U.S. patent number 3,925,707 [Application Number 05/407,338] was granted by the patent office on 1975-12-09 for high voltage current limiting circuit breaker utilizing a super conductive resistance element.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Invention is credited to Suresh K. Bhate, Robert J. Spreadbury, Michael S. Walker, Frederick J. Young.
United States Patent |
3,925,707 |
Bhate , et al. |
December 9, 1975 |
High voltage current limiting circuit breaker utilizing a super
conductive resistance element
Abstract
A current limiting circuit breaker which is particularly
suitable for use on high voltage direct current systems is
provided. The current limiting circuit breaker utilizes a super
conductive resistance element connected in parallel with a fixed
resistor. During normal circuit operation almost all of the current
flows through the superconductive resistance element. When the
current flowing through the superconductive resistant element
exceeds some known predetermined value the superconductive
resistant element loses its superconducting property and has a
resistance value which is much larger than the fixed resistor. This
forces most of the current through the fixed resistor which limits
maximum current flow. This limited current flow can then be
interrupted by a conventional circuit interrupting device. When
used as a direct current circuit breaker inductance of the fixed
resistor and the superconductive resistor can be chosen to minimize
the current to be interrupted.
Inventors: |
Bhate; Suresh K. (Pittsburgh,
PA), Spreadbury; Robert J. (Murrysville, PA), Walker;
Michael S. (Pittsburgh, PA), Young; Frederick J.
(Edgewood, PA) |
Assignee: |
Westinghouse Electric
Corporation (Pittsburgh, PA)
|
Family
ID: |
23611610 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/407,338 |
Filed: |
October 17, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
361/3; 361/9;
505/850; 361/19 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H02H
9/023 (20130101); H02H 3/025 (20130101); Y02E
40/60 (20130101); Y10S 505/85 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H02H
3/02 (20060101); H02H 9/02 (20060101); H02h
007/22 () |
Field of
Search: |
;317/13D,11C,20,11A |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Trammell; James D.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Elchik; W. A.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A direct current high voltage current limiting circuit breaker
comprising:
a first current path having a first circuit disconnection means in
series with a circuit element, which can be actuated from a
superconductive state to a normal conductive state;
said circuit element when in the normal conductive state having a
first fixed resistance value and a first fixed inductive value;
a second current path in parallel with said first current path
having a second circuit disconnecting means in series with a second
fixed resistance and a second fixed inductance;
an actuator means mechanically connected to said first circuit
disconnecting means and said second circuit disconnecting means to
open said first circuit disconnecting means and said second
disconnecting means together a fixed time after being activated;
and said first fixed resistance value, said second fixed resistance
value, said first fixed inductance value, and said second fixed
inductance value being selected so that a current minimum occurs in
the circuit to be interrupted at the fixed time when said actuator
opens said first circuit disconnecting means and said second
circuit disconnecting means.
2. A direct current high voltage current limiting circuit breaker
as claimed in claim 1 wherein:
the current flow through the circuit breaker after the circuit
element is actuated from a superconductive state to a normal
conductive state is equal to a constant plus a decaying exponential
current plus an increasing exponential current; and,
said actuator means opens the circuit breaker near the point of
minimum current.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to high voltage circuit breakers and more
particularly to a current limiting circuit breaker which utilizes a
superconductive resistance element.
Present breakers are designed to not only open or close the circuit
at the design voltage level; but also to be able to break the
circuit in the event of a short circuit, with the maximum short
circuit current flowing. The circuit breaker must be constructed so
as to withstand the large resulting mechanical forces caused by the
short circuit currents. These large resulting short circuit forces
cause difficulty in the design and operation of the circuit breaker
devices and results in massive mechanical bulk of the high power
structures.
Current limiting devices are especially useful in power
distribution systems for reducing the current to be interrupted
during circuit breaker operation and for limiting any resulting
short circuit fault current. If the short circuit fault current is
not limited, the current may become so intense that the resulting
excessive mechanical forces will damage circuit components. In some
prior art circuit breaker choke coils have been inserted into the
load circuit and alternating current distribution systems to limit
current. These coils however produce a voltage drop and cause
considerable power loss during normal continuous operation of the
system. This causes undesirable inefficiency in the distribution
system. For continuous operation, it is desirable that the current
limiting elements only be inserted in the electrical circuit during
overcurrent conditions when current limiting is required.
