U.S. patent number 3,921,695 [Application Number 05/510,350] was granted by the patent office on 1975-11-25 for wand operated venetian blind.
Invention is credited to Victor Debs.
United States Patent |
3,921,695 |
Debs |
November 25, 1975 |
Wand operated venetian blind
Abstract
Unless the person closing the blind halts rotation of the wand
forthwith upon maximum normal closure of the blind being reached
and thereby obviates overpull on the ladders, the tilting action of
the tilter of the present invention is automatically suspended to
protect the blind against the possibility of deleterious overpull
on the ladders by the continued rotation of the wand. At the same
time, retrogression of the blind from maximum normal closure is
prevented or at least limited.
Inventors: |
Debs; Victor (Staten Island,
NY) |
Family
ID: |
24030389 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/510,350 |
Filed: |
September 30, 1974 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
160/176.1R;
74/457; 160/177R; 74/435; 74/505 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E06B
9/322 (20130101); Y10T 74/19949 (20150115); Y10T
74/19874 (20150115); Y10T 74/2048 (20150115) |
Current International
Class: |
E06B
9/28 (20060101); E06B 9/322 (20060101); E06B
009/307 () |
Field of
Search: |
;160/176 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Kannan; Philip C.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. In connection with a Venetian blind that is closed in either
direction, i.e., by tilting the slats in either direction from
their horizontal position, the slats being tilted by motion
transmitted to them from a gear, the gear being rotated by a worm,
and the worm being rotated by a manually rotated wand that is
connected to the worm,--the method of protecting the blind against
deleterious overpull on the ladders and also preventing
retrogressive opening movement of the blind from its closed
position regardless of the direction of closure, said method
comprising:
providing the gear with teeth extending over a portion only of the
periphery of the gear and permitting the gear, upon continued
rotation of the gear in either direction, to rotate out of mesh
with the worm and then retrogress a little,
and selecting the number of teeth on the gear, selecting their
position on the periphery of the gear, and selecting their
circumferential pitch (a) to cause the gear to be on the verge of
rotating out of mesh with the worm upon the blind reaching its
closed position in either direction and (b) to permit the gear to
rotate out of mesh with the worm at a point that is a little beyond
the point at which the blind reaches its closed position and which
is at least as far beyond such point as the retrogression of the
gear upon the gear rotating out of mesh with the worm.
2. A Venetian blind that is closed in either direction, i.e., by
tilting the slats in either direction from their horizontal
position, the slats being tilted by motion transmitted to them from
a gear, the gear being rotated by a worm, and the worm being
rotated by a manually rotated wand that is connected to the
worm--wherein the improvement comprises:
the gear is a sector of less than 360.degree. and is on the verge
of rotating out of mesh with the worm upon the blind reaching its
closed position in either direction, the gear retrogresses a little
upon rotating out of mesh with the worm,
and the point at which the gear rotates out of mesh with the worm
is a little beyond the point at which the blind reaches its closed
position and at least as far beyond such point as the retrogression
of the gear upon rotating out of mesh with the worm,
whereby the retrogression of the gear takes place entirely beyond
the point at which the blind reaches its closed position and,
thereby, the blind is protected against retrogressive opening
movement.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The slats of a wand operated Venetian blind are tilted by manually
rotating a wand, also called a baton. The wand rotatively drives
the worm of a worm-and-gear tilter. The worm rotates the gear and,
by suitable and known means, the movement of the gear is
transmitted to the ladders and rendered effective to tilt the slats
of the blind by pulling up the rear sidepieces of the ladders while
paying out the front sidepieces, or vice versa.
Continued tilting of the slats closes the blind to its maximum
normal closure. The point of maximum normal closure, in the usual
Venetian blind, is reached before the edge of each slat would move
against the face of an adjacent slat; the lift cords interfere with
such full closure except in the case of a so-called full closure
blind such as, for example, the blind disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
3,170,505. When the point of maximum normal closure has been
reached the person closing the blind ordinarily halts the rotation
of the wand. However, a person may fail to timely halt his rotation
of the wand; he may be inattentive, or he may suppose that he can
close the blind still more by continued rotation of the wand.
