U.S. patent number 3,919,080 [Application Number 05/289,037] was granted by the patent office on 1975-11-11 for pyrite depression in coal flotation by the addition of sodium sulfite.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Continental Oil Company. Invention is credited to John C. Stauter.
United States Patent |
3,919,080 |
Stauter |
November 11, 1975 |
Pyrite depression in coal flotation by the addition of sodium
sulfite
Abstract
Pyritic sulfur flotation is depressed in aqueous flotation of a
fine particle size coal fraction by adding sulfite to the flotation
pulp.
Inventors: |
Stauter; John C. (Ponca City,
OK) |
Assignee: |
Continental Oil Company (Ponca
City, OK)
|
Family
ID: |
23109753 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/289,037 |
Filed: |
September 14, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
209/167 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B03D
1/006 (20130101); B03D 1/06 (20130101); B03D
1/008 (20130101); B03D 1/002 (20130101); B03D
2203/08 (20130101); B03D 2203/02 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B03D
1/00 (20060101); B03D 1/06 (20060101); B03D
1/002 (20060101); B03d 001/06 () |
Field of
Search: |
;209/166,167 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Other References
Gaudin, Flotation, 1957, Second Edition, p. 205. .
Taggart, Hand book of Mineral Dressing 12-129, 130 1947. .
Bur. of Mines, Tech. Progress Report, Feb. '72 TPR 51 pp.
1-7..
|
Primary Examiner: Halper; Robert
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Nisbett; Robert S.
Claims
I claim:
1. A froth flotation process for reducing sulfur concentration of a
coal containing pyrite comprising mixing in a flotation cell a fine
particle size fraction of said coal with an aqueous media and a
flotation gas in the presence of a soluble salt of a metal cation
and an anion capable of forming sulfite in an aqueous media whereby
the fine coal particles are removed from the cell in froth and
pyrite flotation is depressed with a substantial portion of the
pyrite being removed from the cell in the liquor phase and
recovering said coal having a reduced sulfur concentration.
2. A process of claim 1 in which the metal is an alkali metal or an
alkaline earth metal.
3. A process of claim 1 wherein the soluble salt is added to the
aqueous media in the ratio of about 0.1-1.0 lb/ton of coal and the
soluble salt is capable of forming in an aqueous media an alkali
metal or an alkaline earth metal cation and a sulphite anion.
Description
This invention relates to production of coal and especially coal
having a low sulfur content.
Various types of coal are produced for use as fuels which have
sulfur content that approaches or slightly exceeds the maximum
permitted. Several processes have been investigated to reduce the
sulfur concentration. These processes include methods similar to
those for mineral processing such as the use of cyanide depressing
agent, ferrous sulfate (Yancey and Taylor, USBM Report Invest.
3263, 1935), lime and sodium cyanide (Chapman and Jones, Jour.
Inst. Fuel, 28, 102, 1955), various hydrolyzed metal ions (Baker
and Miller, USBM Report Invest. 7518, 1971) and potassium
permanganate with sodium sulfite (Wade, Mining World, Sept., 1960,
p. 38). Various flotation systems have also been used (Miller, AIME
Trans., March, 1964, p. 7). Each of these processes has its
limitations. The process of this invention provides a simple,
inexpensive process for reducing the sulfur content of coal and
thereby an acceptable low sulfur coal.
According to this invention there is provided a froth flotation
process of reducing sulfur concentration of coal comprising mixing
in a flotation cell a fine particle size fraction of said coal with
an aqueous media and a flotation gas in the presence of a soluble
sulfite salt whereby the fine coal particles are removed from the
cell in the froth and pyrite is depressed with a substantial
portion of the pyrite being removed from the cell in the takings
phase and recovering said coal having a reduced sulfur
concentration.
The drawing shows the effect of sodium sulfite in depressing the
flotation of pyrite.
The process of this invention is readily adapted to conventional
coal processing because coal is normally separated into various
size fractions during mining and processing. Coarse fractions, if
need be, can be pulverized to produce the desired particle size
fractions and the proportion of fine particle size coal to be
treated by the process of this invention necessary to reduce sulfur
concentration to the desired value.
Likewise, present coal processing techniques frequently include
hydraulic or even flotation cleaning steps so that the process of
this invention can be readily adapted to conventional processing
techniques.
