U.S. patent number 3,923,669 [Application Number 05/519,728] was granted by the patent office on 1975-12-02 for antiwear hydraulic oil.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Sun Oil Company of Pennsylvania. Invention is credited to Thomas D. Newingham, Alexander D. Recchuite.
United States Patent |
3,923,669 |
Newingham , et al. |
December 2, 1975 |
Antiwear hydraulic oil
Abstract
An improved antiwear hydraulic oil comprises major amounts of a
mineral lubricating oil (preferably a hydrocracked oil which has
been solvent extracted to improve ultra-violet light stability) and
minor amounts of a "secondary" zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate
antiwear agent, chelating type and film forming type metal
deactivators, a neutral barium salt of a petroleum sulfonate and a
succinic acid based rust inhibitor. The hydraulic oil is especially
useful in lubrication of high output (e.g., 100 gallons per minute)
bronze-on-steel axial piston pumps.
Inventors: |
Newingham; Thomas D. (West
Chester, PA), Recchuite; Alexander D. (Boothwyn, PA) |
Assignee: |
Sun Oil Company of Pennsylvania
(Philadelphia, PA)
|
Family
ID: |
24069530 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/519,728 |
Filed: |
October 31, 1974 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
508/273; 508/306;
508/374; 252/75 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C10M
135/10 (20130101); C10M 133/22 (20130101); C10M
129/42 (20130101); C10M 141/10 (20130101); C10M
133/44 (20130101); C10M 137/10 (20130101); C10N
2010/04 (20130101); C10M 2215/22 (20130101); C10M
2207/026 (20130101); C10M 2207/123 (20130101); C10M
2219/068 (20130101); C10M 2229/05 (20130101); C10M
2215/221 (20130101); C10M 2207/22 (20130101); C10M
2223/045 (20130101); C10M 2219/044 (20130101); C10M
2219/106 (20130101); C10M 2219/102 (20130101); C10M
2215/225 (20130101); C10M 2207/129 (20130101); C10M
2215/06 (20130101); C10M 2215/14 (20130101); C10M
2215/226 (20130101); C10M 2215/30 (20130101); C10M
2219/10 (20130101); C10M 2215/223 (20130101); C10M
2219/104 (20130101); C10M 2229/02 (20130101); C10M
2215/064 (20130101); C10M 2207/127 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
C10M
141/00 (20060101); C10M 141/10 (20060101); C10M
001/48 (); C10M 003/42 (); C10M 005/24 (); C10M
007/46 () |
Field of
Search: |
;252/32.7E,33,75 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Gantz; Delbert E.
Assistant Examiner: Vaughn; I.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Church; George L. Hess; J. Edward
Bisson; Barry A.
Claims
The invention claimed is:
1. A composition, useful as an anti-wear hydraulic oil or as a gear
lubricant, comprising major amounts of a mineral lubricating oil
and minor, effective and mutually compatible amounts of a secondary
zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate anti-wear agent, chelating type and
film forming type metal deactivators, and, as rust inhibitors, a
neutral barium salt of a petroleum sulfonate and an alkyl or aryl
substituted succinic acid or acid anhydride.
2. The composition of claim 1, wherein said mineral lubricating oil
consists essentially of oil having an SUS viscosity at
100.degree.F. in the range of 60-3,000 SUS and a viscosity-gravity
constant in the range of 0.780-0.819.
3. The composition of claim 1, wherein said chelating type metal
deactivator is an alkyl-substituted derivative of
2,5-di-mercapto-1,3,4-thiodiazole.
4. The composition of claim 1 wherein said film-forming type metal
deactivator is N,N'-disalicylidene-1,2-propane-diamine.
5. The composition of claim 3 wherein said film-forming type metal
deactivator is N,N'-disalicylidene-1,2-propane-diamine.
6. The composition of claim 1 wherein one said rust inhibitor is
tetraphenyl succinic anhydride.
7. The composition of claim 5 and containing tetra phenyl succinic
anhydride.
8. The composition of claim 7 wherein said lubricant is useful as a
hydraulic oil and contains effective and compatible minor amounts
of a naphthyl amine, zinc Dialkyldithiocarbamate and ditertiary
butyl paracresol.
9. The composition of claim 8 wherein said base oil consists
essentially of one or more hydrocracked oils having a viscosity
gravity constant below about 0.80 and which have been stabilized
against degradation by ultra violet light by extraction with an
aromatic selective solvent.
