U.S. patent number 3,927,410 [Application Number 05/465,632] was granted by the patent office on 1975-12-16 for ink jet nozzle.
This patent grant is currently assigned to International Business Machines Corporation. Invention is credited to Walter T. Pimbley.
United States Patent |
3,927,410 |
Pimbley |
December 16, 1975 |
Ink jet nozzle
Abstract
An ink jet nozzle comprises a unitary construction of a nozzle
plate having a jewel orifice on one face with a passage through the
plate at right angles thereto for supplying ink to the nozzle under
pressure, a reaction mass and a piezoelectric ceramic connecting
the nozzle plate and the reaction mass. The assembly is secured to
a support by a silicone rubber isolation damper which permits the
nozzle plate, piezoelectric ceramic, and the reaction mass to
vibrate as a unit at a selected frequency to effect uniform break
off of ink drops from the ink stream issuing from the nozzle.
Inventors: |
Pimbley; Walter T. (Vestal,
NY) |
Assignee: |
International Business Machines
Corporation (Armonk, NY)
|
Family
ID: |
23848544 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/465,632 |
Filed: |
April 30, 1974 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
347/47; 310/334;
347/75; 310/321; 310/345 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B41J
2/025 (20130101); B41J 2002/14362 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B41J
2/015 (20060101); B41J 2/025 (20060101); G01D
015/18 () |
Field of
Search: |
;346/75,140
;310/8.2,9.1,9.4 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Other References
Denny et al.; Diaphragm Ink Drop Generator And Liquid Horn; IBM
Tech. Disc. Bulletin; Vol. 16, No. 3, August 1973, pp. 789-791.
.
Newell, W. E.; Face-Mounted Piezoelectric Resonators; Proceedings
of the IEEE, June 1965, pp. 575-581..
|
Primary Examiner: Hartary; Joseph W.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Giolma; Francis V.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. In an ink jet printer apparatus,
a support member,
a substantially flat ink jet nozzle structure disposed for
connection to a source of ink,
a reaction mass,
damping means resiliently connecting said reaction mass to said
support member, and
transducer means operating in a thickness mode connecting said
nozzle structure to said reaction mass for producing resonant
periodic bodily vibration of said nozzle and reaction mass
independently of said support member to produce periodic drops of
ink from said nozzle.
2. The invention as defined in claim 1 characterized by said ink
jet nozzle structure comprising a plate having a nozzle opening on
one surface and an opening through said plate at right angles to
said nozzle opening for supplying ink thereto under pressure.
3. The invention as defined in claim 2 characterized by said
transducer means comprising a piezoelectric crystal plate
sandwiched between said nozzle plate and one surface of said
reaction mass.
4. The invention as defined in claim 3 characterized by said nozzle
plate, piezoelectric crystal, and reaction mass being cemented to
each other in a sandwich arrangement by layers of epoxy resin with
wire spacers included in said layers to maintain a predetermined
uniform thickness of said layers.
5. The invention as defined in claim 3 characterized by said
damping means comprising a body of silicone rubber secured to said
support member and to and partially surrounding said reaction mass
on two opposite sides and the intervening surface away from the
surface secured to said piezoelectric crystal.
6. The invention as defined in claim 3 characterized by the
relative thicknesses of the nozzle plate, piezoelectric crystal,
and reaction mass being related by the formula Cos k.sub.1 L.sub.1
[Sin k.sub.2 L.sub.2 Cos k.sub.3 L.sub.3 + H.sub.3 Cos k.sub.2
L.sub.2 Sin k.sub.3 L.sub.3 ] + H.sub.1 Sin k.sub.1 L.sub.1 [Cos
k.sub.2 L.sub.2 Cos k.sub.3 L.sub.3 -H.sub.3 Sin k.sub.2 L.sub.2
Sin k.sub.3 L.sub.3 ]= 0 where L.sub.1 L.sub.2 and L.sub.3 are the
thicknesses of the nozzle plate, piezoelectric crystal and reaction
mass, respectively; H.sub.1 and H.sub.3 are the acoustic impedance
mismatches between the nozzle plate and piezoelectric crystal, and
the piezoelectric crystal and reaction mass respectively; and
k.sub.1 k.sub.2 and k.sub.3 = equal .omega./v.sub.1 .omega./v.sub.2
and .omega./v.sub.3, where v.sub.1, v.sub.2 and v.sub.3 are the
velocities of the waves in the media of the nozzle plate,
piezoelectric crystal and reaction mass, respectively.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to ink jet printers and it has
reference in particular to an ink jet nozzle structure and a method
of making it.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Ink jet nozzles are known such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,334,351
which issued on Aug. 1, 1967 to N. L. Stauffer, showing
schematically a right angle nozzle with a magnetostrictive
transducer driving element for producing vibration of the
nozzle.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,596,275 which issued on July 27, 1971 to R. G.