Most of the major developments on high voltage circuit interruption
has been on alternating current (AC) circuit breakers where the
cyclic current zero each half cycle provides an opportunity for the
breaker to regain control once it opens. With direct current (DC)
systems no current zero occurs naturally and recourse must be had
to alternate methods for current interruption. One method has been
to use auxiliary circuitry which will transiently reverse the
current through the arc which has been struck between the breaker
contacts when they open. For example, the current can be brought to
zero in an artificial way by discharging a charged capacitor across
the contacts of a DC breaker. For high voltages this method
requires extremely large capacitors which make it unpractical due
to the high cost of the necessary capacitors. Another method is to
suitably shape the length and area of the arc so that the arc
voltage produced will exceed the supply voltage and force the
current down to zero. This approach while suitable for relatively
low circuit voltages is not suitable when it is considered for use
on higher voltage systems. For example, for a DC voltage level in
the range of 100Kv to 1000Kv the required arc length will have to
be in the order of 10 feet to 100 feet. It can be easily
appreciated that the length of the arc required to make the arc
voltage equal to the network voltage makes devices using this
principal very bulky and impractical. In practice, of course,
multiple gap contactors are used with individual gap ratings of
around 30Kv. These multiple contactors are further complicated by
air or gas blast nozzles necessary to disperse the arc built up
when opening under fault conditions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is well known that certain materials when cooled to the region
of less than 20.degree.K exhibit the property of being virtually
resistanceless. For example, a current once initiated in a
superconducting loop will circulate virtually forever without any
driving EMF. Probably not so well known is that the transition from
superconductive to merely low resistance, called normalization, is
very abrupt. This abrupt transition or normalization can be
initiated by exceeding a certain critical current level, by being
exposed to an external magnetic field, by a combination of a given
current and external field, by a shock or by a heat pulse. In some
applications it is very sensitive to the rate of change of
current.
A high voltage current limiting circuit breaker utilizing a
superconductive resistance element is provided. The superconductive
resistance element is connected in series with a circuit
interrupter which is capable of carrying continuous full load
current. The superconductive resistance element is constructed so
that as the load current rises above a predetermined value the
superconductive resistance element will switch from a virtually
zero resistance condition to a high resistance condition, thereby
limiting the current which can flow through the circuit
breaker.
In another embodiment of the invention a parallel path around the
superconductive resistance element and the circuit interrupter is
provided. The additional parallel path contains another circuit
interrupter and a fixed resistance in series. Under normal
operating conditions when the load current is less than the
predetermined current limiting value virtually all of the load
current will flow through the first circuit interrupter and the
superconductive element. If a fault develops in the load circuit as
soon as the load current rises past the predetermined current
limiting value, then the superconductive resistance element will
normalize and switch from approximately zero resistance to a
relatively high resistance. The resistance of the normalized
superconductive resistance element is made much larger than the
resistance of the fixed resistor which is connected in parallel.
The resistance of the fixed resistor exceeds the normalized
resistance of the superconductive element by about 100 times. Thus
approximately 99% of the fault current will be transferred from the
path containing the superconductive element to the path containing
the fixed resistance. The fixed resistance is selected to limit the
fault current to a value less than the breaker's rated current. A
short time after the superconductive resistance element is
normalized and the current is limited, both circuit interrupters
will be opened by a trip circuit. Thus neither curcuit interrupter
will have to interrupt more current than the breaker full load
rating.
If the parallel path containing the fixed resistor is eliminated
then when the superconductive element is normalized current flowing
through the breaker will be limited to a value much less than the
rated load current. Thus, the circuit interrupter will only have to
break a current less than the critical value. Inductance of the
electrical circuit will influence the practicality of using the
superconductive element without a parallel fixed resistance.
In another embodiment the inductance of the superconductive
resistance element and inductance of the fixed resistor are
utilized to further reduce the current to be interrupted.
