U.S. patent number 3,924,534 [Application Number 05/522,075] was granted by the patent office on 1975-12-09 for lightweight cartridge case of improved aluminum alloy material which eliminates catastrophic failures.
This patent grant is currently assigned to The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army. Invention is credited to Frederick R. Gruner.
United States Patent |
3,924,534 |
Gruner |
December 9, 1975 |
Lightweight cartridge case of improved aluminum alloy material
which eliminates catastrophic failures
Abstract
A high strength aluminum alloy cartridge case wherein said alloy
includes a ispersoid of finely divided aluminum minum oxide
(Al.sub.2 0.sub.3) which coats the aluminum alloy particles to
markedly improve the burnthru resistance of the case, said Al.sub.2
0.sub.3 comprising about 6 to 13% by weight of the cartridge case,
and preferably about 10 to 12% thereof.
Inventors: |
Gruner; Frederick R. (Bel Air,
MD) |
Assignee: |
The United States of America as
represented by the Secretary of the Army (Washington,
DC)
|
Family
ID: |
24079364 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/522,075 |
Filed: |
November 8, 1974 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
102/464; 75/956;
148/440; 428/403; 75/354; 148/439; 419/28; 428/614 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F42B
5/28 (20130101); Y10T 428/2991 (20150115); Y10S
75/956 (20130101); Y10T 428/12486 (20150115) |
Current International
Class: |
F42B
5/00 (20060101); F42B 5/28 (20060101); F42B
005/28 () |
Field of
Search: |
;75/138,.5R,.5BC
;102/43R ;148/32,32.5,11.5A ;428/403 ;29/182.5 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Dean; R.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Edelberg; Nathan Gibson; Robert P.
Suga; Arthur M.
Government Interests
The invention described herein may be manufactured, used and
licensed by or for the Government for governmental purposes without
the payment to me of any royalty thereon.
Claims
I claim:
1. A lightweight cartridge case of a high strength aluminum alloy,
said alloy including Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 dispersoid in an aluminum
alloy matrix uniformly distributed throughout said alloy matrix
resulting in a substantially continuous network of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3
throughout said alloy.
2. The cartridge case as described in claim 1 wherein said Al.sub.2
O.sub.3 is present therein in proportions ranging between about 6
to 13% by weight.
3. The cartridge case as described in claim 2 further characterized
by said Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 being present in proportions ranging
between about 10 to 12% by weight.
Description
This invention relates to ammunition and more particularly concerns
an improved aluminum alloy cartridge case having excellent burnthru
resistance.
Presently in the United States and in many foreign countries, brass
is widely used for cartridge cases for military small arms
ammunition. This metal, however, contains about 70% copper, a
material which is now strategic, and especially so in times of war.
The United States obtains over 1/2 of its copper needs from foreign
sources, principally Chile and the Congo, a logistically dangerous
situation.
Steel cartridge cases, whose cost approximates that of brass
cartridge cases have been used as a substitute therefor in certain
applications. The use of steel substantially overcomes the problem
of the use of strategic copper, but does not lessen the weight of
the cartridge case which aluminum does so well with the attendant
advantages of increased firepower for a given weight of ammunition
carried by an Infantryman. Further, the complex heat treatments
required by steel do not lend themselves to high production
processes, so vital in times of war. Also steel cartridge cases
cause excessive wear on gun components.
When a brass or steel cartridge case fails during firing, no gun
malfunction occurs. There may be a small flow of propellant gases
at low velocity thru the failure, i.e., a crack or split in the
case sidewall, but no catastrophic failure will occur. A
castastrophic failure may be defined as a high velocity flow of
high temperature propellant gases passing thru the crack or split
and carrying particles and melted globules of aluminum therewith.
The melted aluminum particles or globules react exothermally with
the propellant gases producing a large plume of flame in the exit
gases which result in permanent or serious malfunction of the
weapon and/or injury to the operator.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a high
strength aluminum alloy for small arms cartridge cases having
excellent burnthru resistance.
Another object of the invention is to provide such a small arms
cartridge case having about 1/3 the weight of a corresponding
conventional brass case.
Still another object of the invention is to provide such a
lightweight case which utilizes none or only a minor proportion of
strategic copper.
A still further object of the invention is to provide such a
cartridge case which will not undergo any catastrophic failure.
These and other objects of the invention will become apparent from
the following description.
Briefly, I have discovered that conventional high strength aluminum
alloys can be rendered resistant to burnthru by providing an
Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 coating around each aluminum alloy particle and/or
an Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 dispersoid throughout the aluminum alloy
matrix.
More specifically, I have discovered that about 6 to 13% by weight
of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 when incorporated into high strength aluminum
alloys and thus resulting in a material which by subsequent
compacting and/or sintering, hot and cold working will yield a
lightweight high strength product admirably suited for small arms
cartridge cases.
My Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 dispersoid does not react with the aluminum
alloy matrix and possesses a much higher melting point
(2015.degree.C) than aluminum (660.2.degree.C). The dispersoid
increases the high temperature strength of the cartridge case. For
example, the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 dispersion-strengthened pure aluminum
has a tensile strength of approximately 14,000 psi at 500.degree.C
and maintains this strength at this temperature for a period
exceeding 700 hours, as compared to 3000 psi for the standard high
strength aluminum alloys, measured after the same number of hours
at the same temperature. My dispersoid may comprise from about 6 to
13% by weight of the final alloy composition, 10 to 12% being
preferred. Proportions of my dispersoid up to about 15% however may
be effective in preventing burnthru. Below about 6% of the oxide,
effective burnthru resistance could not readily be provided to the
case material, whereas above about 15% of the oxide, a product
insufficiently ductile resulted.