10. The composition of claim 9 and containing an effective amount
of an antifoaming agent.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Zinc dithiophosphates are widely used in lubricants as anti-wear
agents. Although ashless anti-wear materials have been gaining
prominence because of the absence of heavy metals, the zinc
dithiophosphates still continue to provide one of the most
economical sources of anti-wear protection. There are three general
types of zinc dithiophosphates from which to select, depending on
the specific application. The zincs are classified as either
primary, secondary, or aryl, depending on the alcohols from which
they are made, although the primary and secondary zincs are
commonly referred to as alkyl. If the R-O- group in the structure
for zinc dithiophosphate (shown below) is derived from a primary
alcohol, then the zinc is referred to as primary; likewise, if it
is derived from a secondary alcohol, it is referred to as secondary
and, if derived from an alkylated phenol, it is referred to as
aryl. ##EQU1## Each of these zincs usually displays a different
combination of performance properties as summarized below:
Performance Type of Zinc Dithiophosphate Characteristic Primary
Secondary Aryl ______________________________________ Wear
Protection Average Best Poorest Oxidation Inhibition Average Best
Poorest Thermal Stability Average Poorest Best Demulsibility Best
Average Poorest Cost Lowest Average Highest
______________________________________
Based on their relative performance levels, zincs are selected for
a particular application. For example, aryl zincs are used almost
exclusively in diesel engine oils because of their excellent
thermal stability. Primary zincs find a large application in both
engine oils and hydraulic oils. Secondary zincs are used mostly in
hydraulic oils, transmission and gear oils. Primary and secondary
zincs have been selected for these applications because of their
relatively good anti-wear performance, good anti-oxidant qualities
and low cost. Where hydraulic oils are concerned, primary zincs
have usually been preferred because they offered the best overall
performance for the lowest cost.
However, problems have been encountered when primary zincs are used
in certain axial in-line piston pumps. In these pumps, the bronze
piston pads slide on a steel swash plate. With certain
zinc-containing anti-wear hydraulic oils, a reaction occurred at
the interface of the bronze piston pads and the steel swash plate.
The reaction products raised the friction level between the sliding
surfaces and eventually generated enough heat to crack the swash
plate.
The present invention provides an anti-wear hydraulic oil
containing a secondary zinc and which provides superior performance
in vein pumps and piston pumps and especially with such
"bronze-on-steel" pumps.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An improved anti-wear hydraulic oil comprises major amounts of a
mineral lubricating oil (preferably a hydrocracked oil which has
been solvent extracted to improve ultra-violet light stability) and
minor amounts of a secondary zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate anti-wear
agent, chelating type and film forming type metal deactivators, a
neutral barium salt of a petroleum sulfonate and a succinic acid
based rust inhibitor. The hydraulic oil is especially useful in
lubrication of high output (e.g., 100 gallons per minute)
bronze-on-steel axial piston pumps.
The preferred mineral oils consist mainly of oils termed
"paraffinic" or "relatively paraffinic" by the viscosity gravity
constant classification. Especially useful are the stabilized,
hydrocracked oils described in copending U.S. Pat. applications
Ser. No. 178,193 filed Sept. 7, 1971 and Ser. No. 298,126, filed
Oct. 16, 1972 of Bryer et al. (the entire disclosure of which, and
of Ser. No. 35,231 below is incorporated herein). Blends of such
hydrocracked oils with a naphthenic acid-free naphthenic distillate
can also be used on the present invention. The "polymer" and "soap"
type antileak hydraulic oils shown in Ser. No. 35,231 of Griffith
et al. (filed May 6, 1970 and now abandoned) can also be made
containing the secondary zinc dialkyl dithiophosphates, for
anti-wear, if the two types of metal deactivator, a neutral barium
sulfonate and a succinic acid type rust inhibitor are included
therewith.
The relative proportions of the essential ingredients are
important. The weight ratio of the secondary zinc dialkyl
dithiophosphate to the total weight of the deactivator compounds is
generally no greater than about 15 to 1 (typically about 10 to
1).
The relative weight proportions of the succinic acid inhibitor and
the neutral barium petroleum sulfonate are generally in the range
of 3 to 1 to 1 to 1 (typically about 2 to 1). The relative
proportion of the neutral barium petroleum sulfonate to the total
metal deactivators is also important (and is best determined by
experiment) since if the relative amount of the barium compound is
too great, the hydrolytic stability of the lubricant will be poor
and high metal losses will be encountered in use in the pump.
