tons of
fly ash and another 4 hours of delivery time.
During the fly ash injection with a blower rate of 3000 scfm, the
blower pressure was in the range of 5 to 6 psi and the borehole
pressure fluctuated in the range of 0-1 psi. Fluctuations in
pressure were due primarily to variations in the fly ash flow rate
as delivered by the trucks. Surface instrumentation failed to
provide any indication of the fly ash build up in the mine
passage.
At the conclusion of the fly ash injection, there existed a large
crater beneath the borehole extending almost to the walls. Both
rib-roof corners were nearly completely sealed with fly ash. A
clearance of about 4 inches between the fly ash and the roof
existed on one side of the seal while the clearance on the other
side varied from about 18-24 inches.
Foam injection apparatus as described in relation to FIG. 2 was
lowered down the injection borehole to a point where the disperser
plate extended about 11/2 feet below the mine roof. Foaming was
then started using a polyurethane foam. The isocyanate portion of
the formulation was a TDI prepolymer prepared with a
pentaerythritol-based polyol. The polyol portion of the formulation
was a blend of pentaerythritol-based polyol and an .alpha.-methyl
glucoside-based polyol. Each component had about 10% of Freon 12
and Freon 22 blended into them. A foaming rate of about 42 pounds
per minute was maintained with a 10% isocyanate-rich foam
mixture.
Foam first filled the large crater which required about 650 pounds
of foam and approximately 15 minutes of foaming time. At this
point, the seal checker indicated a complete seal and underground
visual observations confirmed the checker reading. Foaming was then
continued for another 65 minutes to observe the behavior of the
foaming operation. Foam next started to channel down the low side
of the fly ash pile and later the foam finally broke out on the
high side of the fly ash pile and ran down the flanking slopes. The
seal checker continued to indicate a 100% seal during the second
phase of the foaming operation.
EXAMPLE 2
A fire occurred in a bituminous coal mine working the Pittsburgh
seam. The fire could not be controlled so the mine was evacuated
and sealed. Thereafter, exploratory drilling from the surface
showed that the fire area encompassed some 4 acres of mine
workings.
It was determined from the data obtained in the exploratory
drilling and from available mine maps that the fire area could be
isolated by the construction of six seals. Thereafter, boreholes
were drilled from the surface to intersect the mine workings at the
seal points. Overburden thickness varied from somewhat over 400
feet minimum to 610 feet maximum. Three boreholes were drilled at
each seal site on a nominal 30 foot spacing and the boreholes were
cased to full depth. The center hole was used as the injection
borehole while the two outside holes accommodated the acoustic seal
checker described in patent application Ser. No. 504,468 and were
later used to monitor the mine atmosphere on both sides of the
emplaced seal.
Fly ash was then pneumatically injected in dilute phase into each
of the seal sites using sufficient nitrogen in the injection gas so
as to provide at all times a "safe" atmosphere; one sufficiently
low in oxygen content as to not support combustion. Fly ash
injection was halted at three of the seal sites at that point where
the acoustic seal checker indicated that greater than 95% of the
area of the mine passage had been blocked by fly ash. A minimum of
6 and a maximum of 8 truckloads of fly ash were used in each of
these three seal sites. At the remaining seal sites, fly ash
injection was continued until a complete seal had been obtained. A
complete seal was considered to be that point at which the acoustic
seal checker indicated complete blockage of the mine passage area
followed by the injection of one additional truckload of fly ash.
Two of these seals required 12 truckloads of fly ash each while the
third seal required 26 truckloads. However, this last seal was at a
4-way intersection which accounts in large part for the difference
in fly ash required. In all cases, a truckload of fly ash refers to
that amount carried by a standard bulk pneumatic trailer, or about
20-22 tons. In no case did refusal occur; refusal being that point
at which no additional fly ash can be injected into the hole.
The three seal sites at which fly ash injection was halted at a
point where more than 95% of the passage area was blocked were then
completed by injecting urethane foam in the manner described in
reference to FIG. 2. Foaming rate was approximately 40 pounds per
minute. The first seal required 2,324 pounds of foam; the second
required 1000 pounds while the third seal required 2256 pounds.
After all six seals were completed, the mine atmosphere within and
without the seal area was carefully monitored to determine whether
the fire area had been successfully isolated. Successful isolation
was indicated by a change in the composition of the atmosphere
between the two areas and a stabilization of the carbon monoxide
and oxygen levels outside the fire area.
After isolation of the fire area had been established, the mine was
opened and ventilated while maintaining close monitoring of the
atmosphere within the fire zone. Inspection teams then entered the
mine to physically examine the seals. Five of the seals proved to
be accessable while one seal, that one completed with 2324 pounds
of foam, could not be reached. However, monitoring indicated there
to be no gas leakage across the seal. Four of the five seals
examined were good.
One seal, that one completed using 2,256 pounds of foam, was found
to have open communication in an area encompassing approximately 4
square feet between the fire zone and the rest of the mine. An
investigation of the seal area revealed three factors were
responsible for the incomplete seal. First, the injection borehole
penetrated the mine passage at a loading point. Normal height of
the mine passages was approximately 6 feet, the thickness of the
coal seam, but at the loading point the roof had been raised an
additional 4 feet. This created an irregular indentation or dome in
the roof at the seal area. Second, the injection borehole
penetrated the mine passage immediately adjacent the rib at one
side of the borehole. Third, the borehole used for the transmitter
of the acoustic seal checker had drifted some 15 feet toward the
injection borehole. This resulted in the transmitter being buried,
or partially buried, by fly ash during the injection process and
caused inaccurate readings as to the completeness of the seal. The
open area was against the rib opposite the injection borehole.
However, the seal was complete enough to preclude any significant
circulation between the fire area and the rest of the mine and the
void area was easily plugged by the inspection team.
* * * * *