U.S. patent number 3,923,560 [Application Number 05/372,432] was granted by the patent office on 1975-12-02 for low-carbon steel sheets temper-rolled after the final anneal to improve magnetic properties.
This patent grant is currently assigned to United States Steel Corporation. Invention is credited to Lester J. Regitz.
United States Patent |
3,923,560 |
Regitz |
December 2, 1975 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
Low-carbon steel sheets temper-rolled after the final anneal to
improve magnetic properties
Abstract
Low-carbon sheet steel having inproved magnetic properties is
produced by hot rolling the steel to about 0.050 to 0.100 inch
thick sheet such that the temperature thereof is 1430.degree. to
1620.degree.F when the steel is finished, and 900.degree. to
1200.degree.F when the steel is coiled. The steel is then pickled
and cleaned, coldrolled to effect a thickness reduction of 40 to 80
percent, annealed to effect recrystallization, and temper-rolled to
effect a plastic elongation of 6 to 10 percent.
Inventors: |
Regitz; Lester J. (Penn
Township, Westmoreland County, PA) |
Assignee: |
United States Steel Corporation
(Pittsburgh, PA)
|
Family
ID: |
22474444 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/372,432 |
Filed: |
December 2, 1975 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
136805 |
Apr 23, 1971 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
148/120; 148/122;
148/603; 148/121; 148/306 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C21D
8/1233 (20130101); C21D 8/1222 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
C21D
8/12 (20060101); H01F 001/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;148/120,121,122,110,111,31.55,11.5,12,12.1,14 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
695,795 |
|
Oct 1964 |
|
CA |
|
707,731 |
|
Apr 1965 |
|
CA |
|
Other References
Hayes, R; Trans. Asm., 25, (1937), pp. 146-147 &
154-157..
|
Primary Examiner: Satterfield; Walter R.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sexton; Forest C.
Parent Case Text
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This is a continuation-in-part application of application Ser. No.
136,805 filed Apr. 23, 1971, now abandoned.
Claims
I claim:
1. A process for producing low-carbon sheet steel for magnetic
applications consisting of; forming a steel slab consisting of 0.02
to 0.10 percent carbon, 0.40 to 0.60 percent manganese, 0.02 to
0.09 percent phosphorus, 0.025 maximum percent sulfur, 0.010
maximum percent silicon and the balance iron and residual
impurities; hot rolling said slab to a thickness of 0.050 to 0.100
inch with a finishing temperature within the range 1430.degree. to
1620.degree.F; coiling the hot rolled steel at a temperature of
900.degree. to 1200.degree.F; cooling the coiled steel to ambient
temperature; cleaning the steel to remove mill scale; cold rolling
the cleaned steel to effect a thickness reduction of 40 to 80
percent; annealing the cold rolled steel at a temperature of
1125.degree. to 1300.degree.F to effect recrystallization thereof;
and finally temper rolling the annealed steel sufficient to effect
a plastic elongation of 6 to 10 percent to improve the steel's
magnetic properties such that at 18.5 mils the steel will exhibit a
permeability in excess of 6000 with core losses of less than 1.3
watts/lb. when subjected to an induction of 10 kilogauss, and
exhibit a permeability in excess of 4000 with core losses of less
then 3.0 when subjected to an induction of 15 kilogauss; while at
25 mils the steel will exhibit a permeability in excess of 4800
with core losses less than 1.8 when subjected to an induction of 10
kilogauss and exhibit a permeability in excess of 3000 with core
losses less than 4.2 when subjected to an induction of 15
kilogauss.
2. The process of claim 1 in which said temper rolling effects a
plastic elongation of 7 to 9 percent.