FURTHER DESCRIPTION
To predict which kinds of zinc dithiophosphates would cause swash
plate cracking two test procedures are useful. One the beverage
bottle hydrolytic stability test, measures the corrosive nature of
the zinc-containing hydraulic oil in terms of metal loss and total
acidity. This test, as described in the ASTM handbook, also calls
for the amount of insolubles produced, the viscosity change of the
oil, and the acid number of the oil. For this particular hydraulic
oil problem, however, these data are not pertinent.
The other, the sludge and metal corrosion test, also measures
corrosiveness in terms of metal loss, but measures sludge produced
as well. The sludge and metal corrosion test is a combination
oxidation and corrosion test. This test is run using the same
conditions as the ASTM D 943 test. After a thousand hours, however,
the test is terminated and the oil is analyzed for the total amount
of sludge present, as well as the amounts of copper and iron
present in the combined oil, water and sludge fractions.
Before the beverage bottle hydrolytic stability test and the sludge
and metal corrosion tests were adopted to separate "good" and "bad"
zinc-containing hydraulic oils, preliminary work was done using the
low velocity friction apparatus to compare a secondary zinc
formulation which performed satisfactorily in piston pump service
with a primary zinc formulation which did not. This comparison gave
the first indication that there might be a significant difference
between primary and secondary zinc hydraulic oil formulations in
lubrication of a bronze-steel piston pump.
The low velocity friction apparatus is an instrument which measures
friction characteristics as a function of sliding speed and applied
load. For most testing, a steel anulus is used which rotates on a
steel plate. Both the anulus and plate are immersed in the test
oil. To simulate the sliding conditions of the bronze-on-steel
piston pump, however, a bronze anulus and a steel plate was used.
In this case, testing was aimed at generating reaction products,
rather than friction curves. At the end of the test the used oil
was analyzed for copper content and also visually inspected. As
shown by the results below, the primary zinc formulation showed a
significant increase in copper content, indicating a substantial
amount of reaction products. The secondary zinc formulation,
however, showed little change. Even more dramatic was the
difference in appearance of the two formulations at the end of the
test. The primary zinc showed very severe accumulation of black
reaction products; the secondary formulation remained clear.
Low Velocity Friction Apparatus Test
______________________________________ Oil Data Copper Content, ppm
Primary Zinc Secondary Zinc Formulation (A).sup.(2) Formulation
(D).sup.(2) New Oil 35 60 Used Oil 760 82 Appearance Heavy black
Clear debris Conditions: Bronze-on steel specimens, 200F, 80 lbs.
load, 8 ft/minutes sliding speed, 17 hours.
______________________________________ .sup.(a) These were fully
formulated anti-wear hydraulic oils containing, in addition to zinc
dithiophosphate, antioxidant, rust inhibitor and defoamer.
The beverage bottle hydrolytic stability test and the sludge and
metal corrosion test have been adopted as part of the anti-wear
hydraulic oil specification for the bronze-on-steel axial piston
pumps by certain pump manufacturers and the Military under the MIL
specification 24459. The hydrolytic stability test is an
ASTM-established test and is found in the current ASTM handbook
under ASTM D 2619-67. In the test, 75 grams of the anti-wear
hydraulic oil are added to 25 grams of distilled water in a
beverage bottle containing a copper strip. The bottle is capped and
placed in an oven where it rotates end over end at 5 rpm for 48
hours at 200.degree.F. At the end of the test, the weight loss of
the copper strip and the total acidity of the water layer are
determined. They are considered a measure of the corrosiveness of
the oil. Those anti-wear hydraulic oils which produce no more than
0.5 mg/cm.sup.2 of copper loss and no more than 6.0 mgKOH total
acidity in the water portion are considered satisfactory for
bronze-on-steel piston pump use, provided, of course, that they
also satisfy the other requirement--the sludge and metal corrosion
test. This test is a combination oxidation and corrosion test. It
is run using the same conditions as the more familiar ASTM D 943
Turbine Oil Oxidation Test. At the end of a 1000 hours, however,
the oxidation test is terminated and the oil is analyzed for total
sludge produced, as well as the copper and iron content of the
combined oil, water, and sludge portions. Maximum acceptable limits
for the test are:
Total insoluble sludge, mg 400 Total Copper, mg 200 Total iron, mg
100
Complete description of the test is found under Federal Test Method
3,020.1.