Inductance of the linear resistor and the superconductor can be
minimized but non-eliminated. In this embodiment of the invention
the breaker parameters are selected to optimize the performance of
the circuit breaker. That is, the instantaneous load current
magnitude when the superconductive resistance element normalizes is
equal to the sum of a constant plus a decaying exponential term
plus an increasing exponential term. Therefore, an instantaneous
current minimum will occur at some finite time after the
superconductive resistant element normalizes. If the parameters of
the circuit breaker are properly selected the instantaneous current
minimum can be made to occur when the breaker interrupter contacts
open. Thus, the circuit interrupter will have to break only a
minimum circuit current. The magnitude and the time of the minimum
instantaneous current can be varied by varying the resistance
parameters of the circuit interrupter. If the time of contact
separation is the same as the time of minimum instantaneous
current, by proper selection of circuit breaker parameters, the
circuit breaker can open at a minimum current point which is
substantially less than steady state value of the circuit
current.
This invention discloses a circuit breaker construction and
assembly which allows the use of a conventional circuit breaker
with a rating sufficient only to be able to carry and interrupt
full load current. The required circuit breaker does not have to be
able to interrupt the potential short circuit current since this is
limited by the superconductive elements. In addition the proposed
device having current limiting properties will allow simplification
and reduction in size of interconnecting links in the power
distribution system, because they will not be required now to
withstand the short circuit capability of the generating
system.
It is an object of this invention to provide a quick response
current activated, current limiting device which does not effect
the load circuit during rated current operation and has
substantially no power loss during normal operation. It is also an
object of this invention to provide a high voltage DC current
limiting circuit breaker which uses only conventional breaker
contacts, rated sufficient to be able to carry full load current
and to break the circuit at full load current.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a current
limiting device which utilizes a superconductive element that is
current sensitive to limit short circuit and overload current to a
safe predetermined value.
It is further object of this invention to provide a circuit breaker
having inductance and resistance parameters selected so that when a
short circuit current is to be interrupted the value of the current
to be interrupted is significantly less than the final steady state
current which could flow through the circuit breaker.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a better understanding of the invention, reference may be had
to the preferred embodiment exemplary of the invention shown in the
accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a circuit breaker having a
superconductive resistance device in series with a circuit
interrupter;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram similar to FIG. 1, with the circuit
breaker having a parallel path including a specific resistance;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram similar to FIG. 2, illustrating
inductance parameters of the circuit breaker;
FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of current versus time for the
circuit schematic shown in FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is a graph similar to FIG. 4 for a different load parameter;
and
FIG. 6 if a graph similar to FIG. 4 for yet another load circuit
parameter.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring now to the drawings, and FIG. 1 in particular, there is
shown a voltage source 10 feeding a load 12 through a circuit
breaker 14. Circuit breaker 14 comprises a circuit switch 16 in
series with a superconductive resistance element 18.
Resistance element 18 is current sensitive and passes from a
superconductive state with virtually zero resistance to a normal
conductive state with a known resistance value after a
predetermined current limit is passed. When element 18 is in a
superconductive state, with virtually zero resistance, breaker 14
carries the entire load current with very little loss.
It is well known that certain materials when cooled to the region
of 0.degree.K to 20.degree.K exhibit the property of being
virtually resistantless. That is, a current once initiated in a
superconducting loop will circulate virtually forever without any
driving electro motive force (EMF). Not so well known is that the
transition called normalization from superconducting to merely low
resistance is very abrupt. This abrupt transition can be initiated
by exceeding a certain critical level. The critical current level
which causes superconducting element 18 to normalize can be
predetermined so that element 18 will normalize at a desired value
and limit the current which can pass through breaker 14. Inductance
in the rest of the circuit influence the practicality of the rapid
introduction of a normalized resistance of element 18 into the
circuit.