Sweet also discloses schematically a similar right angle nozzle
structure.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Generally stated it is an object of this invention to provide an
improved ink jet nozzle.
More specifically it is an object of the invention to provide an
ink jet nozzle which is most efficient and effective within a
predetermined frequency range.
It is an object of the invention to provide an ink jet nozzle which
has improved ink drop forming characteristics.
It is also an object of the invention to provide an ink jet nozzle
in which a resonant perturbation condition is attained, so as to
enhance the formation of uniform ink drops from an ink stream.
Yet another object of the invention is to provide a sandwich type
nozzle structure wherein a piezoelectric ceramic for producing
perturbations in an ink stream is secured between a nozzle plate
and a reaction mass to vibrate as a unit at a selected
frequency.
It is also an object of the invention to provide for defining the
relative proportions of a nozzle plate, a piezoelectric ceramic and
a reaction mass in an ink jet nozzle structure for the most
efficient operation thereof.
Still another object of the invention is to provide for securing a
nozzle plate, piezoelectric ceramic, and a reaction mass together
by cementing them together with a predetermined wire spacer in the
cement between the parts to insure consistently accurate relative
positioning of the elements.
Yet another important object of the invention is to provide for
securing a unitary structure of a reaction mass, a piezoelectric
ceramic, and a nozzle plate, to support means by means of a
silicone rubber composition which provides a damped connection,
permitting the unitary structure to float and vibrate as a unit,
independently of the mass of the support means.
A further object of this invention is to provide for determining
the relative proportions of a multielement nozzle structure for
operation in a predetermined frequency range.
A still further important object of the invention is to provide an
integrated ink jet nozzle structure wherein the perturbance
velocity amplitude is proportional to the current of the exciting
signal.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the
invention will be more apparent from the following more particular
description of a preferred embodiment of the invention as
illustrated in the accompanying drawing.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is an isometric view of an ink jet nozzle structure
embodying the invention.
FIG. 2 is a partial cross-sectional view of the nozzle plate and
ceramic of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is an isometric view of the nozzle plate piezoelectric
ceramic and reaction mass.
FIG. 4 is an enlarged partial cross-sectional view of the assembly
in FIG. 3 showing how the elements are cemented together.
FIG. 5 is a schematic showing of the equivalent electric circuit of
the assembly shown in FIG. 3.
FIG. 6 is a curve showing the relationship between the admittance
and the frequency of oscillation for the nozzle structure of the
invention.
FIG. 7 is a curve showing the relationship between the phase and
frequency for the equivalent circuit and the actual nozzle
structure of the invention.
FIG. 8 is a curve showing the relationship between break off time
versus voltage at 60 KHz.
FIG. 9 is a curve showing the relationship between break off time
and voltage at 100 KHz.
FIG. 10 is a curve showing the reciprocal of the break off time
versus the wave length for 60 KHz.
FIG. 11 is a curve showing the reciprocal of the break off time
versus wave length for 100 KHz.
FIG. 12 is a curve showing the relationship between the velocity
perturbation per volt versus the frequency.
FIG. 13 is a curve showing the relationship between the velocity
perturbation per volt versus the admittance.
DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to FIG. 1 the reference numeral 10 denotes generally an
ink jet nozzle structure comprising a rectangular nozzle plate 12
cemented to a piezoelectric ceramic 14, which is in turn cemented
to a reaction mass 16. The nozzle plate 12 comprises a generally
rectangular plate of stainless steel having a passage 18 entering
from one side by means of a nipple 20 to which a flexible hose may
be fastened for supplying ink to the passage 18 under pressure.
Pressures in the range of 30 to 60 pounds may be used. The plate is
provided with an opening 22 at the center connecting with the
passage 18, and over which a jewel nozzle 24 may be secured in any
suitable manner such as by cementing, the nozzle having a central
orifice 26 which is perpendicular to the passage 18 and through
which a stream of ink may be projected under pressure. The passage
18 may have a diameter on the order of 0.030 inches by way of
example.
The nozzel plate 12 is secured to one face of a piezoelectric
ceramic 14, the other face of which is secured to a reaction mass
16 which may comprise a generally rectangular block of stainless
steel for example. The reaction mass is secured to a generally
U-shaped support 30 having a central bight portion 32 with
upstanding spaced apart legs 34, and 36 having projecting tabs 38
and 40 at the ends to which flat springs 42 and 44 may be connected
by means of screws 46 and 48 for fastening the assembly to lugs 50
and 52 on the frame of the printer and permitting movement for
aiming. An arm 54 projecting from the central portion of the bight
32 may be used with suitable adjusting means (not shown) for aiming
the nozzle 24 and directing the ink stream.
As shown in FIG. 4 the nozzle plate 12 and the reaction mass 16 may
be cemented to the piezoelectric ceramic 14 by means of layers of
cement 15 and 16 comprising for example an epoxy cement. In order
to provide the best bond between the nozzel plate, the reaction
mass and the ceramic, it is essential that the layers of cement 15
and 16 be accurately defined. For this purpose Molybdenum wire
spacers, 0.003 inches in diameter identified by the numeral 19 may
be imbedded in the epoxy. The sandwiched structure is then cured
while being held in a springloaded jig, the wires 19 maintaining
perfect spacing between the elements.
The reaction mass 16 is secured to the support 30 by means of
silicone rubber 56 having a durometer value of 65 for example, on
the Shaw scale, and which is bonded to the bight and to the two
legs of the support 30, as well as to the reaction mass 16. The
thickness of the rubber 56 is not critical and any value from a few
mils to about 1/4 inch may be used. This permits the assembly of
the nozzle plate 12 ceramic 14 and reaction mass 16 to float and
vibrate independently of the mass of the support 30. Connectors 58
and 60 may be connected to the reaction mass 16 and the nozzle
plate 16 for applying a voltage therebetween to effect vibration of
the piezoelectric ceramic thus causing the nozzle plate and the
nozzle to vibrate longitudinally relative to the ink stream thus
imposing the velocity perturbation thereon.
The frequency of response of an ink jet head can be obtained
approximately by considering the response of three semi-infinite
slabs adjacent to one another such as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. Media
I and III represent the nozzle plate 12 and the reaction mass 16,
respectively and Medium II represents the piezoelectric ceramic 14.
Thickness mode vibrations of the ceramic slab 14 cause longitudinal
standing waves to be set up in all three media in the x directions
shown.
The controlling wave equation for this physical problem is ##EQU1##
omitting any damping effects. E is Young's modulus for a media and
.rho. is its density.
The solution of equation 1, giving the standing waves, is:
Medium I
u.sub.1 = Cos .omega.t [C.sub.1 Cos k.sub.1 x.sub.1 + C.sub.2 Sin
k.sub.1 x.sub.1 ]
Medium II
u.sub.2 = Cos .omega.t [C.sub.3 Cos k.sub.2 x.sub.2 + C.sub.4 Sin
k.sub.2 x.sub.2 ]
Medium III
u.sub.3 = Cos .omega.t [C.sub.5 Cos k.sub.3 x.sub.3 + C.sub.6 Sin
k.sub.3 x.sub.3 ] (2)
where: ##EQU2## and v.sub.1, v.sub.2 and v.sub.3, the velocities of
the waves in the media are given by: ##EQU3##
There are six unknown constants in equation 2; C.sub.1 through
C.sub.6. These constants will be determined by boundary conditions.