With the results of the LVFA preliminary testing in mind, we
evaluated the same primary zinc and secondary zinc formulations in
the hydrolytic stability and sludge and metal corrosion tests. The
results are shown in Table I. Note the converse relationship
between the two zincs in the two tests. The primary zinc-containing
formulations shows relatively poor hydrolytic stability primarily
because of high metal loss which we believe is the more crucial
part of this test. It does, however, perform well in the sludge and
metal corrosion test. The secondary zinc-containing formulation, on
the other hand, performed in the opposite fashion. It did
relatively well in hydrolytic stability, but poorly in sludge and
metal corrosion test.
The poor hydrolytic stability of this particular general-purpose
primary zinc was not unique. The hydrolytic stability of two other
similar general-purpose primary zincs was examined and relatively
high metal loss was found. These are identified as B and C in Table
II. Also shown in Table II is a secondary zinc, E, which shows the
same degree of metal loss as the general-purpose primaries,
indicating that the relatively low metal loss of the secondary
reference zinc was not characteristic of all secondary zincs.
One feature which these two tests do have in common is that they
both measure metal loss. Both the primary and secondary zinc were
showing metal loss, although in different forms. However, we
discovered that the combined use of two types of metal deactivators
can minimize metal loss.
There are two common types of metal deactivators. One, the
film-forming type, minimizes metal corrosion by plating out on the
metal surface. In effect, this puts a protective barrier between
the metal surface and the corrosive materials. The second type of
deactivator reduces metal loss by chelating or tieing up the
corrosive materials before they can catalyze further attack on the
surfaces.
When the same primary and secondary zinc formulations as above are
formulated using various types of metal deactivators, the results
are shown in Table III. Table III shows that
1. None of the deactivators improved the performance of the
general-purpose primary zinc dithiophosphates sufficiently to pass
the hydrolytic stability test.
2. Both the chelating and combination type of metal deactivators
were effective enough on the secondary zinc formulation for it to
pass the hydrolytic stability test. The improvement in minimizing
metal loss was substantial. Although the chelating metal
deactivator was more effective than the combination type in
improving hydrolytic stability, it had been linked to compatibility
problems in earlier work. Therefore, the combination type was
preferred because of its better compatibility. As shown in Table
IV, this deactivator was also effective in dramatically reducing
the sludge and metal corrosion of the secondary zinc
formulation.
These results show that the "primary zinc" should not be used in
formulations where hydrolytic stability was required. The secondary
zinc formulation was clearly superior. However, this lubricant is
still defective and requires for satisfactory performance the
surface active component, namely, two specific types of rust
inhibitors.
Although the use of the two combined metal deactivators represents
a major means of improving the hydrolytic stability of the
secondary zinc formulation, a far more successful lubricant is
obtained by the proper selection of rust inhibitors. The effect of
various types of rust inhibitors on the secondary zinc in the
presence and absence of the combination type metal deactivator is
shown in Table VI. Unlike the formulations shown in Table VI, these
blends were not fully formulated, but contained only the components
shown. Note that both the acidic and neutral type rust inhibitors
which are surface active enough to provide adequate protection as
measured by the ASTM D 665B test, also reacted with the zinc to
promote severe metal attack in the hydrolytic stability test. The
dibasic rust inhibitor which did not provide adequate rust
protection, however, did not promote metal attack. The presence of
the combination type metal deactivator did not substantially change
these results. Where the deactivator did produce a significant
change, however, was in the case of the mixed rust inhibitors which
consisted of both acidic and neutral components used separately
before. Without deactivator, metal attack occurred, but in the
presence of deactivator, metal attack was reduced within the
acceptable limits with no loss of rust protection. Obviously, the
combination of the acidic and neutral components provides a
balanced rust inhibitor which is surface active enough to protect
against rust, but not active enough to overpower the metal
deactivator.
With some commercially available secondary zinc dialkyl
dithiophosphates, a precipitate or haze will form when an effective
amount of the combination of the two types of metal deactivators is
incorporated therein. For example, such a precipitate formed with
E. This precipitate formation should be used as a screening test to
determine the better "secondary zincs" for use in the present
invention.
Based on the results discussed above, it can be seen that the
reactivity of zinc dithiophosphates, particularly in combination
with other components, has a significant effect on the bronze/steel
metallurgy found in some piston pumps. Specifically, these results
indicate that:
1. The secondary zinc reference formulation performed
satisfactorily in the axial piston pump because it is less reactive
than the general purpose primary zinc tested. These, being more
reactive, are unsuited for use in bronze-on-steel axial piston
pumps.