Inductance of the circuit may necessitate a parallel circuit as
shown in FIG. 2. A parallel path around interrupter 16 and
superconducting element 18 is provided by a fixed resistive element
20 in series with a switch 22. Under normal operating conditions,
switches 16 and 22 are both closed and element 18 is in the
superconducting state, with a very low resistance. Since the
resistance of element 18 is virtually zero and much less than the
fixed resistance of element 20, virtually no current will flow
through the parallel path comprising switch 22 and fixed linear
resistor 20. Element 18 can be constructed so that as the load
current rises to a predetermined value, 125% of full load current,
then element 18 will change from a superconductive state to a
normal resistance state, with a normal resistance value
approximately 100 times greater than the resistance of fixed
resistor 20.
If a fault develops in the load circuit as the load current passes
the critical predetermined value then superconducting element 18
normalizes and approximately 99% of the fault current will be
transferred from the path containing components 16 and 18 through
the path containing components 20 and 22. The fault current will be
forced to a finite value dependent upon the values of fixed
resistor 20 and the magnitude of the supply voltage 10. The fault
current will be limited to a value less than or equal to the
breakers rated current and interrupting element 16 and 22 will be
opened by a trip circuit a short time later. Circuit switch 22 must
break the load current limited by fixed resistor 20. Circuit switch
16 has only to break, at most, full rated current and never more
than a fraction of full load current when superconductive element
18 normalizes. With a suitable mechanical construction to give some
delay in operating sequence both circuit switches 16 and 22 can be
controlled by a single mechanical activator.
A circuit breaker 14 capable of interrupting 100Kv DC with a full
load capacity of 1000 amps, that is 100 megawatt circuit breakers
can be constructed from readily available material. With 100Kv DC
supply voltage and a full load current of 1000 amps then fixed
resistor 20 must have a value of 100 ohms to limit the fault
current to a value less than or equal to the full load current. The
normalized resistance of element 18 must be approximately 100 times
greater than the resistance of fixed resistor 20 to force
approximately 99% of the current through the path containing fixed
resistor 20. Thus, the normalized resistance of element 18 must be
equal to approximately 10,000 ohms. A suitable element 18 can be
constructed using a single strand of niobium titanium (NbTi) wire
of approximately 27 awg and 10,000 meters long. Other experimental
materials which are suitable for superconductive elements offer
resistance values two orders of magnitude higher. Using these
materials the length of the required wire would necessarily be much
shorter.
The size of the NbTi wire required can be calculated as follows.
Standard NbTi wire would typically have resistance of the order of
10 micro ohm-centimeters. At a current density of 10.sup.6 amps per
square centimeter which represents a fairly reasonable current
density for superconductive elements a wire having a cross
sectional area of ##EQU1## which is approximately equivalent to 27
awg. is required. The length of the wire required equals the
required resistivity of 10,000 ohms multiplied by the cross
sectional area of the wire used which is approximately
10.sup.-.sup.3 sq. centimeters divided by the resistivity of the
wire which is approximately 10 micro ohms centimeter.sup.2 yields a
wire length of 10,000 meters. A length of 10,000 meters using 27
awg wire fault current will be forced to split 99% through elements
20 and 22 and 1% through elements 16 and 18. Since the supply
voltage is fixed at 100Kv DC the current will be forced down to
less than 1000 amps, from some maximum value slightly above 1250
amps, at some rate fixed by the inductance of the circuit.
The amount of refrigerant required can be estimated by assuming a
maximum possible operating time of 100 milliseconds for the main
breaker. Under these conditions something nearer 10 Joules/Meter
will be dissipated in the superconductor element 18 after it goes
normal. This will cause some boiling off of the refrigerant used in
superconductive element 18. The refrigerant used will probably be
liquid helium. Assuming that it will take 100 miliseconds for the
main breaker contacts to open after the superconductive element 18
goes normal than the heat dissipated in the normal superconductor
element 18 can be calculated using the formula I.sup.2 R .times. t
which yields 10.sup.5 Joules. The amount of helium boiled off can
be determined using the following formulas: ##EQU2##
Latent heat of vaporization for helium = 0.021 K Cal/Mole.
Molecular weight of helium = 4; that is, one mole of helium weights
4 grams. Latent heater of vaporization for helium = 5.25 Cal/gm,
which is equivalent to approximately 22 joules per gram.