The process of this invention is especially advantageous because of
two unexpected discoveries. First, it is necessary in some cases to
treat only the fine particle size coal fraction in order to
substantially reduce the sulfur content of the entire coal stream
upon blending. And second, a very small amount of soluble sulfite
is required, that is about 0.005-0.05 weight per cent based on
treated coal or about 0.1-1.0 pounds of alkali metal sulfite per
ton of coal. In fact, higher concentrations did not perform as well
as concentrations in this range or a preferred range of up to about
0.8 pounds of sulfite per ton of coal.
Any conventional flotation apparatus and system can be used for the
process and to produce low sulfur coal of this process. Any
flotation apparatus in which the coal, an aqueous liquor phase and
a flotation gas, such as air are vigorously mixed forming a froth
which rises to top of the liquor phase can be used. The coal laden
froth is skimmed from the cell and the liquor phase with suspended
gangue materials is withdrawn from the lower portion of the cell.
Certain suspended coal particles are attached to flotation gas, are
lifted to the froth and removed from the trough with the overflow.
Various conventional additives such as hydrocarbon oils and
surfactants can be used to increase froth formation, increase
flotability of particular particles or to modify the process. The
flotation cell can have any of various configurations and can be
multiple cells with various flow arrangements.
The basic improvement of the process of this invention comprises
the addition of sulfite to the flotation pulp to depress flotation
of pyrite thereby causing a substantial portion of the pyrite to be
removed from the cell in the liquor phase and from the coal in the
froth. Substantially or a substantial portion is used herein to
mean a significant reduction of the pyrite that would otherwise be
floated in the fine particle fraction. The sulfite used in the
process of this invention can be any compound or salt which forms a
soluble sulfite ion in the flotation cell. In fact, the sulfite ion
is preferably formed in or added to the flotation cell immediately
prior to its use to prevent oxidation of the sulfite ion so that it
is no longer effective. Soluble sulfide forming compounds can also
be used. Preferred sulfites and sulfides are salts of a soluble
alkali metal, an alkaline earth metal (especially sodium and
potassium) and mixtures thereof. Obviously, additives which
interfer with the sulfite or sulfide ion should be avoided and
conventional additives that do not interfer can be used. Reference
herein to sulfite includes sulfide and equivalents.
The fine particle size coal fraction which can be treated by the
process of this invention is limited only by the flotation ability
of the particular apparatus and system used. In other words any
fine particle size coal fraction can be treated which is suitable
or amenable to flotation. A preferred particle size consists of
particles that will pass through a screen having about 28 U.S.
Tyler Sieve Size opening. This size fraction can be separated from
coarser fractions by hydroclassification to give a fraction of
about 28 mesh.
The following examples illustrate the process of this invention
with parts, percent, ratio and concentrations given by weight
unless indicated otherwise.
EXAMPLE 1
Two types of -28 mesh fractions of partially oxidized middle Eagle
strip coal and a high pyrite coal from Rowland Div. mine of
Consolidation Coal Company are thoroughly blended and divided into
ten samples. Each sample has 8.17 percent total sulfur and 5.82
percent pyrite sulfur. Each sample is added to the liquor of a
Wemco Fagergren flotation cell with an agitator rotation of 1,500
RPM at 8 percent pulp density and agitated for three minutes.
Flotation reagents, kerosene and isohexanol, are added and agitated
for 30 seconds before air is added to the cell. Sulfite is added as
sodium sulfite at four different concentrations giving 5 pairs of
samples at 0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 pound of sulfite per ton of
coal. Each sample is subjected to flotation until the froth
contains no coal. The results are given in Table 1 and the average
pyrite concentration versus pound of sulfite per ton is shown in
the drawing.
Table I ______________________________________ Sodium Percent
Percent Sample Sulfite Recovery Pyrite Average
______________________________________ (Lbs./Ton) 1 0.0 79 3.15
2.79 2 0.0 76 2.42 3 0.1 75 2.42 2.31 4 0.1 75 2.20 5 0.25 73 2.08
2.15 6 0.25 74 2.21 7 0.5 74 2.21 2.25 8 0.5 74.5 2.29 9 1.0 76
2.33 2.50 10 1.0 74.5 2.67
______________________________________
* * * * *