At the boundaries A and D in FIG. 3 the force transmitted per unit
area equals zero. At boundaries B and C, u, the displacement is
continuous. Also at boundaries B and C, the force per unit area
which is transmitted is discontinuous; the discontinuity at the two
boundaries being equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. This
discontinuity is given by:
Pressure discontinuity = .rho. Cos .omega.t (5)
and is the driving force per unit area given by the piezoelectric
action.
The six boundary conditions yield six equations which determine the
six unknown constants in equations 2 uniquely. These six equations
also yield the resonance condition of the structure. That resonance
condition is:
Cos k.sub.1 L.sub.1 [Sin k.sub.2 L.sub.2 Cos k.sub.3 L.sub.3 +
H.sub.3 Cos k.sub.2 L.sub.2 Sin k.sub.3 L.sub.3 ] + H.sub.1 Sin
k.sub.1 L.sub.1 [Cos k.sub.2 L.sub.2 Cos k.sub.3 L.sub.3 -H.sub.3
Sin k.sub.2 L.sub.2 Sin k.sub.3 L.sub.3 ]= 0 (6)
H.sub.1 and H.sub.3 are the acoustic impedance mismatches between
media I and II and II and III respectively. They are given by:
##EQU4## where A.sub.1, A.sub.2 and A.sub.3 are the areas of the
three media.
The parameters that match the head shown in FIG. 4 are:
L.sub.1 = 0.090 inch, L.sub.2 = 0.250 inch, L.sub.3 = 0.250 inch,
v.sub.1 =v.sub.3 =1.97 . 10.sup.5 inches sec. v.sub.2 = 1.06 .
10.sup.5 inches/sec.
The first four resonant frequencies, as computed from equation (6),
are:
f.sub.1 = 101.6 KHz
f.sub.2 = 238.4 KHz
f.sub.3 = 365.7 KHz
f.sub.4 = 473.2 KHz (8)
The frequency characteristics of the head shown in FIG. 1 were
measured. FIG. 6 shows the admittance curve for the head while FIG.
7 shows the phase difference versus frequency. In both figures the
points represent experimental data and the solid line is the result
of the fitted equivalent circuit shown in FIG. 5. Of course, the
equivalent circuit would only fit in the given frequency range 30
KHz to 180 KHz. The measured first mechanical resonance is 103.3KHz
and the corresponding parallel resonance point is 120.5KHz.
Break-up of Ink Stream Into Drops.
In order to design properly an ink jet heat, one must be able to
relate the performance of the ink stream breakup properties back to
the initial perturbation imposed on the stream by the head. Lord
Rayleigh first presented an analysis that would provide a
relationship required. However, the initial conditions used by him
are not suitable to the present problem. A variation of the
analysis will therefore be considered.
It is possible to show the variation of the analysis using a one
dimensional model. Assume a stream of liquid initially in the shape
of a cylinder in which the radius, longitudinal velocity of the
stream, and pressure in the liquid are functions of t, time, and Z,
one dimension, only. Further assume that the relative coordinate
system is such that the DC velocity of the stream is zero. The two
differential equations that describe the break-up of the stream
into drops are: ##EQU5## where r is the radius, v is the velocity
of the stream, and P is the pressure in the liquid at any point and
time. .rho. is the density of the liquid. The first of these
equations is an expression of Newton's second law for fluids, and
the second equation is the continuity equation. The pressure in the
liquid is caused by the surface tension, T. Approximately; ##EQU6##
For the initial conditions, set: r = a
v = -v.sub.0 Sin kz (11)
where: ##EQU7## a and v.sub.0 are constants, .lambda. is the wave
length for the imposed perturbation. The solution to the described
problem, when approximations are made to linearize the problem,
is:
v = -v.sub.0 Sin kz . Cosh ut (13) ##EQU8## where: ##EQU9##
These equations show Lord Rayleigh's conclusion. If ak is less than
one, u is real and the radial disturbance grows until drop
break-off occurs. If, however, the wave length of the disturbance
is less than the original circumference of the stream (a . k
greater than one), the hyperbolic functions become circular
functions and an equilibrium condition would occur.
v.sub.0 is the amplitude of the perturbation imposed on the stream
by the ink jet head. However, the break-up properties of the stream
are dependent on all of the other parameters of the analysis as
well. The analysis is used, therefore, to relate the observed
properties of stream break-up to v.sub.0, thus eliminating the
influence of the other parameters.