##EQU3##
It is believed that this combination of a fixed linear resistor 14
paralleling a superconducting resistive element 18 for a current
limiting device is novel. Breaker 14 also has a fail safe
characteristic in that loss of the required refrigerant or an open
circuit in the superconductor element 18 will always initiate an
opening of circuit breaker 14.
It is also possible to utilize the inherent inductance of
superconductive element 18 and fixed resistor 20 to further reduce
the current to be interrupted. Referring now to FIG. 3 there is
shown a circuit breaker 14 in which inductance of element 18 is
indicated by component 24 and inductance of fixed resistor 20 is
indicated by component 26. By the proper choice of circuit
parameters the value of the current to be interrupted can be
lowered substantially. It is believed that the utilization of the
inductive-resistant time constants of the circuit breaker to reduce
the current to be interrupted is novel.
Inductance 24 and 26 of elements 18 and 20 can be minimized but not
eliminated. It is possible to use inductance 24 and 26 to optimize
performance of circuit breaker 14. For example, consider the
following analysis: R.sub.S and L.sub.S are the resistance 18 and
inductance 24 of the superconductor; V.sub.o is the DC voltage
source 10; R.sub.1 is load resistance 12 of the external circuit;
and R and L are the resistance 20 and the inductance 26 of the
fixed resistance path. Thus the full load steady state current is
equal to V.sub.o /R.sub.L and the resistance R.sub.s of
superconductor 18 equals 0. When the resistance of the
superconductive path goes normal, R.sub.s the resistance of element
18 is raised in a step to a value 100 times R, the resistance 20.
Final current in the circuit after the transient has faded away is
##EQU4##
For a transient analysis of circuit breaker 14, the following
calculations are necessary. Equations for the current i through
R.sub.L load resistant 12 and current is through R.sub.s 18 and
L.sub.s 24 are given as: ##EQU5## Take the Laplace transforms of
(1) and (2) with respect to time, noting that i (0.sup.+) = V.sub.o
/R.sub.L and i (o.sup.+) = V.sub.o R.sub.L, to obtain ##EQU6##
equations (3) and (4) are combined to yield the load current I (s)
which is ##EQU7## by the initial and final value theorems of
Laplace transform theory. Equation 5 is multiplied by R.sub.2
divided by V.sub.o and rearranged to yield ##EQU8## The inverse
Laplace transform of (6) is given by ##EQU9## where
As shown by equation (7) instantaneous current through circuit
interrupter 14 is equal to a constant plus a decaying exponential
current plus an increasing exponential current. As shown in FIGS.
4, 5, and 6 the instantaneous current first decreases to the final
steady state value of current. The minimum instantaneous value of
current 40 attained is a function of the circuit parameters R,
R.sub.s, L, and L.sub.s and the load R.sub.1. By varying the
circuit parameters R.sub.L, L.sub.s, L, R.sub.s, and R it is
possible to vary the magnitude of the minimum instantaneous current
40 and time of occurance of minimum instantaneous current 40. Shown
schematically in FIG. 3, switches 16 and 22 are controlled
mechanically by an operator means 30. From FIGS. 4, 5, and 6, and
from equation (7) it is clear that the magnitude and time of a
occurance of the minimum current can be controlled by astute choice
of circuit parameters. If the parameters are properly selected
switches 16 and 22 will open when the current is at a minimum 40.
This system is particularly suitable for limiting the fault current
to be interrupted. Current through switches 16 and 22, during
interruption, can be limited to a value which is considerably less
than the full load trip current. Since the maximum fault current to
be interrupted can be preset the switches 16 and 22 can be
considerably derated over prior art switches.
The values of the parameters selected for FIG. 3, to give the
graphs shown in FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 are:
For the graph in FIG. 4 R.sub.L = 0.01.OMEGA.
For the graph in FIG. 5 R.sub.L = 0.1.OMEGA.
For the graph in FIG. 6 R.sub.L = 0.001.OMEGA.
As can be seen the minimum current 40, in all cases, is
significantly less then the final steady current. Thus it can be
seen that by properly coordinating the opening of switches, 16 and
22, with the occurrence of the minimum current 40, the value of
current to be interrupted can be substantially reduced.
* * * * *