3. A low-carbon sheet steel for magnetic applications produced by
the process consisting of hot rolling a steel slab consisting of
0.02 to 0.10 percent carbon, 0.40 to 0.60 percent manganese, 0.02
to 0.09 percent phosphorus, 0.025 maximum percent sulfur, 0.010
maximum percent silicon and the balance iron and residual
impurities to a thickness of 0.050 to 0.100 inch with a finishing
temperature within the range 1430.degree. to 1620.degree.F, coiling
the hot rolled steel at a temperature of 900.degree.-1200.degree.F,
cooling the coil, cleaning the coil to remove mill scale, cold
rolling the cleaned hot rolled steel to effect a thickness
reduction of 40 to 80 percent, annealing the cold rolled steel to
effect recrystallization thereof, and finally temper rolling said
annealed steel sufficient to effect a plastic elongation of 6 to 10
percent, said steel characterized by excellent magnetic properties
such that at 18.5 mils the steel will exhibit a permeability in
excess of 6000 with core losses of less than 1.3 watts/lb. when
subjected to an induction of 10 kilogauss, and exhibit a
permeability in excess of 4000 with core losses of less than 3.0
when subjected to an induction of 15 kilogauss; while at 25 mils
the steel will exhibit a permeability in excess of 4800 with core
losses less than 1.8 when subjected to an induction of 10 kilogauss
and exhibit a permeability in excess of 3000 with core losses less
than 4.2 when subjected to an induction of 15 kilogauss.
4. The steel of claim 3 in which said temper rolling effects a
plastic elongation of 7 to 9 percent.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Because of their superior magnetic properties, silicon sheet steels
are widely used in the production of magnetic core components in
electrical equipment such as motors, generators, transformers, and
the like. These favorable magnetic properties, namely high magnetic
permeability, high electrical resistance and low hysteresis losses,
will minimize wasteful conversion of electrical energy into heat,
and will therefore permit manufacture of electrical equipment
having greater power and efficiency. In order to effect and
optimize the desired magnetic properties, however, the silicon
sheet steels must be produced under carefully controlled and
exacting processing parameters. Silicon sheet steels are therefore
substantially more expensive than other more conventional flat
rolled steel products.
In the high volume manufacture of small electrical equipment for
consumer appliances, toys and the like, unit cost is perhaps the
most important consideration, far outweighing equipment efficiency
and power considerations. For these applications, therefore,
electrical equipment manufacturers frequently utilize the less
expensive, more conventional low-carbon sheet steels for magnetic
core components. Hence, there is a considerable market for
low-carbon sheet steels having acceptable magnetic properties for
magnetic core applications.
In the course of producing low-carbon sheet steels for magnetic
applications, economic considerations have dictated that expensive
processing steps be avoided and that even the inexpensive steps be
minimized. Therefore, even though elaborate processes have been
developed for producing low-carbon sheet steels having exceptional
magnetic properties, such processes have not been adapted
commercially, because the use of such processes would greatly add
to the cost of the product, while not improving the magnetic
properties of the resultant sheet to equal those of silicon sheet
steels having comparable cost of production. To be of any
commercial value, therefore, any new process for improving the
magnetic properties of low-carbon sheet steels must be one that
will not significantly increase the steel's production cost.
Commercially, therefore, low-carbon sheet steels for magnetic
applications are produced from conventional low-carbon steel heats
having less than 0.1 percent carbon and the usual residual elements
at normal levels for cold-rolled products. The rolling procedures
are similar to those used for other cold-rolled products.
Specifically, the production steps are usually limited to hot
rolling a low-carbon ingot to slab form; hot rolling the slab to
sheet form; pickling the hot rolled sheet, cold rolling the pickled
sheet for a reduction of 40 to 80 percent; and annealing the sheet
to effect recrystallization, generally in a box annealing furnace.
An optional final temper roll of from 1/2 to 2 percent is sometimes
provided for the purpose of flattening the resultant sheet and make
it better suited for subsequent slitting and punching operations.
To optimize flatness, and hence suitability for slitting and
punching, temper rolling elongations are minimized at 1/2 to 2
percent.
The commercially produced low-carbon sheet steels for magnetic
applications, when rolled to 18.5 mils thickness, typically exhibit
permeabilities in the rolled direction of from 5000 to 6000 at 10
kilogauss, with core losses of from 1.3 to 1.6 watts/lb. For the
same thickness at 15 kilogauss, permeabilities in the rolled
direction typically range from 2000 to 4000 with core losses of 3.0
to 4.0 watts/lb. Sheets rolled to 25 mils typically exhibit
permeabilities in the rolled direction of from 4200 to 4800, with
core losses of 1.8 to 2.0 watts/lb. at 10 kilogauss; and
permeabilities in the rolled direction of from 2000 to 3000 with
core losses of 4.2 to 4.8 watts/lb. at 15 kilogauss.