2. The film-forming, chelating, and combination types of
deactivators were not effective in reducing metal loss in
hydrolytic stability testing of the primary zinc examined. However,
the chelating and combination type deactivators were effective in
reducing metal loss of the secondary zinc formulation.
3. That rust inhibitors which are surface active enough to provide
good rust protection can react with the secondary zinc to promote
severe metal attack in the hydrolytic stability test. The presence
of a combination type deactivator is not effective in these
cases.
4. That the use of a mixed acidic-neutral type rust inhibitor with
the combination type metal deactivator provides adequate rust
protection without promoting metal attack.
Commercially available "primary" zinc dialkyl dithiophosphates are
well-known and include "Amoco 5959", "Elco 103" and "Oronite 269N".
Similarly, there are many commercially available secondary zinc
dialkyl dithiophosphates, e.g., "Lubrizol 677A" (the "reference" or
D of the present case), Lubrizol 1097, and Edwin Cooper "Hitec
E653" (identified as E herein).
The commercially available "chelating type" metal deactivators
include "Amoco 150" (an alkyl derivative of
2,5-di-mercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazole) and the related "compounds" in
U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,719,125; 2,719,126 and 2,983,716.
The commercially available film-forming type metal deactivators
include the benzotriazoles (e.g., Vanderbilt "BT Z" and U.S. Rubber
Company "Cobrate 99"), and the Vanderbilt products "Cuvan 80"
(N,N'-disalicylidene-1,2-propane-diamine, 80% in organic solvent),
"Cuvan 7676" and "Cuvan XL".
The commercially available neutral barium petroleum sulfonates
include NaSul BSN of R. T. Vanderbilt Co.
The commercially available acidic type rust inhibitors are
primarily substituted-succinic anhydrides (e.g., "TPSA" or
tetraphenyl succinic anhydride).
Accordingly, the following example is illustrative of lubricants
which can be produced in accordance with the present invention.
ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE
An additive mixture, for use in formulation of anti-wear hydraulic
oils containing a secondary dialkyl dithiophosphate, was made by
blending the following ingredients:
Weight % ditertiary butyl paracresol 20.0 naphthyl amine 20.0 zinc
diamyldithiocarbamate 3.0 tetraphenyl succinic anhydride 2.2
neutral barium petroleum sulfonate 1.5 "Amoco 150" chelate-type
deactivator 3.3 Cuvan 80 film-forming deactivator 6.7 diluent,
paraffinic oil 43.3 100.0
The additive mixture was blended as indicated below to make an
anti-wear hydraulic oil:
COMPOSITION, VOLUME % ______________________________________ UV
stable hydrocracked oil 99.23 Secondary ZDP ("D") 0.40 Additive
mixture 0.35 Silicone antifoam 0.02
______________________________________
The hydrocracked oil had an SUS viscosity at 100.degree.F of 200,
an ASTM VI of about 100 and was paraffinic by VGC class. The
properties (and typical control limits) of the blend (in metric
units) follow:
TYPICAL RANGE TESTS METHOD MIN. MAX. EXAM- PLE
______________________________________ # Viscosity, cSt/37.8C D445
42.9 46.2 44.6 Viscosity, cSt/40C D341 40.2 Viscosity, cSt/98.9C
D445 6.50 Viscosity, cSt/100C D341 6.33 Viscosity Index D2270 100
106 Flash COC, C D92 204 235 # Pour, C D97 -18 -18 Color D1500 2.0
0.5 Density/15c, kg/m.sup.3 D1298 873 861 Total Acid No., mgKOH/g
D664 1.0 Copper Strip, 3 hrs/100C D130 1 1 Sulfur, % D2622 0.14
Conradson Carbon, % D189 0.25 An line Point, C D611 112 #
Demulsibility/54.4C D1401 Separation, minutes 30 25 # Foam,
Tendency/Stability D892 Sequence I, cm.sup.3 50/0 25/0 Sequence II,
cm.sup.3 50/0 25/0 Sequence III, cm.sup.3 50/0 25/0 # Rust, Syn.