The break-off time is measured by measuring the break-off distance
and dividing by the velocity of the stream. v.sub.0 can then be
found from equation 14 by assuming that r = 0 at some point at the
break off time. Thus: ##EQU10## where t.sub.B is the break off
time.
Numerous sets of data were taken to show the characteristics of the
ink jet head. FIGS. 8 and 9 show the break-off time as a function
of the logarithm of the voltage amplitude of the impressed signal
at constant frequency and wave length. From the straight line
relationship, one can say: ##EQU11## or:
V = be.sup..sup.-ct.sbsp.b
where V is the voltage amplitude and c and b are constants. A
comparison with equation 16 shows that in the range given the
perturbation, v.sub.0 is directly proportional to the imposed
electric signal. Furthermore, c in equation 17 equals u in equation
16. The ink jet head should always be operated in the linear region
where the perturbation is proportional to the signal for
satisfactory operation.
Sets of data have been taken for the break-up time as a function of
wave length; frequency and head excitation being kept constant. The
wave length was controlled by changing the ink pressure which
caused the stream velocity to change. FIGS. 10 and 11 show two of
the sets of data taken. The points represent the experimental data,
while the solid line is the theoretical curve from equations 13 and
15. The initial perturbation amplitude, v.sub.0, is chosen so as to
provide the best fit.
FIG. 12 is a graph showing the perturbing velocity amplitude per
volt of exciting signal as a function of the frequency. The solid
line is just a smooth curve drawn through the points. FIG. 13 shows
the same dependent variable plotted against the admittance of the
ink jet head, with a straight line being drawn through the data.
The slope of the straight line on this log-log plot is one, showing
a direct proportionality between the current through the head and
the resulting perturbation.
The result that the perturbing velocity amplitude is proportional
to the exciting signal is most important. This proportionality
depends on the relatively short length of the liquid cavity
parallel to the axis of the head. Others have shown that when the
cavity is one quarter wave length long when acting as an open ended
tube, or a half wave length when acting as a closed tube, (wave
length measured in liquid) a resonance that enhances drop break off
occurs. Such a resonance would probably not manifest itself as an
admittance change back at the piezoelectric ceramic.
A commercial, one compound epoxy is used to bond the piezoelectric
sandwich. The curing cycle for the epoxy is heating at 250.degree.F
for 2 hours. While the epoxy is warming up it passes through a
stage where it flows quite freely. Since the epoxy layer should be
from 0.001 to 0.005 inches thick for the best result the Molybdenum
wire spacers 19, 0.003 inches in diameter, are imbedded in the
epoxy to insure uniform thickness since the sandwiches are cured
while being held in spring-loaded jigs.
An ink jet head structure has been disclosed that uses a
piezoelectric sandwich concept with the nozzle in the front plate.
The vibration of the front nozzle plate and the nozzle
longitudinally with the stream causes the stream break-up action.
The head is relatively flat and can be used separately or can be
packaged in densities of up to six heads per inch. Enough room
exists between heads to permit individual aiming of the heads.
For different frequency applications the resonant point may be
shifted by an appropriate choice of longitudinal dimensions. An
equation has been presented, equation 6, so that required
dimensions may be calculated.
A variation of theory has been presented which relates the drop
break-off characteristics with the perturbing velocity amplitude at
the nozzle. Thus the action of the head on the jet can be observed
independently of the action of the jet after it leaves the
nozzle.
The perturbing velocity amplitude has been shown to be directly
proportional to the current amplitude of the exciting signal.
Therefore, with the use of a constant current source, a network in
series with the head to provide constant current or a feedback loop
to control current, the response of the head can be made level.
While the invention has been shown and described with reference to
a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood by those
skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be
made without departing from the spirit and scope of the
invention.
* * * * *