These relatively wide ranges in magnetic properties reflect an
established tendency on the part of industry to deemphasize
magnetic properties in low-carbon sheet steel and emphasize low
cost of production. Nevertheless, customers have recently begun to
demand improved magnetic properties, particularly at 15kilogauss,
without an appreciable increase in cost. As noted above, producers
have been hard pressed to improve magnetic properties in these
steels without substantial increases in production costs.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention is predicated upon my discovery that temper rolling
the cold rolled and annealed low-carbon sheet steel between very
critical elongation limits of from 6 to 10 percent will very
significantly enhance the steel's magnetic properties to values
never before attained in non-silicon sheet steels. Since the other
process steps may be substantially the same as those presently
practiced commercially, the single modification provided by this
invention, i.e., the increased temper-rolling elongation, does not
significantly increase the cost of the product.
It is an object of this invention to provide a new process for
producing low-carbon sheet steel having improved magnetic
properties without a significant increase in production costs.
It is another object of this invention to provide a new
temper-rolling procedure to be used in the manufacture of
low-carbon sheet steel for magnetic applications.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a low-carbon
sheet steel having improved magnetic properties.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIGS. 1 through 4 are graphs showing test results of one
experimental heat described at the end of this specification. The
graphs show permeabilities and core losses at 10 and 15 kilogauss
as a function of percent temper-rolling elongation.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In the preferred practice of this invention, the starting steel
should have a composition substantially the same as those
low-carbon sheet steels presently produced commercially.
Specifically, the composition of the steel is usually as follows:
0.02 to 0.10 percent carbon; 0.40-0.60 percent max. manganese;
0.02-0.09 percent max. phosphorus; 0.025 percent max. sulfur; and
0.010 percent max. silicon; the balance iron and other typical
unintentional impurities.
To produce the sheet steel in accordance with the preferred
practice of this invention, a steel heat, having the above
composition, is cast into ingot form and then hot rolled to slab
form in accordance with conventional slabbing mill practices, or
continuously cast into slab form in accordance with conventional
continuous casting practice. The slab is then reheated and hot
rolled to sheet having a thickness of about 0.06 inch or between
0.05 and 0.100 inch, such that the finishing temperature upon exit
from the finishing roll train is within the range 1430.degree. to
1620.degree.F. The sheet is thereafter cooled with water sprays so
that it is coiled at a temperature of from 900.degree. to
1200.degree.F. The preferred hot rolling practice is to attain a
temperature within the range 1900.degree. to 1950.degree.F when the
steel is about 1 inch thick, and 1460.degree. to 1600.degree.F when
the steel is finished.
After cooling, the steel is suitably pickled to remove mill scale
and then cold rolled to effect a thickness reduction of from 40 to
80 percent. Thereafter, the sheet is suitably annealed to effect
recrystallization. The annealing is preferably performed in a box
annealing furnace at a temperature of from 1125.degree. to
1300.degree.F for 3 to 30 hours.
In some commercial operations the annealing of the cold rolled
sheet steel completes the process and the steel is sold thereafter.
The most common commercial practice however, has been to temper
roll the annealed sheet effecting plastic elongations no greater
than 2 percent for the purpose of improving the sheet's flatness
and thus enhance its slitting and punching characteristics and
render it more suitable for laminated end products. Elongations in
excess of 2 percent are avoided because such elongations will
usually result in distortions of sheet flatness and variations in
gage, or thickness, across the sheet width.
The crux of this invention resides in the unexpected discovery that
sheet steel produced in accordance with the above process can be
provided with very substantially improved magnetic properties if
the final temper roll is sufficient to provide a plastic elongation
within the critial range of from 6 to 10 percent, and preferably
between 7 and 9 percent. As noted above, the prior art low-carbon
sheet steel rolled to a thickness of 18.5 mils and tested at 10
kilogauss, typically exhibit permeabilities of 5000 to 6000, with
core losses of from 1.3 to 1.6 watts/lb. In contrast thereto, sheet
steels produced in accordance with this invention will exhibit
optimum permeabilities of about 7200 and core losses of about 1.1
watts/lb. Table I below contrasts the optimum magnetic properties
achieved by the practice of this invention with the magnetic
properties obtainable in prior art steels for two different
thicknesses and tested at two different inductions.
TABLE I
__________________________________________________________________________
Magnetic Properties Achieved by Inventive Process Contrasted to
Prior Art Thickness Induction Core Losses Steel (Mils) (Kilogauss)
Permeability (Watts/lb.)