Sea Water D665B Pass Pass Oxidation Stability, hr. D943 2000 >
2000 Continental Oxid.,hr. 100 >100 4-Ball Wear Scar, mm 20 kg,
1800 rpm, 54.4C, 0.35 1hr # Appearance Visual Bright Bright # Zinc,
wt.% .044 .054 .048 Phosphorous, wt.% D1091 .039 .051 .044 # DBPC,
wt.% .070 .087 .077 ______________________________________
When non-hydrocracked solvent refined paraffinic oils are
substituted for the hydrocracked oil, 0.50% of the mixture is
required for equivalent performance.
Similarly, blends of hydrocracked and non-hydrocracked lubes can be
used in the present example, as can unstabilized hydrocracked oils;
however, in general the U.V. stabilized (by solvent extraction or
hydrorefining) hydrocracked lube provides the best performance at
lower additive levels.
Similarly, blends (as of 100 and 500 SUS, at 100.degree.F) of oils
can be substituted for the 200 SUS base oil and higher or lower
viscosity base oils (e.g., 80-2000 SUS) can be used, as in this
example, to make hydraulic oils of varied viscosities.
In commercial additives, the type and amount of ZDP can vary from
brand to brand of additive; however, in a given lubricant
formulation, the amount of a given ZDP can be determined by
calculation from the zinc content. As a rule of thumb, such
substitutions are done by the zinc equivalent method. In the above
example, the amount of additive should incorporated in the range of
0.044 to 0.054 Zn (typically 0.048 wt. %). In the work reported in
the Tables, the ZDP additives were used at about the same Zn
levels. The representative secondary ZDP, Lubrizol 677A (sometimes
identified as D) analyzes 9.25 wt. % Zn and 8.5 wt. % P.
Compositions according to the present invention can be made wherein
the viscosity of the base petroleum oil is in the range of 60-3,000
SUS at 100.degree.F. In general, for use as a hydraulic oil the
typical base oil viscosity will be below 1,000 SUS at
100.degree.F.; however, lubricants consisting essentially of a
1,000- 3,000 SUS at 100.degree.F base oil are useful as gear
lubricants (e.g., see Ser. No. 477,872, filed June 10, 1974, of
Williams, Reiland and Griffity, the entire disclosure of which is
incorporated herein).
The terms "compatible amount" and "mutually compatible amounts" as
used herein mean that no precipitate is observed in the final
lubricant when it is stored for 24 hours at about 65.degree.F.
Table I ______________________________________ COMPARISON OF
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ZDP* PERFORMANCE
______________________________________ Maximum Pri- Acceptable mary
Secondary Test Limits ZDP ZDP
______________________________________ ASTM D 2619 Results Beverage
Bottle Hydrolytic Stability Test -- Copper Wt. Loss, mg/cm.sup.2
0.5 3.5 0.5 -- Total Acidity of Water Layer, mgKOH 6.0 6.2 8.9
Federal 3020.1 Results Sludge & Metal Corrosion -- Insoluble
Sludge, mg 400 198 921 -- Metals in Combined Oil Water & Sludge
Copper, mg 200 76 306 Iron, mg 100 13 341
______________________________________ *Zinc
dialkyldithiophosphate?
The base oil, in all tables herein, was 200 SUS, at 100.degree.F,
"U.V" stabilized (by solvent extraction) hydrocracked oil (ASTM VI
about 100), available commercially as "Sunpar LW120" or "HPO 200",
from the Sun Oil Company. The lubricant contained 0.5 vol. % of the
ZDP, 0.07 wt. % ditertiary butyl paracresol, 0.07 wt. %
naphthalamine, 0.006 vol. % NaSul BSN, 0.0088 vol. % TPSA, 0.012 %
zinc Diamyldithiocarbamate (Vanlube AZ), and 2 ppm "active" silicon
antifoam.
Table II
__________________________________________________________________________
COMPARISON OF THE HYDROLYTIC STABILITY OF "ZDP" LUBRICANTS
__________________________________________________________________________
Maximum Acceptable Primary Formulations Secondary Formulation Test
Limits (A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
__________________________________________________________________________
Beverage Bottle Hydrolytic Stability Test, ASTM D 2619 -- Copper
Weight Loss, mg/cm.sup.2 0.5 3.5 1.5 2.4 0.5 2.09 -- Total Acidity
of Water Layer, mgKOH 6.0 6.2 33.0 2.5 8.9 1.20 The lubricants of
this Table (II) are fully formulated anti-wear hydraulic oils,
similar to Table I, containing, in addition to ZDP (0.5 vol. %),
antioxidant, rust inhibitor, and defoamer.