When the point of maximum normal closure has been reached,
continued rotation of the wand causes overpull on the ladders; and
the overpull can become deleterious in one or more ways. The
overpull may jamb the top slat against the head of the blind. Also,
it may cause the top slat to flip over or try to, particularly in
the case of a narrow slat blind. In the case of the blind of U.S.
Pat. 3,799,237, in which the top slat coacts with a cord-lock
actuator, it is possible for overpull on the ladders to foul the
cord lock. In any case, excessive continued rotation of the wand
after the blind has reached its maximum normal closure can cause
excessive tension to be exerted on sidepieces of the ladders and/or
on those rungs of the ladders which are drawing the top slat
against the bottom of the head channel.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The gear of the tilter is a sector of less than 360.degree.,
whereby the gear can run out of mesh with the worm. Applicant's
construction and arrangement are such that, when maximum normal
closure of the blind has been reached, the gear is on the verge of
running out of mesh with the worm--meaning that small additional
movement of the gear would cause the gear to run out of mesh with
the worm. At this point the person closing the blind would normally
halt his rotation of the wand. Should he fail to do so, the gear
will promptly run out of mesh with the worm to suspend tilting
action of the tilter before deleterious overpull on the ladders has
taken place. Continued rotation of the wand will then be
ineffective, and will be harmless accordingly.
Many, perhaps most, Venetian blinds are arranged to be closed by
tilting the slats in either direction. If the blind be one which is
arranged for closure in either direction the tilter will provide,
as regards each direction, for the gear running out of mesh with
the worm unless rotation of the wand is halted promptly upon the
maximum normal closure of the blind being reached. If the blind be
one which is arranged for closure in one direction only, the tilter
need provide, as regards that direction only, for the gear running
out of mesh with the worm.
The slats of the blind are tilted to closed position by pulling up
either the front or the rear sidepieces of the ladders. The pull on
the sidepieces means that there is back pull by the sidepieces
themselves, and this back pull is fairly strong as the blind
approaches maximum normal closure. The back pull is transmitted to
the tilter and biases the gear retrogressively. The end tooth of
the gear having run out of mesh with the worm, and the thread of
the worm having slipped past the end tooth, the retrogressive bias
of the gear causes the gear to retrogress a little--the
retrogression being arrested by the end tooth of the gear sector
engaging the worm convolution somewhat back of the point at which
the tooth ran out of mesh with the worm. To prevent, or at least
limit, retrogression of the blind from maximum normal closure, the
point at which the gear is to run out of mesh with the worm is
placed somewhat beyond the point at which maximum normal closure of
the blind is reached, whereby all or some of the retrogression of
the gear will have taken place before the gear has retrogressed to
the point at which maximum normal closure of the blind was
reached.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING,
OF WHICH THERE IS ONE SHEET
FIG. 1 is a largely diagrammatic front elevation of a Venetian
blind embodying the invention, the "front" of the blind being the
face that is toward the room.
FIG. 2 is essentially a front elevation of a fragment of the head
of the blind, on a larger scale, a portion of the front wall of the
head channel being broken out to reveal the tilter.
FIG. 3 is essentially a section of the head, taken generally on the
line 3--3 of FIG. 2. A fragment of the ladder-and-slat assembly is
indicated including a fragment of a lift cord. The blind is fully
open, the slats being horizontal, i.e., untilted.
FIG. 4 is the same as FIG. 3 but with the blind and tilter at the
point of maximum normal closure with the slats tilted forwardly,
i.e., tilted with the front edges of the slats depressed.
FIG. 5 is the same as FIG. 3 but with the blind and tilter at the
point of maximum normal closure with the slats tilted rearwardly,
i.e., tilted with the rear edges of the slats depressed.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENTLY PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE
INVENTION
The drawing shows the presently preferred embodiment of the
invention, i.e., the best mode thus far contemplated of carrying
out the invention. Except as may be otherwise indicated, the
description hereinafter (prior to the claims) refers only to the
particular embodiment of the invention that is shown in the
drawing. Nevertheless, the disclosure is by way of illustration and
example; the claims embrace other embodiments of the invention.
Except for the tilter and the coordination of the tilter with the
ladders, both of which will be described and explained later, the
blind may be a wand operated Venetian blind of suitable known
construction and arrangement, for example, the construction and
arrangement disclosed in the U.S. patent of Lorentzen et al. U.S.