In the actual production of my powder for use in my lightweight
aluminum cartridge case, any of the high strength aluminum alloy
powders, such for example, as the 2000, 6000, or 7000 series, when
processed to obtain proper coating of the alloy particles with
Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 and dispersion of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 throughout the
matrix, have been found suitable and satisfactory for the purpose
of this invention.
A method for obtaining this coating of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 and its
dispersion may readily be obtained by ball milling the aluminum
alloy powders until the desired Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 content is
achieved. The ball milling continuously exposes new aluminum alloy
surfaces which immediately oxidize in the ball mill with a coating
of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3. In order to reduce ball milling time, the
aluminum alloy powder may be pre-oxidized by conventional methods
well known in the art, such as anodic chemical processes wherein
the powder becomes the anode in an electrolytic bath of chromic,
sulphuric or oxalic acid. The preferred amount of aluminum oxide,
by weight, is 10 to 12 percent of the weight of the cartridge
case.
In the actual preparation of my powdered metal aluminum alloy sheet
used in the fabrication of my lightweight cartridge cases, the
process steps are:
1. The aluminum alloy powder of about 1 to 20 microns in diameter
contains an oxide or hydrate film of about 0.01 micron thickness
around each particle. This powder is ball milled using strainless
steel balls (or corundum balls if freedom from iron is required).
Ball milling is continued until the desired Al.sub.2 O.sub.3
content is obtained. The extent of powder grinding is based on the
desired oxide content, which is proportional to the generated
surface area. The preferred oxide content for my applications is
about 10 to 12 weight %. A lubricant such as isopropyl alcohol
should be used in the grinding operation. The resulting powder
should then be vacuum dried at about 300.degree.F to complete
alcohol removal.
2. The dried powder is then cold pressed isostatically and sintered
at approximately 540.degree.C in any suitable neutral atmosphere,
such as argon, to produce a billet.
3. The billet is then hot-pressed at about 700.degree.F at about
90,000 psi into a rod.
4. The rod may next be hot extruded at a reduction ratio in a range
of about 10 to 1, to 30 to 1, into a rod of smaller diameter or
configuration to partially break down the oxide coating and provide
aluminum alloy to aluminum alloy bonding of the particles to
increase the mechanical strength of the alloy and to also provide
very uniform dispersion of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3.
5. The extruded rod is now hot and cold rolled to obtain the
desired thickness of sheet for subsequent production processes of
conventional stamping, heat treating, and drawing operations.
In the following Examples, the above described process steps were
followed, the extrusion reduction ratio being about 25 to 1, the
values being obtained at room temperature:
EXAMPLE I
7075 aluminum alloy atomized powder having an average particle size
of about 1 to 10 microns diameter, was ball milled with stainless
steel balls until 11% by weight of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 resulted:
Tensile Strength : 70,000 psi (min.) Yield Strength : 60,000 psi
(min.) Elongation in 2" : At least 10%
EXAMPLE II
6061 aluminum alloy atomized powder having an average particle size
of about 1 to 10 microns diameter, was ball milled with stainless
steel balls, until about 10% by weight of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was
obtained:
Tensile Strength : 43,000 psi Yield Strength : 38,000 psi
Elongation in 2" : At least 10%
EXAMPLE III
Same Conditions as in EXAMPLE II, except 2024 aluminum alloy
atomized powder used in lieu of 6061:
Tensile Strength : 60,000 psi Yield Strength : 45,000 psi
Elongation in 2" : At least 15%
Upon metallographic examination of each Al.sub.2 O.sub.3
dispersion-strengthened aluminum alloy, a continuous web-like
netting of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was observed to permeate the entire
alloy which is believed to impart the desirable high temperature
properties to the standard high strength aluminum alloys making it
readily usable for applications exceeding 200.degree.C and
providing the excellent burnthru resistance needed for cartridge
case applications.
Test samples of my improved aluminum alloys which comprise about 10
to 12% by weight Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 and containing a predrilled hole
of 0.0135" diameter to simulate a failed cartridge case were
experimentally fired in a firing chamber in which actual small arms
cartridge propellants generated temperatures and pressures
approximating those actually obtained in small arms firing
chambers. Absolutely no evidence of burnthru occured up to a
pressure of 46,300 psi. Spectrographic readings of the plume showed
no AlO present which would be an indication of the rapid oxidation
or burning of aluminum in the propellant gas stream. When similar
experiments were repeated with standard 6061T6 aluminum alloy,
severe erosion of the hole in the test sample occured with a
resulting plume of flame which would cause a catastrophic failure
if this alloy were used in small arms cartridge cases.
Summarizing, it is apparent from the foregoing description that I
have provided an aluminum alloy cartridge case which is
strengthened by a dispersoid of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, which not only
increases the high temperature properties of the resulting alloy
but provides excellent burnthru resistance to the case to eliminate
catastrophic failures thereof.
* * * * *