__________________________________________________________________________
Table III
__________________________________________________________________________
EFFECT OF METAL DEACTIVATORS IN HYDROLYTIC STABILITY OF ZDP
__________________________________________________________________________
LUBRICANTS Combination of Maximum Film-Forming & Acceptable
Film-Forming Type Chelating Type Chelating Types Test Limits
Primary Secondary Primary Secondary Primary Secondary
__________________________________________________________________________
Beverage Bottle Hydrolytic Stability Test (ASTM D 2619) Fail Fail
Fail Pass Fail Pass -- Copper Weight Loss, mg/cm.sup.2 0.5 0.61
0.33 2.59 0.0 4.25 0.03 -- Total Acidity of Water Layer, mgKOH 6.0
10.0 17.0 6.21 1.7 1.6 3.1 Formulations were similar to those of
Table I.
__________________________________________________________________________
Table IV
__________________________________________________________________________
EFFECT OF COMBINATION TYPE METAL DEACTIVATOR ON HYDROLYTIC
STABILITY AND SLUDGE AND METAL CORROSION TESTS OF SECONDARY ZDP
__________________________________________________________________________
(D) Maximum Acceptable Deactivator Deactivator Test Method Limits
Absent Present
__________________________________________________________________________
Beverage Bottle Hydrolytic ASTM Stability Test D 2619 -- Copper Wt.
Loss, mg/cm.sup.2 0.5 0.5 0.03 -- Total Acidity of Water Layer,
mgKOH 6.0 8.9 3.1 Sludge and Metal Corrosion Federal 3020.1 --
Insoluble Sludge, mg 400 921 288 -- Metals in Combined Oil, Water
and Sludge Copper, mg 200 306 173 Iron, mg 100 341 57 Formulations
similar to those of Table I.
__________________________________________________________________________
Table V
__________________________________________________________________________
EFFECT OF METAL DEACTIVATORS IN HYDROLYTIC STABILITY TESTING
__________________________________________________________________________
(1) (2) (3) Film-Forming Type Chelating-Type Combination of
(benzotriazole) (mercapto-thiodiazole) Film-Forming and Chelating
Types Primary Secondary Primary Secondary Primary Secondary Metal
Deactivator (A) (D) (A) (D) (A) (D)
__________________________________________________________________________
Beverage Bottle Hydrolytic Stability Test (ASTM D 2619) Fail Fail
Fail Pass Fail Pass -- Copper Weight Loss, mg/cm.sup.2 0.61 0.33
2.59 0.0 4.25 0.03 -- Total Acidity of Water Layer, mgKOH 10.0 17.0
6.2 1.7 1.6 5.6
__________________________________________________________________________
.sup.(1) R. T. Vanderbilt - "BTZ"? .sup.(2) "Amoco 150 .sup.(3) R.
T. Vanderbilt - "OD 691 Formulations were similar to those of Table
I
Table VI
__________________________________________________________________________
EFFECT OF RUST INHIBITORS ON REFERENCE SECONDARY ZINC
DITHIOPHOSPHATE*
__________________________________________________________________________
Secondary Zinc Secondary Zinc Secondary Zinc Secondary Zinc
Secondary Zinc without and "TPSA" and "Neutral Ba" and Dibasic Acid
and Mixed** Rust Inhibitor Rust Inhibitor Rust Inhibitor Rust
Inhibitor Rust Inhibitor Test Metal Deactivator Metal Deactivator
Metal Deactivator Metal Deactivator Metal Deactivator
__________________________________________________________________________
Hydrolytic Beverage Bottle Absent Present Absent Present Absent
Present Absent Present Absent Present Stability Test (ASTM D 2619)
-- Copper Weight Loss, mg/cm.sup.2 0.26 0.40 3.29 2.04 2.67 4.29
0.37 0.45 1.87 0.17 -- Total Acidity of Water Layer, mgKOH 2.86
1.80 11.78 14.0+ 1.68 0.56 1.18 1.40 2.24 3.37 Rust Protection,
Synthetic Sea Water (ASTM D 665B) Fail Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass
Fail Fail Pass Pass
__________________________________________________________________________
*Basic Formulation 0.40 vol. % zinc dithiophosphate in 200 SUS/100
F paraffinic base oil (solvent-extracted after hydrocracking) rust
inhibitors, 0.10 volume %. Combination of acid "TPSA" and neutral
"Ba" (barium petroleum sulfonate) rust inhibitors.
* * * * *