__________________________________________________________________________
Prior Art 18.5 10 5000-6000 1.3-1.6 This Invention 18.5 10 7200 1.1
Prior Art 18.5 15 2000-4000 3.0-4.0 This Invention 18.5 15 5500 2.5
Prior Art 25 10 4200-4800 1.8-2.0 This Invention 25 10 5200 1.5
Prior Art 25 15 2000-3000 4.2-4.8 This Invention 25 15 4200 3.8
__________________________________________________________________________
In considering the above table, it should of course be realized
that the magnetic properties finally achieved will vary somewhat
from sample to sample even when identical process parameters are
employed. Nevertheless, the ranges of magnetic properties shown
above for the prior art steels are the usual optimum values, for
indeed many low-carbon sheet steels are sold for magnetic
applications having magnetic properties inferior to those optimum
values shown in Table I for prior art steels. By the same token,
not all steels processed in accordance with the process disclosed
herein will have the optimum magnetic properties shown in Table I.
Nevertheless, if the process is rigourously adhered to and there
are no adverse factors to account for, e.g., physically damaged
sheet, then magnetic properties superior to the best prior art
properties can be consistantly achieved. For example, at 18.5 mils
and testing at 10 kilogauss, not all samples of sheet processed
according to this invention will have permeabilities as high as
7200 core losses as low as 1.1 watts/lb. Nevertheless, the results
should consistantly provide permeabilities in excess of 6000 and
core losses less than 1.3 watts/lb. Accordingly, even the more
inferior samples of steel produced in accordance with this
invention will have magnetic properties superior to the best of the
prior art steels.
The following test is presented here to illustrate the critical
nature of this invention. For this test, a single heat of steel was
prepared having the following ladle analysis:
Carbon 0.07 % Manganese 0.57 % Phosphorus 0.06 % Sulfur 0.021%
Silicon 0.003% Copper 0.01 % Nickel 0.01 % Chromium 0.02 %
Molybdenum 0.01 % Tin 0.006%
This heat was cast into ingot form and hot-rolled first to slab
form and then to 0.060 inch thick sheet. Hot rolling was controlled
such that the sheet was at a temperature of 1950.degree.F at 1 inch
thickness, and exited the final rolls at 1440.degree.F. Prior to
coiling, the hot rolled sheet was cooled to 1180.degree.F with
water sprays.
The hot rolled sheet was then segmented into five portions, and
cold rolled to various gages, such that the final or temper rolling
following annealing, various degrees of deformation could be
imposed in reducing the sheets to one of two final thicknesses. The
intermediate thicknesses, final thicknesses and degree of temper
rolling are shown in Table II below.
TABLE II
__________________________________________________________________________
Reduction Schedules and 60-Hertz Magnetic Properties 10 Kilogauss
15 Kilogauss Intermediate Percent Percent Core Loss, Core Loss,
Gage, inches Elongation Reduction w/lb. Permeability w/lb.
Permeability
__________________________________________________________________________
0.0185 Inch Thick Sheet 0.0188 1.6 1.5 1.52 5618 3.70 2055 0.0195
5.5 5.1 1.45 5629 3.07 5004 0.0200 8.0 7.8 1.12 7246 2.54 5456
0.0204 10.2 9.3 1.32 5905 3.02 4639 0.0222 20.0 16.7 1.48 5391 3.42
3409 0.0250 Inch Thick Sheet 0.0254 1.6 1.5 1.84 4761 4.62 2679
0.0263 5.0 4.9 1.83 4545 4.23 4054 0.0270 8.0 7.8 1.50 5155 3.79
4286 0.0275 10.0 9.1 1.84 4348 4.34 3661 0.0300 20.0 16.7 1.92 4348
4.69 3000
__________________________________________________________________________
Following the reduction to intermediate gage, the sheets were box
annealed for 12 hours at 1200.degree.F in a nitrogen atmosphere
containing 10 percent hydrogen and having a dewpoint of about
70.degree.F. The sheets were then temper rolled as indicated in the
above table and sheared into test strips. The longitudinal test
strips were annealed for one hour at 1450 in the above atmosphere
to relieve shearing strains, and the magnetic properties thereafter
measured at 60 Hertz. The resulting properties are tabulated in the
above table and shown graphically in FIG 1-4, which are plots of
permeability and core losses as a function of percent plastic
elongation at 10 and 15 kilogauss. The superior effect of temper
rolling between 6 and 10 percent elongation is clearly
demonstrated.
* * * * *