Pat. No. 3,425,479 issued Feb. 4, 1969. The known construction and
arrangement that is disclosed in the present application is the
construction and arrangement of the blind of that patent.
A ladder-and-slat assembly that is designated as a whole by 15 is
positioned beneath a head which is designated as a whole by 16. The
ladder-and-slat assembly includes a series of slats 17 that are
supported and articulated together in known manner by two or more
ladders 18. Each ladder 18 has a front sidepiece 18a and a rear
sidepiece 18b, the two sidepieces being interconnected by
vertically-spaced crosspieces or rungs 18c on which the slats 17
rest. The ladder shown is of the "string" type, the sidepieces 18a
and 18b being braided cords and each crosspiece 18c being a
plurality of filaments which may be braided or twisted into one or
more strands.
The had 16 consists primarily of a sheet-steel channel 20 and the
mechanism that is contained therein. The channel 20 has a front
wall 20a, a rear wall 20b and a bottom wall 20c. Along the upper
edges of the front and rear walls 20a and 20b there are
longitudinally-extending flanges 20d which are folded inwardly and
downwardly. The bottom wall 20c is pierced in known manner (not
shown) for passage into the channel 20 of each sidepiece 18a and
18b of the ladders and each lift cord 22 (one shown).
The Venetian blind, designated as a whole by 14 in FIG. 1, is shown
diagrammatically as being mounted in conventional manner within a
window opening. The head 16 of the blind is mounted on conventional
installation brackets 5, one attached to each of the jambs 6 of the
window opening. The soffit of the window opening is indicated at 7
and the sill at 8.
The construction, arrangement and operation of the tilter will now
be described. The tilter, which is designated as a whole by 40,
includes a housing that is mounted in the head channel 20.
Journalled within the housing there is a double thread worm 41 and
a gear 42. The worm is molded in one piece with a shaft 45 that
projects as shown through an opening 20g in the head channel, which
opening is spread over an area that includes the juncture of the
front wall 20a and the bottom wall 20c. Hanging down in front of
the ladder-and-slat assembly 15 (FIG. 1), and suitably connected to
the worm shaft 45, there is a wand 38 which is manually rotated to
rotatively drive the worm 41.
The wand 38 and its connection to shaft 45 may be as in U.S. Pat.
No. 3,425,479. Except for the gear 42, the coordination of the gear
42 with the worm 41 and the coordination of the gear 42 with the
ladders 18, the tilter 40 and its mounting in the head channel 20
are the same as in U.S. Pat. No. 3,425,479. FIG. 3 shows the
relationship between the worm 41 and the gear 42 when the gear is
in mid position, i.e., half-way between its limit of rotation
clockwise and its limit of rotation counter-clockwise. As a matter
of mechanical convenience in the particular tilter, a radius of the
gear 42 does not intersect the worm half-way between the ends of
the worm 41 but intersects the worm nearer the top end of the
worm.
The gear 42 is a sector of less than 360 degrees, the particular
gear shown being a sector which is eight-thirteenths of 360.degree.
. The gear is driven by the worm; and rotation of the gear in
either direction is limited by the end tooth of the gear section
being brought to the worm and then pushed as far as the worm can
push it. FIG. 4 shows the relationship between the worm 41 and the
gear 42 when the gear is on the verge of running out of mesh with
the worm by clockwise rotation. FIG. 5 shows the relationship
between the worm 41 and the gear 42 when the gear is on the verge
of running out of mesh with the worm by counter-clockwise
rotation.
The construction and arrangement of the blind of U.S. Pat. No.
3,425,479 is used in the present instance to transmit the movement
of the gear 42 to the ladders 15 and render the movement of the
gear effective to tilt the slats 17 by pulling up the front
sidepieces 18a while paying out the rear sidepieces 18b or vice
versa. As in the blind of U.S. Pat. No. 3,425,479, the gear 42 is
coaxial with a steel tilt rod 24 of D-shaped cross section, which
rod is also called a D rod. The rod 24 makes a sliding fit with a
D-shaped hole 24' in the hub of the gear 42, and the rod extends
across the tops of the ladders 15. At the ladders the tilt rod 24
carries drums (not shown) to which the sidepieces 18a and 18b of
the ladders are suitably attached, e.g., as disclosed in U.S. Pat.
No. 3,425,479.
An increment of angular movement of the gear 42 does not effect a
particular increment of tilting movement of the slats 17 regardless
of the means by which the movement of the gear is transmitted to
the slats or regardless of the width of the slats. What an
increment of angular movement of the gear 42 does do is to effect a
like increment of angular movement of the tilt rod 24 and the drums
that are mounted thereon and to which the ladder sidepieces 18a and
18b are attached. How much the sidepieces of the ladders are raised
or lowered by a given increment of angular movement of the drums
will be governed by the radius of the drums. And how much the slats
are tilted by a particular increment of up and down movement of the
sidepieces 18a and 18b will be affected by the distance between the
two sidepieces of a ladder which, in turn, is governed by the width
of the slats. The net result is that the gear sector 42 should be
coordinated with the slats for the particular blind in which the
tilter is to be used.
In the blind of U.S. Pat. No. 3,425,479 the drums to which the
ladders are attached are in mid position, and the slats are
untilted as shown in FIG. 3 of the present application, when the
flat of the D-rod 24 is horizontal and is at the top. With the gear
sector 42 in the mid rotative position shown in FIG. 3, the
necessary rotative indexing of the D-hole 24' in the hub of the
gear 42 can be established; the hole 24' will be rotatively indexed
to place the flat of the hole 24' horizontal and on top when the
drums are in mid position and the slats are untilted. Then the
teeth of the gear sector 42 can be layed out. The circular pitch of
the teeth and the number on each side of the mid point are selected
to have the gear on the verge of running out of mesh with the worm
when the slats 17 have been tilted to the point of maximum normal
closure of the blind.
In the present case the gear has eight teeth and the eight teeth
take up eight-thirteenths of the circumference of the gear 42. The
number of teeth being even, the sector has a center pair of teeth
rather than a center tooth. In FIG. 3 the center pair of teeth of
the gear 42 is in mesh with the worm 41. Proceeding
counter-clockwise from the center pair of teeth, the sector is
provided with three teeth the end tooth of which is tooth t.sub. 1.
Proceeding clockwise from the center pair of teeth the gear sector
42 is provided with three teeth the end tooth of which is t.sub.2 .
Rotating the wand in the direction of the arrow in FIG. 4, the end
tooth t.sub. 1 is brought to the worm 41 and is on the verge of
running out of mesh with the worm when the blind has been brought
to its maximum normal closure by tilting the slats forwardly; this
is shown in FIG. 4. Rotating the wand in the direction of the arrow
in FIG. 5, the end tooth t.sub. 2 is brought to the worm 41 and is
on the verge of running out of mesh with the worm when the blind
has been brought to its maximum normal closure by tilting the slats
rearwardly; this is shown in FIG. 5.
Once maximum normal closure has been reached in either direction,
the gear 42 will run out of mesh with the worm 41 unless rotation
of the wand 38 is halted promptly. However, a little additional
rotation of the gear 42 is required to cause the gear to run out of
mesh with the worm. When the gear does run out of mesh with the
worm, the gear will retrogress a little as has been explained. But
unless the retrogression brings the gear farther back than the
point at which maximum normal closure was reached, there will be no
retrogression of the blind from maximum normal closure. The
retrogression of the blind from maximum normal closure is limited
accordingly and may be completely obviated. Preferably each end
tooth t.sub. 1 and t.sub. 2 is positioned to keep the gear in mesh
with the worm 41 until the angle by which the gear has passed the
point at which maximum normal closure was reached is at least as
great as the maximum angle of retrogression of the gear when the
gear runs out of mesh with the worm. This insures that there will
be no retrogression of the blind from maximum normal closure when
the gear runs out of mesh with the worm.
It will be seen that the blind is automatically protected against
the possibility of deleterious overpull on the ladders by continued
rotation of the wand after maximum normal closure has been reached.
It will also be seen that retrogession of the blind from maximum
normal closure is limited and, preferably, obviated.
In the blind of U.S. Pat. No. 2,174.994 the gear can run out of
mesh with the worm at times. The worm is rotated by a cord-driven
pulley and the gear is to run out of mesh with the worm only when
accumulated slippage of the cord on the pulley is to be
corrected.
* * * * *